sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    ℹ️ Licensed Extensions | FredoBatch, ElevationProfile, FredoSketch, LayOps, MatSim and Pic2Shape will require license from Sept 1st More Info

    [Plugin][$] JointPushPull Interactive - v4.9a - 02 Apr 25

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Plugins
    617 Posts 155 Posters 590.8k Views 154 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • designerbursaD Offline
      designerbursa
      last edited by

      It would be great if you add the thickness to the surface and add the option to delete the surface after grouping

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • fredo6F Offline
        fredo6
        last edited by

        @designerbursa said:

        It would be great if you add the thickness to the surface and add the option to delete the surface after grouping

        The native PushPull does not have this option.
        Although this could be possible, I think there are enough options in JPP. It is easy to remove the face after push-pull.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • R Offline
          rv1974
          last edited by

          1.copy surface to buffer
          2.execute JPP
          3. paste in place
          4. delete

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • fredo6F Offline
            fredo6
            last edited by

            I don't understand. The grouping in Group PushPull 2D Faces is individual by face, which is not supported by JPP.

            So this is two different features.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • designerbursaD Offline
              designerbursa
              last edited by

              It would have been nice if there was an option of giving the thickness similar to the Autocad Exturude command! .. Yes, it is a waste of time but we can easily remove the remaining surfaces. πŸ˜„ Achievements in your studies Fredo6

              "Group PushPull 2DFaces" will not need this plugin! .. thanks Fredo6

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • designerbursaD Offline
                designerbursa
                last edited by

                I am sorry for my English πŸ˜„

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • R Offline
                  reza1813
                  last edited by

                  Dear Fredo,
                  Hello, I kindly reach you to mention a problem in the Joint Push Pull plugin.
                  When I model organic shape or complex surface(Almost curve form or tensile structure) Pushing of the surface is not moving well and also I have tried to copy of surface and then use Curviloft to close it but it also doesn't work properly. What should I do exactly in this Situation? Thanks in advance.
                  Joint Push Pull

                  Sincerely
                  Hamidreza

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • fredo6F Offline
                    fredo6
                    last edited by

                    Could you post the model with the Tensile surface, so that I can try to investigate the problem with JPP.

                    Also, can you use the Extrude tool in JPP (X marked) instead.

                    Fredo

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • R Offline
                      reza1813
                      last edited by

                      Dear Fredo,
                      Thanks a lot. It works when I use the Extrude tool in JPP (X marked). Thanks in advance.

                      Extrude tool in JPP (X marked)

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • CadFatherC Offline
                        CadFather
                        last edited by

                        Hi Fredo, i noticed that JPP will treat group copies as instances - i think it would be great to bypass this and have it treat groups as separate. perhaps something for the next update cycle...

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • fredo6F Offline
                          fredo6
                          last edited by

                          @cadfather said:

                          Hi Fredo, i noticed that JPP will treat group copies as instances - i think it would be great to bypass this and have it treat groups as separate. perhaps something for the next update cycle...

                          Definitely. This happens for freshly copied groups, that behave as components until you edit them. I need to correct this as I did in FredoCorner. Just some work!

                          Fredo

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • CadFatherC Offline
                            CadFather
                            last edited by

                            fantastic! : )

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • L Offline
                              Leon aa
                              last edited by

                              Hi, first of all I really like this plugin and I have been using it for some time now. Somehow the face selection via surface stopped working for me. The plugin only selects by face if I set it to surface.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • fredo6F Offline
                                fredo6
                                last edited by

                                @leon aa said:

                                Somehow the face selection via surface stopped working for me. The plugin only selects by face if I set it to surface.

                                Weird... May be you could

                                • open the Ruby console before launching JPP to check if there are errors
                                • post your model, or show a short video of the problem

                                Fredo

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • L Offline
                                  Leon aa
                                  last edited by

                                  I opened the Ruby console and then started the plugin, but there was no text in the console, so I think there's no problem there.
                                  I don't think that there's a problem with my model. I tried it on different models and it wasn't working either.
                                  Maybe there is a problem with LibFredo? I updated it last week and I haven't noticed any problem before. I tried reinstalling LibFredo and JPP, but it didn't fix anything.

                                  Here is how it looks in SketchUp, no error message, just not working as intended:

                                  https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/NYDBJXLT7sezAN-zo_IWJP4Acbj1OvDfYPJvVighSo7VZrWpVmUxxoeWVA990Dxz8BI-6V330jSpyn6ypOa98Ujt99LBn8Y9rk_L97MnKP60EQEeJEheowtRaqAukt8UFB6SAZ4xxJS8NBj_zAQZCcyT3Xo7gL9wa5FCGfd7Xc84DC6Bf6U0Si2rEBsl2QuwGAo_64YTmEvYjTE_q5QEMuRUrPFCPfJQH0u6vpgR9VuXjKDGKhZ7p2RELTMbT5pDB6EWPkdTs9TjZojeYQLyOLNlzNQiQv_T8a5Ije2KSUVas20TLmR0ONbOddARvr0GTu4ahaEkzqQW0vJzds3Jj6TwHpEwtmK77mWOJ1LtSEgi6-PVkWKGE7vDJ_vb2b3F7ig6o3WSAYYK994rumkb_sYyUnmQuP27MJ7osJiqfe2F-bM86idQ_EyYoPdMkYAORvNl1MIuART3NueFMFl8Th8HPh8Ks7vFv-mDh1XCF2PkEe5Um1DEXA8EtPCEN92ptFvv74acnZydPcK3shIGSN-KXZ1YEnn-TvzS7ubzbvPzx0D7hTaOwY3hzvtBa4-tnqUK3w2JQtxkWuEqRVnPGGTs80kpCDuImAy1gxJ_cgvl7V5HFq0v7PMVOTiDTWap9cKHspvmr4W7VsYxJ_4QOmaJZ_12LCjx68g8dAodSWiApzAsCQhOnn58Va5Guy2jNZZHSttnLAKJlAvXn2QYkjC_=w1563-h839-no

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • fredo6F Offline
                                    fredo6
                                    last edited by

                                    In Sketchup, surface is defined by a set of faces whose common edges are soft (so not smooth).

                                    Can you check in your model.

                                    Also, what happens when you turn off "Hidden Geometry" ?

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • E Offline
                                      Einstein
                                      last edited by

                                      Round Push Pull with minimum number of rounding segments = 1, that would be nice πŸ˜„ (Now it's 2)

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • R Offline
                                        rv1974
                                        last edited by

                                        Fredo, would it be possible to add 'afterward selection department' to JPP?
                                        Say 3 check boxes that rule which category will stay selected: initial faces, offset faces, or connecting faces.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • fredo6F Offline
                                          fredo6
                                          last edited by

                                          @rv1974 said:

                                          Fredo, would it be possible to add 'afterward selection department' to JPP?
                                          Say 3 check boxes that rule which category will stay selected: initial faces, offset faces, or connecting faces.

                                          I am not sure I understand. The selection scope option is kept across JPP sessions and even Sketchup sessions.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • R Offline
                                            rv1974
                                            last edited by

                                            Say you have state 0, then run JPP and immediately after execution (on exit) you'd have (wishful thinking) 3 states.
                                            The goal is ability to group selection and assign diffrent material or make some geniuos manipulations (independently).


                                            Capture.JPG

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 24
                                            • 25
                                            • 26
                                            • 27
                                            • 28
                                            • 29
                                            • 30
                                            • 31
                                            • 26 / 31
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Buy SketchPlus
                                            Buy SUbD
                                            Buy WrapR
                                            Buy eBook
                                            Buy Modelur
                                            Buy Vertex Tools
                                            Buy SketchCuisine
                                            Buy FormFonts

                                            Advertisement