[Plugin][$] JointPushPull Interactive - v4.9a - 02 Apr 25
-
First of all, thanks for the amazing plugins that you provide to the community!
For some reason, I am experiencing errors with the Round Push-Pull tool. This happens in SU 2017 and SU 2018 alike. Every time I am trying to apply the function, the following error message appears. I have the latest versions of the LibFredo6 (8.7) and Fredo6 JointPushPull (4.4b) installed on a Windows10 machine with the latest drivers for my NVIDIA 960 GPU's. Any idea?
Date: 13-Jan-19 09:26:04
An error occurred in Round Push Pull
Error in Analysis of modelCannot create unit vector from zero length vector
body_lib6g6.rbe: 1863 -- intersect_plane_plane
body_lib6g6.rbe: 1863 -- vector_exact_average
jointpushpullalgo.rbe: 1445 -- block (2 levels) in round_compute_direction
jointpushpullalgo.rbe: 1433 -- each
jointpushpullalgo.rbe: 1433 -- block in round_compute_direction
jointpushpullalgo.rbe: 1415 -- each
jointpushpullalgo.rbe: 1415 -- round_compute_direction
jointpushpullalgo.rbe: 1353 -- block in block_prepare_vertices_R
jointpushpullalgo.rbe: 1353 -- each
jointpushpullalgo.rbe: 1353 -- block_prepare_vertices_R
jointpushpullalgo.rbe: 1111 -- block in block_prepare_vertices_all
jointpushpullalgo.rbe: 1111 -- each
jointpushpullalgo.rbe: 1111 -- block_prepare_vertices_all
jointpushpullalgo.rbe: 519 -- algo_prepare_calculation_exec
jointpushpullalgo.rbe: 499 -- algo_prepare_calculation
jointpushpulltool.rbe: 826 -- dragging_start
jointpushpulltool.rbe: 1516 -- onLButtonDown -
Share the SKP file where you get this message.
-
Any model. A simple cube is already enough.
-
There's got to be something more to it than that. Round Push/Pull works fine on a cube here. What's different about your model?
-
@sunnygee2017 said:
Any model. A simple cube is already enough.
It works fine on a simple cube.
So there must be something special in your model, most likely polluting edges.
Anyway, I fixed the problem and it will go in a next version of LibFredo6.
But it's better to know why you have the problem.Fredo
-
I'm sure Joint Push Pull v4.4b has generated multiple groups at once for me. I just can't recall what choice of options do this. Anyone know? Think I chose the face by face option ... but can't seem to replicate the multiple group results.
OK. Just realized that multiple groups are generated when the faces I'm push/pulling are not connected.
-
It would be great if you add the thickness to the surface and add the option to delete the surface after grouping
-
@designerbursa said:
It would be great if you add the thickness to the surface and add the option to delete the surface after grouping
The native PushPull does not have this option.
Although this could be possible, I think there are enough options in JPP. It is easy to remove the face after push-pull. -
1.copy surface to buffer
2.execute JPP
3. paste in place
4. delete -
I don't understand. The grouping in Group PushPull 2D Faces is individual by face, which is not supported by JPP.
So this is two different features.
-
It would have been nice if there was an option of giving the thickness similar to the Autocad Exturude command! .. Yes, it is a waste of time but we can easily remove the remaining surfaces.
Achievements in your studies Fredo6"Group PushPull 2DFaces" will not need this plugin! .. thanks Fredo6
-
I am sorry for my English
-
Dear Fredo,
Hello, I kindly reach you to mention a problem in the Joint Push Pull plugin.
When I model organic shape or complex surface(Almost curve form or tensile structure) Pushing of the surface is not moving well and also I have tried to copy of surface and then use Curviloft to close it but it also doesn't work properly. What should I do exactly in this Situation? Thanks in advance.
Sincerely
Hamidreza -
Could you post the model with the Tensile surface, so that I can try to investigate the problem with JPP.
Also, can you use the Extrude tool in JPP (X marked) instead.
Fredo
-
Dear Fredo,
Thanks a lot. It works when I use the Extrude tool in JPP (X marked). Thanks in advance.
-
Hi Fredo, i noticed that JPP will treat group copies as instances - i think it would be great to bypass this and have it treat groups as separate. perhaps something for the next update cycle...
-
@cadfather said:
Hi Fredo, i noticed that JPP will treat group copies as instances - i think it would be great to bypass this and have it treat groups as separate. perhaps something for the next update cycle...
Definitely. This happens for freshly copied groups, that behave as components until you edit them. I need to correct this as I did in FredoCorner. Just some work!
Fredo
-
fantastic! : )
-
Hi, first of all I really like this plugin and I have been using it for some time now. Somehow the face selection via surface stopped working for me. The plugin only selects by face if I set it to surface.
-
@leon aa said:
Somehow the face selection via surface stopped working for me. The plugin only selects by face if I set it to surface.
Weird... May be you could
- open the Ruby console before launching JPP to check if there are errors
- post your model, or show a short video of the problem
Fredo
Advertisement