[Plugin] UV Toolkit
-
You da man, will test this tomorrow.
-
-
No, Mike, i'm more....
-
Mike???
-
Yeah, Mike
-
Well that's a new nick name...
-
And ThomThom left you like this on your last outing?
Edit: oops, in case that doesn't translate culturally, no insinuations intended.
-
Unfortunately TT was not there at our last outing - but otherwise it was something like that...
Back to-topic: fantastic tool, Thom, thanks a lot! I will now have to find another (improved) trick to do my arches...
-
@gaieus said:
Back to-topic: fantastic tool, Thom, thanks a lot! I will now have to find another (improved) trick to do my arches...
I have something up my sleeves for that as well, but it's in it's third re-coding. (...or was that fourth...) to get it working right.
-
Just let me know when you need a beta forum!
-
TT this ruby is amazing !!
Will be very usefull.
erikB -
Thank you so much Thomas.
-
Thanks for this one ThomThom it makes alot easier several uvmapping situations! this is great! Thanks again!
-
Yes very useful indeed, thank you Thomas!
The Remember/Restore function is very innovative too. I tried to make a pillow but it didn't work (back). Maybe because I also edited by using Move tool on single vertices?
However, with only Smoove it works well (front).
-
@shura said:
I tried to make a pillow but it didn't work (back). Maybe because I also edited by using Move tool on single vertices?
However, with only Smoove it works well (front).It didn't restore properly after using Move, but Smoove worked fine?
How how odd... I really don't know why that would be. I'll try and see if I can reproduce it. -
Hi,
I've reproduced the same process with a less complex geometry and it seems to work well (!).
When it did not work before, I have fiddled a lot with the vertices - or maybe the memory got lost when saving the file?
-
If you erase/recreate geometry you will loose mapping data.
-
Ah, that sounds plausible. Not sure what I did wrong, but I guess must have been something like that.
thank you Thomas
-
Looks like a very useful script, Thom...but I'm having problems loading the V2. The ruby is asking for core.rb in TT_Lib2. Is this different from the one in TT_UV_Toolkit; and if so, where is the Lib2 folder hanging out? Did that install as part of an earlier offering?
-
@unknownuser said:
Requirements
* SketchUp 7 or newer - ( Other versions untested ) * [**TT_Lib2**](http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?f) (v2.4.0)Yeah, it requires Thomthom's Menu
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better π
Register Login
Advertisement