[Plugin] Slender - Baking textures in Sketchup with Blender

qpik

@jql said:

So tell me one thing. Slender exports to blender does it all by itself and imports it back baked?

Exactly.

@jql said:

I wonder if it is compatible with Thea for Blender.

If only it can bake textures then I'd say yes. The plugin uses existing importers/exporters, so its main purpose is to automate unwrapping meshes and creating materials.

JQL

And how will you make the material assignement?

Material code names? Like Glass, Metal, Wood and the likes? Or you won't get into material properties?

qpik

@jql said:

And how will you make the material assignement?

Material code names? Like Glass, Metal, Wood and the likes? Or you won't get into material properties?

I don't know yet, maybe. Or a class for managing materials in SU and exported to COLLADA. Probably the first solution would be easier to extend with external material libraries.

Specularity/bump etc. are worth supporting but reflections/refraction can't be really baked, so its no use going too much into detail.

JQL

Well, I think it'll be nice if you pull it off. I wish you good luck and I'm following the thread.

gio

@jql said:

Well, I think it'll be nice if you pull it off. I wish you good luck and I'm following the thread.

+1

Ciao,
Gio

filibis

Hi qpik, this will definetely be a useful plugin and worth developing i believe.

Couple of things to note; i didn't know how to load a plugin via SU Console (assuming you meant Ruby Console?) and i found out i needed to type this with inverted commas: Load 'slender.rb'
You may consider to add info considering newbies to plugin world like me even at this stage to be able to test.

@qpik said:

@jql said:

So tell me one thing. Slender exports to blender does it all by itself and imports it back baked?

Exactly.

That just didn't work for me.
I opened your file and run the plugin via Ruby console and received the 'true' result but there is no COLLADA (.dae) file in the folder (there are textures exported though). And seems nothing happened.
Am i doing something wrong? If you could demonstrate with .gif or video, that would be great.

qpik

Have you unpacked the whole 'slender' folder from the zip file?
Do you have blender installed? Maybe the installation path is different than mine (C:\Program Files\Blender Foundation\Blender\blender.exe), check slender.bat in the 'slender' folder.
In sketchup open Ruby Console and type

load 'C;/../../slender/slender.rb'

with the actual path.

filibis

@qpik said:

Have you unpacked the whole 'slender' folder from the zip file?
Do you have blender installed? Maybe the installation path is different than mine (C:\Program Files\Blender Foundation\Blender\blender.exe), check slender.bat in the 'slender' folder.
In sketchup open Ruby Console and type

load 'C;/../..slender/slender.rb'

with the actual path.

Yes, unpacked, have Blender (2.78c) on default location.
But i found out that .dae and .log files are in my default plugin location (...\AppData\Roaming\SketchUp\SketchUp 2017\SketchUp\Plugins). So appearently my problem was copying 'slender.rb' file to that location in order to make the command (load 'slender.rb') work.

Now i tried your new code line with my path and it did some CMD stuff and received 'true' result on Ruby Console. But seems there is no imported result in SU. I tried importing that 'overwritten' .dae file but they seem identical. What should i expect at this point? Is it going to import baked result to side of the original model (as you show in first post)?

qpik

@filibis said:

What should i expect at this point? Is it going to import baked result to side of the original model (as you show in first post)?

The result should be the same as after importing COLLADA, a model ready to be placed in SU, but with shadows baked.
If you add

pause

at the end of slender.bat you should be able to see any blender errors.

filibis

Well, i got home and i tried on my laptop, it worked like a charm!
I will see tomorrow what causes problem in the office computer (only difference is that's Windows 7 64-bit).

Then i created my own scene, it worked pretty well too.
Except when i tried to experiment with some interior scenes. See attachment for faulty result. It's completely dark inside (with some light artifacts).

Original Model vs Baked Result

baked_result_comparison_v2013.skp

qpik

Simple triangulation issue in slender.rb (you should see HOLES NOT SUPPORTED in Blender console).

triangulated_faces => true

Fixed and reuploaded whole package. Result:

baked_result_comparison_v2013_qpik.skp
After tweaking slender.blend scene (Environment Lighting Raytrace -> Approximate) which you can try with your own settings:

baked_result_comparison_v2013_qpik_1.skp

filibis

Hmm, i see now better.
So, can we say it's not that suitable for interior stuff? Or is it possible to add other light types in addition to sun into baking process?

qpik

@filibis said:

Hmm, i see now better.
So, can we say it's not that suitable for interior stuff? Or is it possible to add other light types in addition to sun into baking process?

It's all a matter of translating objects from SU to Blender, then everything is possible.

JQL

qpik, you're using cycles or is this blender internal?

Rich O Brien

@qp

fantastic idea. Can't get it going yet so subscribing so I can flag updates

qpik

@jql said:

qpik, you're using cycles or is this blender internal?

So far internal, why do you ask?

JQL

Out of curiosity. I've seen great things coming from cycles and heard it's improving very fast.

Who knows where this plugin will lead so, maybe cycles would be a good bet.

filibis

@filibis said:

I will see tomorrow what causes problem in the office computer

I tried again in the office today, i noticed this code was missing in slender.bat

%~dp0\slender.blend

(see attachment) I don't remember deleting it, maybe downloaded the .zip yesterday before you update or something idk
So i downloaded .zip again today, it worked fine.

Pixero

A couple of question.

How does the geometry look when imported back into SketchUp?
Is it grouped the same?
Are the components intact?
Is the geometry triangulated or as it was originally in SU?

filibis

@pixero said:

How does the geometry look when imported back into SketchUp?
Is it grouped the same?
Are the components intact?
Is the geometry triangulated or as it was originally in SU?

Seems it imports one component that contains the whole geometry and everything inside exploded. Also triple clicking only select ones that shares the same material. See below for gif demonstrations.

Triangulation and other export features are optional (see attachment). (But making "preserve_instancing => true" doesn't seem to be working)