[Plugin] Manifold v2.2
-
The groups that it creates, is it suppose to be offset from the original group?
-
@thomthom said:
Just noticed, when I reload your script,
load 'manifold.rb'it keeps adding more menu items.Think it's because of the last line:
file_loaded(__FILE__)
Should it not be:file_loaded(File.basename(__FILE__))?whopops ! update in the pipeline...
I'll also fix the db() error... -
@thomthom said:
On a sidenote: you can save some lines in your
remove_inner_facesmethod by using more of Ruby's Enumerator and Array methods:> def remove_inner_faces() > faces = @gents.select { |e| e.class==Sketchup;;Face } > faces_to_go = faces.select { |face| face.outer_loop.edges.any? { |e| e.faces.length > 2 } } > faces_to_go.each{|e| > if e.valid? > clone_removed_into_error_group([e]+e.edges) > e.erase! if e.valid? > end#if > } > end >I just noticed them not too long ago while having another look at the Ruby docs, I realised I could cut down a number of lines in most my scripts.
Never mind this code. Seems to have a bug in it.
-
Got a case where the internal faces is removing too much. See attached file. Run the script on the large cube.
-
Here's v1.1 with some glitch fixes http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?p=218691#p218691
-
@thomthom said:
Got a case where the internal faces is removing too much. See attached file. Run the script on the large cube.
I'll look into it...
EDIT: removes innermost groups of outer-faces [?] AND leaves internal-faces edges behind [that's an easy fix]
-
fantastic,
go out on a family errand and come back to a whole new playing field, anything I can do to help?
a 'test' skp, if you need something more taxing,
or I'll try repairing it myself when you've got the next one up...
or need a tester... whatever you need...
about 25% of the poly count I would normally use for this sort of thing, and not triangulated.john
-
driven
I'll look at your problem - TT has already come up with one set of problems to fix !
With yours I get a non-planar points error - since there's only 3 of them it seems a bit strange...
We're really at 'beta' testing now - I only outlined the ideas some hours ago and issued this as my first go - it WILL get better
-
Very useful for boats builders
-
@unknownuser said:
Very useful for boats builders
and don't forget the humble Air Bed makers of the world...
TIG,
I did this simply to save you having to draw-up or look for something relevant to test onthe last 3 letters in watertight might contain none planer points, one had to be over-drawn with a poly-line and two unsoftened with eraser on the bottoms, before I could JPP them, oh the bottom of that A I made a real hash of.. missed it out and went back... I was in a rush...
I made the ring quite well, two joints (triangulated) near you name, I chose a ragged font in an attempt to create tiny voids and was surprised how well it came out. Fredo's Joint PushPull is remarkably clean, I have another test piece on file that is pilfered with bad seams if that's more useful.
john
I'll give anything a spin, it's great that your on the case...
-
Here's v1.2 http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?p=218691#p218691
Basic Ticker added. Better processing for inner faces.
Three-faced-edged external-faces now usually kept. [fixed TT's ball-breaker boxy mess
]
FR lingvo updated by Pilou.Still struggling with driven's monster...
More feedback and ideas please...
-
@tig said:
Here's v1.2 http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?p=218691#p218691
Still struggling with driven's monster...More feedback and ideas please... :ugeek:
that's the simple version, so far it's taken 2hrs 14 min and 49seconds just to explode all the groups so I can then re-group to test the plug on it (and it's only 600,000+ poly's)
I just fired up the other computer so I'll do some simple tests on it, while I wait
-
@driven said:
@tig said:
Here's v1.2 http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?p=218691#p218691
Still struggling with driven's monster...
More feedback and ideas please...that's the simple version, so far it's taken 2hrs 14 min and 49seconds just to explode all the groups so I can then re-group to test the plug on it (and it's only 600,000+ poly's)
I just fired up the other computer so I'll do some simple tests on it, while I waitI've added some more error reporting in the console to my own version so I can at least see what these errors are - seems related almost exclusively now to healing very tiny holes ?
I'm thinking perhaps to move these vertices to heal these tiny gaps rather than fail making edges that are too small inside a 'rescue' ? It would change the model's form, but so slightly you'd never notice...Watch this space
-
Did you scale it up even more?
-
@driven said:
Did you scale it up even more?
Scaling it up x100 or so might make the tiny gaps 'face' - but I looking at pinching the nearly closed verices together so that the gap goes... without much success it has to be said !
-
works on Mac
no Jade highlighting on second test, this model was coloured, 1st wasn't
hole repair goes from every other vert on torus?
messages
2 then
manifold, orienting faces then
6
no option dialogs, etc...(should there be?)CadSpan Style shows up no reversed faces after, GOOD
I'll try more
-
Sorry. shows up when I click on that repair, the first was there from the top, I'm sure....
EDIT: and it ungrouped separate geometry? -
OK, am I following this a bit better now.
I got a Manifold dialog-box on the comp_fish when no repairs were needed and the new group is moved to one-side, [url]/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=25473&p=218811#p218811[/url]
on the other, after the repairs were done, all 3 two manifold bits stayed in place so I get the 6 meaning six manifold selection? and the box points just stay to one-side.
-
EDIT: CRASHED OUT SU 20 seconds no crash report, and SU restarted on a new drawing, now that has [bnever happened before, and I mean everever SU doesn't restart....[/b]]
how odd, so I think I'll play some more
-
Run with the Ruby Console open for error reports - a new version will be available soon that I hope will be more robust...
Advertisement