[Plugin] Tree generator v0.2
-
Hi Richard,
I did wonder which Richard it was who made that tutorial
.
It turned out to be you....so Kudos to you for both the tut as the original tree factory SU file.
I had lots of fun with it and having an automated version would be awesome.
Hopefully one of those fine scripters sees something in it and develops it further. -
@ilay7k said:
Konstantine(aka mentor) use lsystem(onyxtree4max and Houdini) made such http://www.3dmentor.ru/3dcenter/branch_grow_01.mov
This looks fantastic, but it doesn't look like they are for SketchUp. I'm sure someone could implement this sort of thing though. We have some spectacular complex plugins, it's a case of one of the ruby gurus getting inspired to write one which builds trees though I guess
-
http://xaraxtv.at.tut.by/products.htm
The LSVG utility (fractal generator) type approach looks interesting. The author has already modified his spiral generator to produce DXF output for SU users.
It would nice if there was a way for Ruby to create these patterns and to do so using a similar interface.
-
I hereby bump this ancient thread as I think it contains really interesting ideas.
Perhaps a combination of...
- The fractal generator in this page
- Richard's Tree Factory techniques to place some branches in the generated lines
- Some nice .png clipmaps applied to low-poly elements for smaller branches and leaves
...would be excellent. I mean, something like this:
http://sketchup.google.com/3dwarehouse/details?mid=eaf0e00f27efcd4746db4da39bd77ac3
but with more 3D elements and smaller clipmaps so they are less noticeable. -
I hope I'm not speaking out of turn or raising unrealistic expectations but Tom (Tomsdesk) is busy with a few things that so far look very promising, I was fortunate to get a prototype of a realistic tree he made and must say it's frigging awesome and works great with SU, in fact It's a 2.8 tree (more than the normal 2.5, but not exactly 3, which can be massed and viewed from any angle including top, I had 200 in ascene without glitch.
Hopefully he will be done soon and post some images or samples. -
That sounds great! Can't wait!
-
Ditto
-
Good to hear.
I got a model last month with a tree apparently authored by a well known poster in these parts..
It has 18600 groups, 19000+ component instances and 260,000 triangles. For 1 tree. Ay Caramba!Procedurally generated stuff does tend to go nuts very quickly. I was wondering whether to write a tool that reports how "dense" each Component Definition you have in your model. Polygons / cubic meter type thing as I keep seeing models with an innocent chair or table in the corner with absolutely insane detail in comparison with the rest of the model.
Adam
-
Ouch, and I thought for a moment you would write a low poly tree script. Well, well.
Question: Would it be very difficult for someone to write a directx (filename.x) importer to SU?
I have this great tree[d] software that might be useful if there was a way of getting the model into SU. -
I'm keen to see tom's trees.
There has to be a good way to get trees working light weight for SU that will also work in renders! Large clips don't work so well for foliage as they tend to show an edge in renders.
I started working on a few ideas and some where proving very light weight and worked well in depth when rendered but they soon ended up exactly in the same spot as my low poly cars - working well but left to be done one rainy day! I've got to order a new box to crank out faster tests then I'm on again!
You have to say Pete the ones you see from your own work with Vue, full 3d trees are really required for rendering, watercolour renders are a different thing. Hopefully Toms new idea can break the back on this!
-
@pixero said:
Ouch, and I thought for a moment you would write a low poly tree script. Well, well.
Question: Would it be very difficult for someone to write a directx (filename.x) importer to SU?
I have this great tree[d] software that might be useful if there was a way of getting the model into SU.Yeah I've got that and did that but cant remember how, I think pete had another way to do it too! I think I ended up getting it through to SU as an obj file with jim's plugin after another process.
It was a really cool little application, I remember at the time emailing the developer and suggesting he was really on to something and to keep at it!
-
This reminds me of a code I wrote at the start of the month
It was originally just an idea( I have a lot of mostly-useless codes i've written), and didn't end up with very realistic results. I mostly based it on how to add thickness to branches, though they are all separate segments and not really attached, and not so much on the branch-generation (which was buggy).
(Amount of 2nd and 3rd stages of branches can be set, as well as radius, amount of circle-segments of branches (detail), and length of branches.)
-
It's a research project that analyses how to design fractal objects
ideascad.es
This domain may be for sale!
(www.ideascad.es)
-
I am still waiting for a more advanced tree-generator ruby, hope to see it soon.
-
This plugin - and the Tree Factory looks very interesting. Was there any plugin made to automate the Tree Factory method?
@richard said:
Must say with the quality of onyx's package - hard to beat that - though I would love to see someone write a script to find similar geometry within a component and make them nested replacing each instance of the similar geometry with a component.
Meaning say you have 2000 leaves each of similar geo but the location and orientation differs the script searches each instance of this similar geometry and replaces it with a copy of the first (component) and locates, rotates the new component to suit the geometry being replaced.
And that plugin is on it's way.
-
This fractal tree generation is great.
-
@thomthom said:
This fractal tree generation is great.
If you need some inspiration:
http://www.frecle.net/index.php?show=treed.about
tree[d] is the best tree creation app I've ever tried. And its free! (outputs to .x)And by the same author, the Tree editor in the coming Unity 3 (tree[d] on steroids).
http://hometime.net/tree%20edit/tree%20edit.htmlNote the yellow circle and squares. With them you can move and modify branches manually.
-
Following this with HUGE curiosity.
Can't wait to see to what spectacular plugin this will lead.. -
I too. Of course biggest challenges are:
- go Low or High poly depending on the user need....
- Use of component intensively for SU memory management and for fast modifications
- UV mapping of the parts at creation time...cause after that it's almost impossible job to do with SU tools
-
Wow that unity generator looks sweet! Looks to have some funky real time functionality though the example video leaves a bit to be desired!
I'm still keen to see Tom's new creations! Any idea where he is at with them! We so need a better tree option for SU use!
As for my own developments (and a far cry from the first shitty job like ten years ago), I've worked out how to cut the poly count WAY down and still get good leaf grouping at little poly cost, yet as Archigrafix hints, once I get to the bark mapping to the trunk and branches I'm stuffed and all fell in a heap!
Advertisement