@mwm5053 said:
Yes I see them now in my Spam folder.
Thank you very much for checking it. I have to admit that I don't really know why it lands in the spam folder of some email clients. I will investigate and if there is a solution for that at server-side I'll do that.
Until then I'm sure a filter or whitelist setting at your side will help to receive them to the right folder,
mwm5053: Please let me know if there are any changes on receving SCF mails today. I checked the server's mail system and I'm pretty sure that the mails are sent out. The funny thing is that during the checks even I realized that some SCF mail addresses were filtered out (not forwarded to my personal box) from my mailbox due to some filter settings I made several times ago and I forgot about them.
mwm5053: Thank you for the information. Are you using gmail to receive the mails? Today morning I made some modifications on the outgoing mail settings let's hope it helps. If not then probably we need to make some tests with your mail address to see exactly what is happening and why you are not receving the mails. So if even today you won't receive any mails what you think you should receive then I'll send you some test mails from the server and trace them.
Krisidious: Thank you for the information. So you receive the mails but gmail puts them into your Spam folder. Please set up a filter in your gmail mailbox for the SCF mails to be delivered into the folder you want to have them.
Could you please check your Spam folder as well? Since when haven't you receive the mails? Could you tell me when the last mail was received?
The outgoing mail address changed about a week ago. Is there a possibility that a filter is set to that address? (I have had a filter for noreply@sketchucation.com and now that the mail address changed back to it, first I couldn't find my mails until I realized that I have a filter set to that address.)
If you're on a corporate network, it also could be the case that company firewall restricts the access to the ads.
Don't forget to urlencode/urldecode the variable if it contains special characters...
@krisjaniszakis said:
...could you pleas post small code example ?
A possible exampele for myfile.php:
<?php if(isset($_GET['v'])) ; ?>
The variable; <?php echo $_GET['v']; ?>
<?php else ; ?>
<html>
<head>
<script type="text/javascipt">
var v=[ your function to get the ruby variables ];
function myredirect() {
window.location='http://myserver.com/myfile.php?v=' + v;
}
window.onload=myredirect();
</sript>
</head>
<body>
</body>
</html>
<?php endif; ?>
There is an other possible hack - however more complicated - to use GET variables instead of POST:
Not a usual solution but works.
@cotty said:
It would be nice if the different fields can be combined for a search:
Thank you Cotty, a good suggestion. We will put it on our "to do" list and will realize it after we are ready with the area for Plugin Developers.
@jim said:
Here's your one-liner:
UI.toolbar("Reload").add_item(UI::Command.new("Reload"){load "myplugin.rb"}).show
Thank you for the improved version.
IMO this one-liner is excellent for entering the load 'myscript.rb' command. Where myscript.rb is edited with a synax highlighting multiline text editor. 
@unknownuser said:
...it broke the plugin-checker-plugin...
Hi Pyroluna,
You mean the plugin checker in LibFredo6? I checked the URLs hardcoded in the latest version and to me it seems that they are pointing to the right places at the new site. Also Fredo6 states at the release notes section at http://sketchucation.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=180&t=17947#p144178 :
"LibFredo6 4.6e – 03 Oct 12: Minor release to fix a problem in Check for Updates, due to change of URL scheme of the new Sketchucation web site. Version 4.6d had a problem."
So it seems to me that if there were any problems with the URLs they were already corrected in the latest relase by Fredo6. Or you refer to some other plugin-checker-plugin? If yes, please specify exatly which plugin.
Best regards, Gábor
@tig said:
The initial SCF site load is slightly longer than that of a SCF page-change or page-refresh
Yes, the CMS part is slightly slower (max. 5-6 secs for the largest page load there for me) that is because caching there still needs to be fine-tuned. I'm sure it will be done in the near future and it will result similar page load times what we have at the forums now (not to speak about lower server load as a result).
It took 2.2 sec to me to download this page with ads now. Measured with Firefox and YSlow. Forum pages never took more than 4 secs. To me the 30 secs sounds like there are some other problems.