sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    ℹ️ Licensed Extensions | FredoBatch, ElevationProfile, FredoSketch, LayOps, MatSim and Pic2Shape will require license from Sept 1st More Info

    MSPhysics 1.0.3 (16 October 2017)

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Plugins
    926 Posts 171 Posters 883.1k Views 172 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • pilouP Offline
      pilou
      last edited by

      I have some problem to better "past" this articulated structure to the landscape!
      Convex Hull is used.

      What is the process for this sort of thing ?

      Density, other sort of hinge, Friction, ... ?

      GIF_bloka.gif

      BLOKA01.jpg


      blocka.skp

      Frenchy Pilou
      Is beautiful that please without concept!
      My Little site :)

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • O Offline
        oheimala
        last edited by

        Hi, I suppose the geometry of squares and hinges is the limit. Try with univeral joint instead of hinges. Then the squares can become to diamonds.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • pilouP Offline
          pilou
          last edited by

          It's not square cube, it's yet "diamond"! πŸ˜‰

          but maybe i have forgotten forget to give these Diamonds "convex" ! 😲
          change the diamond in convex state ...not better!

          Universal joint gives more liberties but "fall down" not more to the ground!

          here with normal hinge no problem πŸ˜„

          GIF_density.gif
          GIF_de_soit.gif

          Frenchy Pilou
          Is beautiful that please without concept!
          My Little site :)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • pilouP Offline
            pilou
            last edited by

            I put all "diamonds" as Convex Hull : not many better...


            blocka2.skp

            Frenchy Pilou
            Is beautiful that please without concept!
            My Little site :)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • pilouP Offline
              pilou
              last edited by

              I put all as Universal joints not many more better...


              blocka3.skp

              Frenchy Pilou
              Is beautiful that please without concept!
              My Little site :)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • F Offline
                faust07
                last edited by

                Shape of the ground: Static Mesh (The hill has concave areas)
                Material of blocks: Concrete (More weight for the deformation)
                Stiffness of Hinges: 0.95 (The geometry is otherwise too stiff, because the connections allow little lateral twisting.)


                block2-f07_03.gif

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • pilouP Offline
                  pilou
                  last edited by

                  Excellent! i will study your solution! πŸ‘
                  I was desesperated! πŸ˜„

                  Frenchy Pilou
                  Is beautiful that please without concept!
                  My Little site :)

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • pilouP Offline
                    pilou
                    last edited by

                    So my biggest error was the "Concave surface"! 😳

                    Will be very good for create very quickly some "roof structures" ! πŸ‘

                    GIF_structure.gif

                    Frenchy Pilou
                    Is beautiful that please without concept!
                    My Little site :)

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • pilouP Offline
                      pilou
                      last edited by

                      Seems very low intensity of Stiffness faraway element!

                      In case of concave surface maybe other joints can oblige the element to rotate more...? (universal...)
                      (not yet tested)

                      Here 0.1 stiffness
                      low_stiffness.jpg

                      Frenchy Pilou
                      Is beautiful that please without concept!
                      My Little site :)

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • P Offline
                        philhumphrey
                        last edited by

                        Hello,
                        I am trying to model a buoyant house simulation- However am having problems keeping the buoyancy in one plane. This is what the pontoon posts are for in real life. If anyone could please help me simulate this that would be great- thank you

                        Page Not Found

                        Web word processing, presentations and spreadsheets

                        favicon

                        (drive.google.com)

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • P Offline
                          philhumphrey
                          last edited by

                          Hello I am looking to model buoyancy, is there a way to stop an object falling over only buoyancy straight up and down

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • C Offline
                            cristyan
                            last edited by

                            Hello philhumphrey ! I have uploaded your file with some modifications. You have to play with density on the house and the buoyant material. and look how joint connection tool works or better you have to play a little with MSPhysics to understand how it works.For this you can download some file on 3dwarehouse searching "MSPhysics".


                            Buoyany Housing2.skp

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • pilouP Offline
                              pilou
                              last edited by

                              A cool site for tuto about MS Physics! πŸ˜‰

                              Frenchy Pilou
                              Is beautiful that please without concept!
                              My Little site :)

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • T Offline
                                tayyab2224
                                last edited by

                                It's been so long when started using Ms physics tool and I have learned so many things from developers but the thing is found on YouTube or over here , is flying an object like helicopter and air plane,
                                J have downloaded a model of an air plane, the plane can fly yeah, sketchyphysics is used in that model, the I want to ask is, how can do that in Ms physics?

                                M. Tayyab

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • OxerO Offline
                                  Oxer
                                  last edited by

                                  Hi, I installed the new SketchUp 2019 (Trial) to test it and I have obtain one error message in Ruby Console:

                                  Error al cargar archivo /Users/Oxer/Library/Application Support/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/main_entry.rb
                                  Error; #<IOError; The required, staged c extension file, "/Users/Oxer/Library/Application Support/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/libraries/stage/osx64/2.5/msp_lib.bundle", is missing!>
                                  /Users/Oxer/Library/Application Support/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/ams_Lib/extension_manager.rb;204;in `block in require_all'
                                  /Users/Oxer/Library/Application Support/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/ams_Lib/extension_manager.rb;201;in `each'
                                  /Users/Oxer/Library/Application Support/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/ams_Lib/extension_manager.rb;201;in `require_all'
                                  /Users/Oxer/Library/Application Support/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/main.rb;70;in `<top (required)>'
                                  /Applications/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp.app/Contents/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.5.1/lib/ruby/2.5.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb;59;in `require'
                                  /Applications/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp.app/Contents/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.5.1/lib/ruby/2.5.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb;59;in `require'
                                  /Users/Oxer/Library/Application Support/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/main_entry.rb;15;in `<top (required)>'
                                  /Applications/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp.app/Contents/Resources/Content/Tools/extensions.rb;197;in `require'
                                  /Applications/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp.app/Contents/Resources/Content/Tools/extensions.rb;197;in `load'
                                  /Users/Oxer/Library/Application Support/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics.rb;21;in `register_extension'
                                  /Users/Oxer/Library/Application Support/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics.rb;21;in `<module;MSPhysics>'
                                  /Users/Oxer/Library/Application Support/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics.rb;5;in `<top (required)>'
                                  

                                  MSPhysics v1.0.3 & AMS Library v3.6.0h
                                  SU2019 (Trial) & macOS 10.13.6

                                  "The result is the end what is important is the process" by Oxer
                                  [http://www.oxervision.blogspot.com/(http://www.oxervision.blogspot.com/)]

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • A Offline
                                    Anton_S
                                    last edited by

                                    Thanks for letting me know. I sort of intend to rewrite MSPhysics over simply recompiling the libraries, which should take a while.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • OxerO Offline
                                      Oxer
                                      last edited by

                                      Thanks for the info.

                                      "The result is the end what is important is the process" by Oxer
                                      [http://www.oxervision.blogspot.com/(http://www.oxervision.blogspot.com/)]

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • A Offline
                                        ashhenderson
                                        last edited by

                                        Hi there,

                                        Im trying to apply breaking forces's to scaffold components to simulate when it will fail under a set load.

                                        It looks to be possible by setting a breaking force to the fixed joint. the problem im having is the numbers are not making sense, e.g. when i rest a mass of 4kg on a joint with breaking force of 1962N (equal to 200kg of force) it breaks.

                                        Am i messing up the settings?


                                        Mass info


                                        Joint info


                                        Failed test

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • A Offline
                                          Anton_S
                                          last edited by

                                          Hello Ash Henderson,

                                          You are not messing anything up. Forces from the fixed joints are indeed incorrect. This is a bug in MSPhysics and I will fix it on the next release.

                                          Thanks,
                                          Anton

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • A Offline
                                            ashhenderson
                                            last edited by

                                            Thanks Anton, im looking forward to it!

                                            MS Physics has been great in simulating the failure in overloading or over extending cantilever scaffolds.

                                            Keep up the good work, You are doing a fantastic job!

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 5
                                            • 6
                                            • 46
                                            • 47
                                            • 4 / 47
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Buy SketchPlus
                                            Buy SUbD
                                            Buy WrapR
                                            Buy eBook
                                            Buy Modelur
                                            Buy Vertex Tools
                                            Buy SketchCuisine
                                            Buy FormFonts

                                            Advertisement