A new home for SketchUp
-
@dan rathbun said:
1) No skp export for any ViaCAD (import only.)
I never have anything to do with software that limits workflow to import only.
which probably limits you to a small amount of apps able to write the native SKP format... 3DS/OBJ export is included.
-
This topic is flying off in different directions, ViaCAD for example! While its fine to discuss peripheral issues, I think we should try and stick to the main topic otherwise there will be far too much cross-talking and the thread will be just too difficult to follow
I've put a proposition up! Should we be voicing opinions on how WE would like to see SU possibly 'morphing'. Any thoughts on this?
At least it may be something that John B and the team could hopefully comment on
After all, this is what most of us would like to get some reassurance on 
-
Reminds me of the Y2K issue, everyone speculating, fear and panic and ended up a total let down as life went on as usual.
No point in speculation or fear, lets wait and see.
@unknownuser said:
I've put a proposition up! Should we be voicing opinions on how WE would like to see SU possibly 'morphing'. Any thoughts on this?
I'd rather it improve to handle more poly's, give the necessary tools to coders, etc than morphing into something else.
-
in that case... my main hopes are improved dynamic components (something that would allow us to change the shape of a component other than via scaling (ie- an equilateral triangle into a right triangle -- for instance)
and another old wish of mine.. allow plugin icons to appear in the Mac toolbar upon launching (instead of closing the first window then making a new one)
(fwiw- I hardly ever bump into poly count problems etc.. but of course, performance upgrades are always welcome
... but personally, I'd rather see other improvements first) -
I want a gizmo.
-
-
I knew you'd poke me with that.
Just let me test it for hour or so. PPPPPPPPPLLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEAAAAAASSSSSSSSSSEEEEEEEEEE
-
This has been an interesting thread to follow.
I really would like to see SketchUp allowed to continue down the path it is on, after all that is why it is so unique amongst its peers.
So I can see the point of Trimble's integration into it's other software, but let the base engine develop as it has.
After all without the contribution of the Ruby masters, and the community in general sharing the methods of how they push the boundaries of this software, It would only be a quaint toy.
Why fix what ain't broken. -
I don't see any justification for all the negativity, myself. Those of us that have actually met and talked with the Dev team...there are quite a few of us; and in some cases that relationship goes back years...can attest to the fact that you're unlikely to meet a more dedicated bunch with a greater enthusiasm for their software or in their relationship with their user base.
They haven't even concluded the deal yet, much less are in any position to release further information on how that relationship will move forward. To all the doomsayers, it might be worth recalling what John wrote on the SU blog:-
'For the folks worried that we'll stop offering SketchUp for free, "The free version of SketchUp is an important part of our world as well, and that isn’t changing in the least."
For the folks worried that we'll only pay attention to the AEC industry, "If you’re one of the many, many people who use SketchUp for something else—from education to woodworking, geo-modeling to movie-making—rest assured that there will be a SketchUp for you, too."
If you're just worried because you don't like Trimble's website, don't judge a book by its cover.'
Are you accusing him of telling outright lies?So I'm hoping that the core program remains essentially the same and continues to do what it does...but better.
I'm hoping that its usability and popularity can be increased much further by the continued efforts of 3rd party developers like those on this forum...and that Trimble finds a way of facilitating and coordinating that development by working more closely with those 3rd parties to produce a more capable and even more diversified product than it is already....oh! and while you are gluing Trimble together, do you think you could spare a bit for the toolbars. -
@solo said:
No point in speculation or fear, lets wait and see.
wise words, pete.
what is the point of agonizing about something over which we have no control whatsoever?
-
Alan.
you're obviously not reading those statements via google.translate.almost_unbiased_english.com
-
When I first adopted SketchUp (v1), I was delighted with my new found ability to explain my building ideas to clients in understandable 3D. I never had any difficulty getting the design ideas across to co-workers with the use of 2D plans and some quick sections. Their brains automatically formed the 3D pictures.
My design work-flow was, get the idea, do some very rough freehand (mostly plan) sketches, then move on to tracing paper over a 300 x 300 mm grid and draft up (again freehand) the plans, sections, and elevations. For presentation of house design, I used to do quick and dirty single point perspectives which showed front gardens etc and the front elevation with some perspective 'cheats'.
Ideally for me, it would have been better if SketchUp had a SIMPLE 2D drawing front end. I know with the various plugins, this is possible but its not quite a simple process as I was used to with the tracing paper over my 300 x 300mm grid. Layout, is just that, a good layout process.
So my question is, could there be a companion front end to SketchUp that would allow the designer to 'draft up' the initial floor plans quickly and accurately? Maybe I should just start talking to the 3rd party developers that have produced all the great 2D drafting plugins and see what could be combined to create what I have in mind.
I think the ingredients are there, it maybe just a matter of mixing them into something to get what I want
-
I agree. Why be negative? It's all very interesting anyway. I keep thinking is v9 coming when the dust settles?
As for corporations, there is nothing really to expect but that they will act as corporations. The closest I got to that was working at a small firm that had corporate clients. The people with whom I would work were wonderful, fun, and professional; but the corporate bosses (and mind-set that everyone kow-towed to) were, as usual, a different matter. I never want to be that close to the corporate work world again. It stinks. I find it silly that people go to work at such a place then whine on the internet.
Doesn't mean SU will go one way or the other.
-
@unknownuser said:
Alan.
you're obviously not reading those statements via google.translate.almost_unbiased_english.com
Oh yes I am, Jeff. I just left the Add Unwarranted Cynicism box unchecked.
-
@solo said:
... lets wait and see.
Agreed. Until the next release of SU appears there's no way to know Trimble's intentions, anything they say now is public relations-speak, it may or may not be translated into actions.
When @Last sold SU to Google there was a great deal of speculation amongst the users, the optimists were excited about the huge resources Google would bring to bear on future development, others worried about what would happen to the development team and still others feared that Google would 'devalue' SU by releasing a free version as they had done with another app (I forget what it was).
If I remember correctly (and it's quite possible that I don't), @Last themselves stated at the time that the buyout would boost development, but in reality SU has largely stagnated in Google hands. At the time Google stated that the buyout would not result in any @Last people being 'let go', but behind the scenes some had already been asked to clear out their desks. And Google stated that they had no intention of releasing a free version, only to announce the free version soon after.
I'm glad Google won't be stifling SU's potential any longer, what Trimble will do with it remains to be seen but I'm not holding my breath. I love SU dearly and it's an important part of my workflow, but it became clear to me years ago that I couldn't pin any hopes on SU evolving much beyond what it was then (V5/6) or growing in the direction I needed to go. I looked to Luxology's modo as the next rising star and I'm happy to say that 5 versions later its still evolving faster than I can learn its new tricks.
I hope one day I'll be as excited about a new release of SketchUp.
-
I think much of the expectable, near (?) future features with a new version have been cooking in the oven for a while already (like LayOut had already been behind the scenes in @Last days and was only released with SU 6) so what I would really trust is the second (or third) release from now to really see where SU is going.
-
@mike lucey said:
So my question is, could there be a companion front end to SketchUp that would allow the designer to 'draft up' the initial floor plans quickly and accurately? Maybe I should just start talking to the 3rd party developers that have produced all the great 2D drafting plugins and see what could be combined to create what I have in mind.
What's wrong with ACAD LT? True, I've been using ACAD since R12, so I know my way around it, but I have yet to come across as facile and quick 2d drafting tool as ACAD. My workflow for new design is quick mockup of plans and elevations in ACAD, then import to SU as a template to begin 3D massing.
-
@alan fraser said:
@unknownuser said:
Alan.
you're obviously not reading those statements via google.translate.almost_unbiased_english.com
Oh yes I am, Jeff. I just left the Add Unwarranted Cynicism box unchecked.
... yeah - I do admit the translation could be a bit over the top, but its easier to spot highlighted orange than small grey print.
Im not the one applying the cynicism, its all there already, just not in plain english.
But believe you me - Before it was SKETCHUP supported by Google - now it is TRIMBLE supported by Sketchup.Anyway you are ofcause right - There is no need for negativity and fear. Sorry wasen't my intention - Im just a engaged user trying to figure out what they are doing to my beloved SketchUp. I any case, "3D for everyone" genie is out of the bottle, and if Trimble makes a mess of it - then it will just be somewhere else.
So from now on I will be positive and just get on with the job - but its a shame and just not right .. at all - Ups sorry - from NOW on. -
@andybot said:
@mike lucey said:
So my question is, could there be a companion front end to SketchUp that would allow the designer to 'draft up' the initial floor plans quickly and accurately? Maybe I should just start talking to the 3rd party developers that have produced all the great 2D drafting plugins and see what could be combined to create what I have in mind.
What's wrong with ACAD LT? True, I've been using ACAD since R12, so I know my way around it, but I have yet to come across as facile and quick 2d drafting tool as ACAD. My workflow for new design is quick mockup of plans and elevations in ACAD, then import to SU as a template to begin 3D massing.
Thanks Andy for commenting on my suggestion. I have tried many many 2D apps. In the office it was / had to be Acad.
I suppose what I'm really after is to have a (front end 2D) version of SketchUp with its simple straightforward looking GUI but strictly for 2D work and then when finished that part of the workflow, click a button and the GUI / program changes to SketchUp.
Back in my Win using days
I got to grips with a simple 2D app, forgot the name, that I really liked using for simple 2D concept sketches. The main feature was that the user could 'freehand' circles, squares, rectangles etc and the app would turn them into ridged geometry if required. I really don't think we have moved that far from the desire to just 'draw in the sand'.I suppose SketchUp could well be compared to making sand castles, an enjoyable pastime that appeals to both kids and adults alike, also I've seen some really impressive sand sculptures.
EDIT: That 2D app I could not think of while writing was SmartSketch
, an Intergraph product,
http://www.intergraph.com/products/ppm/smartsketch/comparing_smartsketch_autoCAD.aspx
-
@thomthom said:
@rich o brien said:
I want a gizmo.
Or like this?
[attachment=1:2hvmw8f0]<!-- ia1 -->Gizmo.png<!-- ia1 -->[/attachment:2hvmw8f0]
[attachment=0:2hvmw8f0]<!-- ia0 -->GizmoRotate.png<!-- ia0 -->[/attachment:2hvmw8f0]You're like a freakin mad scientist mate! Little lab in the back playing head down with your chemestry set!
Advertisement