[Plugin] Contour Maker v1.6

massimo

Can you post the example SKP before Contouring...

It was only a quick test and i don't have the file anymore. Anyway you can replicate that easily. It was a terrain mesh generated with the sandbox tools: from scratch+smoove and then smoothened.

@unknownuser said:

For now use an 'Erase Coplanar Edges' tool [there are several available] before you make the Contours and the problem will vanish with the coplanar edges...

Sure. Thanks

Gaieus

ThomThom's CleanUp plugin will get rid of those edges, too (and many more...)

massimo

Already used that. Thanks Gaieus.

simon le bon

@tig said:

@massimo said:

Thanks TIG, seems to work fine.
It's possible to get rid of that mesh grid on the Z=0 level? Perhaps an option?

I see the problem.
Can you post the example SKP before Contouring...
So I can play with it...
I suspect some sort of 'Erase Coplanar Edges' is needed within the tool - but it will occur at any z-level if you have a mesh that you haven't used 'Erase Coplanar Edges' on and there are multiple faces - It simply uses what it's given...

For now use an 'Erase Coplanar Edges' tool [there are several available] before you make the Contours and the problem will vanish with the coplanar edges...[/i]

Hi Tig and Massimo and Gaieus ,

Here are 'Erase Coplanar Edges' tools:

thomthom_[Plugin] Cleanup (2.0.0)
For SU7.1 Doesn't work on my SU6 free.

a4chitect_ cleanup.rb

J.H. Aughey_CleanUP Model

Well! I have tried Tig's solution:

@unknownuser said:

For now use an 'Erase Coplanar Edges' tool before you make the Contours and the problem will vanish with the coplanar edges...

but that doesn't work very well.
The simple working solution I have found is to avoid z=0. Moving the group up (or down), activate Contour Maker, Move the group back to the initial position.

Cheers, simon.

MALAISE

Very useful for geological drawings

Thanks TIG

TIG

Simon...

When you use the erase coplanar edges tool do you have hidden-geometry 'on'.
Then when you have the simplest mesh possible make the contours...

simon le bon

Hi Tig,

I had tried only with all edges unsmoothed.
So I just have tried with hidden geometry "on" as you say. The result is not bad but seems not the best.

++simon

TIG

It does exactly what you tell it to do...
If you move the mesh up in the Z by 1mm the result will change...
The contours are 'true' - the mesh might not be exactly as you hope BUT the 'contours' represent what is there...

simon le bon

Ah OK!
I think I began to understand how Contour maker works.

@unknownuser said:

The Contours always start their vertical spacing from Z=0 UP & DOWN.

simon

TIG

Here's v1.6 - http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?p=273795#p273795
Minor corrections to syntax [arguments all inside () ] that has no affect on results but covers possible future deprecation...

mitcorb

Hi,TIG:
Could you explain what you mean by possible future deprecation?
It suggests to me that other tools may not tolerate the use of this one?

TIG

A method's 'deprecation' is when a method or a part of a method is no longer 'used' or 'works'.
For example in many API examples in the guides it will say for things like:
entities.add_cline point1, point2
this works fine in past and current versions...
BUT the 'standard' way recommended in Ruby and guaranteed to stop faults is to use 'parenthesizes' to enclose all arguments, like this
entities.add_cline(point1, point2)
[Note NO space between the method and opening ( and the arguments are separated by ',']
This also gets over the occasional glitch that occurred in existing code with the new PC version of Ruby shipped with v8, for example in v7 this [probably] worked
my_command (x+y/2), z
in v8 it will fail because the first set of stuff inside the '()' is taken as all the arguments there are and the following ', z' throws an error, but changed to
my_command((x+y/2), z)
it then works for both versions and is also 'future-proof' as all of the arguments are now encapsulated inside the ()...

mitcorb

Thanks for your explanation, TIG
You are an amazing dude.
Another question. Could this tendency toward deprecation be the reason why older scripts that worked fine last year, suddenly do not work this week, even though the same SUversion is being used?

Didier Bur

Hi,

@unknownuser said:

Could this tendency toward deprecation be the reason why older scripts that worked fine last year, suddenly do not work

Yes, especially since SU8 is out. The API "uses" a newer version of Ruby that is less permissive, concerning arguments within brackets, no spaces between function name and arguments, and such boring coding stuff.

mitcorb

Didier wrote:
"...such boring coding stuff"
I am dragging this way off topic, but one more comment and I will quit.
I superficially understand that all of those punctuation marks and symbols are a way to organize the input, but why should input be so tedious? Just think about it, don't answer so that this thread can continue.

JGA

Thanks very much, it works well!

chenkl

Thanks TIG

pilou

Life is encapsuled (Life)

Keep the good work

CAD Addict

I haven't had time to try it, but I have a question.

Isn't it the same as the Sandbox tools can do?

What does it do better than the standrads sandbox?

Thanks

TIG

@cad addict said:

I haven't had time to try it...
Isn't it the same as [what] the Sandbox [does]...?
What does it do... better...?...

No, it's quite different!
The 'opposite' tool in fact...
The Sandbox tool takes contours supplied to it, that are already set at the correct heights, and makes a mesh surface from them.
The ContourMaker tool takes a mesh surface and it makes [grouped] contours from it.
Your mesh might not have been made from contour data at all, but contours can be very useful when visualizing a complex land-form - this tool lets you add them.