SU 9 Wishlist

thomthom

My wish list for V9. Ruby right now has the option to add, cmd.tooltip = "Tooltip", cmd.status_bar_text = "Helpful hints". I would like to see another, cmd.filename ="2ptcircle.rb". This cmd would display the plugin's name.

A little thing but I like to be able to determine the name of each plugin in the tool bar icons.

Undock the toolbar and the name will be in the title.

pbacot

A couple things, while on my mind:

I know we have more excellent plugins for organic work, but if Sandbox is to continue to be offered, one thing that must be fixed is this: If a large face is selected when the Smoove tool starts, it hangs forever. Doing an undo with the Smoove tool on can sometimes create this selection and you're stuck for several minutes. There has to be some sort of control of this.

Working with the Outliner, clicking on the name of a chosen element can erase the name too easily. It's easy to hit the name while working quickly in the list. It should be something special to edit the name (like choose and press enter), and then text should be highlighted, not erased, AND if the user does no typing, but goes on to work in the drawing, it should just revert, not be empty. The function of clicking seems erratic. Also the list jumps (scrolls) when one clicks and so that the cursor ends up over another element in subsequent clicks.

ken

@thomthom said:

@unknownuser said:

My wish list for V9. Ruby right now has the option to add, cmd.tooltip = "Tooltip", cmd.status_bar_text = "Helpful hints". I would like to see another, cmd.filename ="2ptcircle.rb". This cmd would display the plugin's name.

A little thing but I like to be able to determine the name of each plugin in the tool bar icons.

Undock the toolbar and the name will be in the title.

Yes the toolbar name will be there, however the actual ???.rb name will not be there. And that is what I wish to know.

Thanks for your quick reply.

Ken

Aerilius

I'm not sure if one single file can be matched to a toolbar. A toolbar could be defined in what we see as "sub files" of a plugin, which are for Ruby all the same. A toolbar definition could even be scattered over several files.

Ar you sure it wouldn't be solved by better plugin management/installation/uninstallation? (knowing which files belong to which plugin name or even not having to care about that anymore)

thomthom

@aerilius said:

I'm not sure if one single file can be matched to a toolbar. A toolbar could be defined in what we see as "sub files" of a plugin, which are for Ruby all the same. A toolbar definition could even be scattered over several files.

Ar you sure it wouldn't be solved by better plugin management/installation/uninstallation? (knowing which files belong to which plugin name or even not having to care about that anymore)

+1

doush-007

To be powerfull in redering... hello..my name is mousa abu doush and i am an architect use sketchup for 6 years it would be helpful to add some feature to sketchup to be powerfull inrendering like 3ds MAX.

1-sketchup must make an archive for materials for any render engine ...so the maps will not disapear if i copy it to anther PC.
2-sketchup 9 must have preview for enviroment in the scene if i want to use HDRI map.
3-sketchup 9 absolutely must be 64bit to able to use more Ram when we mak rendering.
4-sketchup 9 must have the ability to import .obj files without plugin.
5-its will be perfect if i can see bump maps and another maps in the scene ..like 3ds Max

and i have i have alot of things to discuss with developer..put that right now will be enough....thnx

thomthom

@doush-007 said:

1-sketchup must make an archive for materials for any render engine ...so the maps will not disapear if i copy it to anther PC.

? SketchUp ready attach the textures with the .skp.

andomar

i'm sorry but it is mi wish:
trimble sketchup team should resign. why?, beacuse they don't want SU 64 bits, don`t want improve uv maping, don't want multi threading, they don want do nothing, so only they want the users of sketchup migrate to max,to rhino, sometime i think they only want our beloved SU die.

For finish, This is not to offend or annoy to the trimble sketchup team, but it`s that they are communicating.

a_iverson

I want to learn can i create like this in sketchup and can i get powerfull renders like this.
If not, i must learn 3ds max

[xxl-img:32axcvwj]http://features.cgsociety.org/newgallerycrits/g56/93456/93456_1265951134_large.jpg[/xxl-img:32axcvwj]
[xxl-img:32axcvwj]http://3dtotal.awc.lswcdn.net/admin/new_cropper/gallery_originals/2012-07-17(117112)_Game-of-life_2.jpg[/xxl-img:32axcvwj]

doush-007

let me explain ..when i using Vray if i put bump map or reflection map or any map except diffuse map..that will not copied with the file because it just have the extention of the picture and will not find the extention in the other computer..so that is so important......

thomthom

@doush-007 said:

let me explain ..when i using Vray if i put bump map or reflection map or any map except diffuse map..that will not copied with the file because it just have the extention of the picture and will not find the extention in the other computer..so that is so important......

That is an issue with V-Ray - not SketchUp. You cannot expect SketchUp to account for every extension there is to it.

thomthom

@a_iverson said:

I want to learn can i create like this in sketchup and can i get powerfull renders like this.
If not, i must learn 3ds max

That is more about learning the render engine of choice - the modelling is just one part of it.

Aerilius

Trimble wants especially one thing: invest strongly into SketchUp. That's something we haven't heard for years.

There hasn't been any totally new release under Trimble (only a Google-branded bugfix release at the transaction days). And it's still true that they say they don't reveal their future product plans (from which we can't deduce that they don't want these features).
So we shouldn't assume SketchUp 9 won't contain any features.

DesertRaven

I still want a constraint override button or keyboard shortcut and Object Snap Options! (also fix that center snap I'm tired of hovering)

One outrageous wish is NURBS curves for SU

Cheers

ArCAD-UK

mi wish: That SU doesn't become bloatware because some people don't get it's lean efficiency. If I wanted it to perform like AutoBad, ArchiCAD, Solidworks or 3D Studio that is what I would have bought not come here b*tchin about it not doing the same job.

Dave R

@arcad-uk said:

mi wish: That SU doesn't become bloatware because some people don't get it's lean efficiency. If I wanted it to perform like AutoBad, ArchiCAD, Solidworks or 3D Studio that is what I would have bought not come here b*tchin about it not doing the same job.

Rich O Brien

@andomar said:

i'm sorry but it is mi wish:
trimble sketchup team should resign. why?, beacuse they don't want SU 64 bits, don`t want improve uv maping, don't want multi threading, they don want do nothing, so only they want the users of sketchup migrate to max,to rhino, sometime i think they only want our beloved SU die.

For finish, This is not to offend or annoy to the trimble sketchup team, but it`s that they are communicating.

Where did you hear all this info?

andomar

Here : http://productforums.google.com/forum/#!category-topic/sketchup/feature-suggestions/cqdbwirP_T8

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

thomthom

@andomar said:

Here : http://productforums.google.com/forum/#!category-topic/sketchup/feature-suggestions/cqdbwirP_T8

And you did read the explanation to why they are not focusing on 64bit? As they try to explain, 64bit doesn't magically makes applications go faster. All it means is that it can address more memory. And I have never seen SketchUp ever run out of memory. Only times the SketchUp process has run out of memory has been when using render engines which runs inside SketchUp instead of spawning their own separate one. And that's really a design issue with the render application, not SketchUp.
As Jason explains there, it's better to ask what you really want instead of guessing on technical implementations. Leave the technical implementation to the developers.

rv1974

@thomthom said:

@andomar said:

Here : http://productforums.google.com/forum/#!category-topic/sketchup/feature-suggestions/cqdbwirP_T8

And you did read the explanation to why they are not focusing on 64bit? As they try to explain, 64bit doesn't magically makes applications go faster. All it means is that it can address more memory. And I have never seen SketchUp ever run out of memory. Only times the SketchUp process has run out of memory has been when using render engines which runs inside SketchUp instead of spawning their own separate one. And that's really a design issue with the render application, not SketchUp.
As Jason explains there, it's better to ask what you really want instead of guessing on technical implementations. Leave the technical implementation to the developers.

Let's take a look at exploding or terrain creation for instance. Now those procedures knock SU out. Wouldn't 64bit architecture solve the bottle neck? (when I make 'mesh attaching' in Max 64bit for example (no mention 'bout heavy vray rendering) it really eats huge amount of RAM)
(me by no means a teck geek so I really wonder)