I'm thinking Apple maybe like Murphy's dog!
-
there is one point there.
sorry Steve. you do not decide what I see or don't see off of your own interests. if I want to look at something, whether it is porn, lolcats or anything else, a private individual such as yourself does not decide that.
and that is why I'll never own an apple product as long as he is calling the shots.
-
@mike lucey said:
... I think I would have to give the debate to Steve even if I do not totally agree with him.
Thanks for the link to that fascinating discussion. As for who "won", it depends on which kind of "points" you are counting. Social Justice vs. Abstract Logic vs. Debating Style vs. ...
I recently saw a televised debate between Michael Shermer, publisher of Skeptic Magazine, and Depak Chopra on the existence of God. I was very glad to see Chopra on the God side instead of a Bible Literalist. The debate took place at Cornell University and the audience was clearly sharply divided. Very interesting was the post-debate interviews with participants and audience. Pretty unanimously, both sides were very satisfied that they had won.
-
well the first thing i did with my iphone is jailbreak it. so i win the debate!
-
I have also jailbroken my iPhone. As its so easy to do this, what is the point in Apple acting as moral nannies?
-
total BS!
thats like if a dvd player manufacturer tried to decide which dvd's you can watch on their (your) player. 
-
Well, its more like if the DVD player decided it would only play DVD's that were burned using a Freeware app - no commercial burning software like Nero.
-
And we heart Adobe!
Advertisement