• Login
sketchucation logo sketchucation
  • Login
πŸ€‘ 30% Off | Artisan 2 on sale until April 30th Buy Now

[Plugin] SketchyFFD (Classic)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Plugins
412 Posts 153 Posters 419.2k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Offline
    juju
    last edited by 11 Feb 2008, 22:08

    I'd take "really really slow" over "no such function at all" any day.

    Save the Earth, it's the only planet with chocolate.

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • P Offline
      Pixero
      last edited by 11 Feb 2008, 22:21

      I think its pretty clear what he means.
      He much rather have a slow tool that does what he wants then not having that tool at all.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • C Offline
        CPhillips
        last edited by 11 Feb 2008, 22:45

        @unknownuser said:

        The example in the pic takes a few seconds to deform.

        So do the points placed actually have different coordinates assigned to them? That's what I was asking in my previous post. I find it kinda hard to explain, I hope you know what I mean.

        Yes they do. Each construction point has its original position stored in an attribute. Thats how I know how far the point moved. But that is only 1/2 the equation. You also need the pre-calculated weight. That is what is missing when you copy a control point. Its that quick because it doesn't have all the calculated weights to process.

        If you want to try it with more control points do this:
        -Select the group you want to deform.
        -Open the ruby console and enter the following line:

        startFFD(Sketchup.active_model.selection[0],7.0)

        That will create a 8x8 control grid (8-1=7.0). Delete the points you don't intend to move to make it a bit faster.


        ffd9x9.skp

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • C Offline
          CPhillips
          last edited by 12 Feb 2008, 07:22

          I made a new version that has a NxN FFD. That means you can select how many control points there are in each direction. It isn't as slow as I expected.

          Here is a 12x12x2. I am playing back my undo buffer so it looks faster than it is.

          Ill post it once I fix a bug or two.

          Just when I thought I was out they pull me back in.
          Chris

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • J Offline
            juju
            last edited by 12 Feb 2008, 10:17

            @unknownuser said:

            @unknownuser said:

            I'd take "really really slow" over "no such function at all" any day.

            Juju, I find your replies are often cryptic. What's the bottom line?

            @pixero said:

            I think its pretty clear what he means.
            He much rather have a slow tool that does what he wants then not having that tool at all.

            Exactly! Thanks for clearing that up for me.

            Save the Earth, it's the only planet with chocolate.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • F Offline
              Fletch
              last edited by 13 Feb 2008, 06:29

              Can't wait to play with this, Chris, thank you from the bottom of my heart... been wishing for this for a loooong time.

              Fletch
              Twilight Render Cross-platform Plugin for SketchUp on PC or Mac

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • C Offline
                CPhillips
                last edited by 13 Feb 2008, 06:53

                This version supports NxN deforms. But more importantly it updates the mesh automatically when you move control points. That makes it a lot more usable.

                Also added status text progress when it is weighing and deforming the mesh.

                Making a curling wave with a 13x13x2 FFD.

                See the PluginStore for the download...

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • R Offline
                  remus
                  last edited by 13 Feb 2008, 07:00

                  cheers for the update chris, this will make an already powerful tool all the better.

                  http://remusrendering.wordpress.com/

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • D Offline
                    Daniel S
                    last edited by 13 Feb 2008, 11:38

                    Thank you Chris!!! 😍 😍 😍
                    The Update FFD is obsolete now πŸ˜„

                    Daniel S


                    Update FFD no longer in use.JPG

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • R Offline
                      remus
                      last edited by 13 Feb 2008, 12:52

                      here a quick (30 mins or so) pear i knowcked up, partly using FFD.


                      pear.jpg


                      pear.skp

                      http://remusrendering.wordpress.com/

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • N Offline
                        notareal
                        last edited by 13 Feb 2008, 13:02

                        πŸ‘ Impressive, organic modelling did take a grand leap! Just if there where nice tool for subdivision surface... pokes Whaat

                        Welcome to try [Thea Render](http://www.thearender.com/), Thea support | [kerkythea.net](http://www.kerkythea.net/) -team member

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • K Offline
                          krash88
                          last edited by 13 Feb 2008, 13:13

                          Great job! The auto update is very nice. But I have one problem... If I create a flat piece of geometry similar to your wave demo, then strange things happen. After moving a control point the geometry disappears and the camera goes nuts. It sticks me in an over-head view, miles away from the control points. After a zoom extents I can tell that the geometry is still there and is selectable, but not visible. Turning on hidden geometry doesn't help and any attempt to zoom in or out puts me back over-head at a great distance from the points. It seems to work great on geometry with thickness. Any help is appreciated and thanks again for the wonderful script!

                          Edit:

                          After looking back at your wave demo, I noticed that you have a vertical edge at one corner of the mesh to give it thickness and I assume that you have deleted the control points from the bottom also. I tried this and it works just fine. So thanks again for the script!

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • E Offline
                            ely862me
                            last edited by 13 Feb 2008, 13:49

                            this is awsome for cars,until finding this i had on my car square from now i won t have any square,just litle mouvement with mouse and all is fine,,,,thank u very much

                            Elisei (sketchupper)


                            Before no life was done on Earth it was THE LIFE ITSELF...GOD
                            Come and See EliseiDesign

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • D Offline
                              Daniel S
                              last edited by 13 Feb 2008, 14:06

                              Here i attach a video using FFD like a twist tool...
                              it would be easy to make this automatic with ruby?
                              i mean.. to set the center of rotation (like in TIGΒ΄s Grow.rb) and the rotation angle.

                              Daniel S


                              twist tool.gif


                              FFD Twist Video.zip


                              Twist FFD.jpg

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • A Offline
                                Ampa
                                last edited by 13 Feb 2008, 14:37

                                Wow! This has now officially crossed the line from 'pretty darned impressive' to "stunning".

                                Thank you for sharing this with the community.

                                Ampa

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • K Offline
                                  kwistenbiebel
                                  last edited by 13 Feb 2008, 18:59

                                  Awesome guys !!!!!REALLY 😲 😲 😲
                                  This together with Whaats 'polycount controller' (= subdivide and smooth plugin) is simply great stuff. So we can finally do some organics in SU ? 😍 😎

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • W Offline
                                    Whaat
                                    last edited by 13 Feb 2008, 19:41

                                    Looks amazing! πŸ‘
                                    Great job!

                                    SketchUp Plugins for Professionals

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • K Offline
                                      krash88
                                      last edited by 13 Feb 2008, 20:19

                                      I just wanted to post something to show how this has helped to add life to my renderings. Thanks again!


                                      curtain2.jpg

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • K Offline
                                        kwistenbiebel
                                        last edited by 13 Feb 2008, 20:38

                                        That's really cool Krash88.

                                        The only little remark I have with current plugin (besides saying it is awesome πŸ˜„), is that after some manipulation, it starts to become difficult to see which points to move.
                                        It would be great if the control points would stick more to the geometry...I am not sure if my explanation is clear.

                                        Another thing is, I noticed that the outer limits of geometry gets changed by the plugin, even though only points were selected in the middle (no points located at the boundaries of an object). I experienced this issue as well while using the 'sandbox tool' in SU.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • K Offline
                                          krash88
                                          last edited by 13 Feb 2008, 20:57

                                          @kwistenbiebel said:

                                          That's really cool Krash88.

                                          The only little remark I have with current plugin (besides saying it is awesome πŸ˜„), is that after some manipulation, it starts to become difficult to see which points to move.
                                          It would be great if the control points would stick more to the geometry...I am not sure if my explanation is clear.

                                          Another thing is, I noticed that the outer limits of geometry gets changed by the plugin, even though only points were selected in the middle (no points located at the boundaries of an object). I experienced this issue as well while using the 'sandbox tool' in SU.

                                          I think every vertex in a piece of geometry holds some weight with every control point. Maybe adding an option for fall-off would help a little with both of your issues. It may be asking too much, but an option for "freezing" certain edges could help so that the weight calculations won't affect them(for your edge problem). Maybe creating a sub-group that doesn't include the edges you want to remain in place and then only deforming the rest of the geometry will solve the problem as well. I'll try that out later.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • 1
                                          • 2
                                          • 3
                                          • 4
                                          • 5
                                          • 20
                                          • 21
                                          • 2 / 21
                                          2 / 21
                                          • First post
                                            34/412
                                            Last post
                                          Buy SketchPlus
                                          Buy SUbD
                                          Buy WrapR
                                          Buy eBook
                                          Buy Modelur
                                          Buy Vertex Tools
                                          Buy SketchCuisine
                                          Buy FormFonts

                                          Advertisement