SketchUp 2013 Gripes & Bitchin' ONLY ;)
-
@numerobis said:
This must be the "many improvements under the hood" you're experiencing now...
Yeah... I really love the term "improvements under the hood"...
It is such a mysterious expression, leaving the user puzzled in excitement...(I do actually acknowledge that such improvements are important and in many cases lead to subsequent improvements, which are more obvious to the user...)
-
Are you all submitting these BugSplats? I hope so, because otherwise there is no way for the SketchUp team to tell how widespread it is. Submit all of them.
-
I only use a few plugins, basically because I have too little confidence in the stability of the core program. If this is addressed and the control of plugins can be increased so that ONLY stable plugins get anywhere near publishing, I will reconsider.
Until then my use of sketchup will remain low. Not confident of these happening as the feedback from the sketchup dev team has not met expectaions. In other words until they do what they say I cannot trust them to tell the truth and deal with the issues we ALL need fixed.
-
Received latest sketchupdate email. I'm not sure if replies go to the bit-bucket, but this is my response.
"Subscription model is a nasty surprise. An annual fee, an annual update, needed or not, and the subscription rolls on. I don't mind paying for updates with identified benefits, but this is a "Trust us, it will be great" change, and Trimble have no track record to validate that trust."
The subscription model requires a degree of trust as its an upfront payment, in expectation of features and bugfixes. Google had built a degree of credibility, and some trust. Trimble? For them, it's a great business model. For the customer? Not so much. As current version & plugins work well for me, I'll sit on v8, but look into alternatives.
-
I am shocked that Trimble has not chimed in at all yet.
2013 lacks anything of substance. In all honesty we have no motivation to upgrade. Autodesk and Adobe will at least make the price of upgrade worth it by adding some toys for us.
Like seriously, they couldn't add a single new eye catching feature? We had 5 maintenance releases to fix bugs and this is just another, call it M6. I thought for sure they would have included a simple render engine to toss in some kind of new GI lighting and reflective materials feature or maybe incorporate a new UVW mapping system. Nothing? Not even new Styles? I am glad that my name is still installed with SketchUp though. Still there in the Styles Competition Winners from 2008. Just goes to show you what has been updated.
-
@valerostudio said:
I am shocked that Trimble has not chimed in at all yet.
http://sketchucation.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=52625&view=unread#p477730
-
@thomthom said:
@valerostudio said:
I am shocked that Trimble has not chimed in at all yet.
http://sketchucation.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=52625&view=unread#p477730
More like a "Ding" then a "Chime"
-
@thomthom said:
Which incidentally match the point of time where Google bought SketchUp...
of course it will match with the time when google bought it. Developing sketchup was never in the agenda of google. all it wanted was to buy sketchup for its google earth and 3d city maps. when the purpose was solved to great extent, they sold it off. now it is to be seen that what agenda trimble is serving it sketchup... and with current release of sketchup 2013, it is pretty much clear that developing this software dosn't seem to be in their agenda too. lets see.
-
I just went by the "official" SketchUp forums -- if you ever needed another reason to support SketchUcation you should check it out.
Anybody who has anything negative to say about SketchUp 9 gets beat down by the SketchUp zombies -- as if any rational and intelligent person would not be at least slightly offended by what SketchUp is selling as an "update".
The defensiveness I see is such a clear indication of that -- after all, if it was such a great update all you would have to do is list the awesome new features that make it worthwhile, rather than trying to shore up your position by playing the puppet for "darlings" misinformation and relying on peoples gullibility to grand future hopes and dreams (which will most likely never materialize).
I often wonder if they are trying to fool us, or themselves.
Best,
Jason. -
@jason_maranto said:
I just went by the "official" SketchUp forums -- if you ever needed another reason to support SketchUcation you should check it out.
Anybody who has anything negative to say about SketchUp 9 gets beat down by the SketchUp zombies -- as if any rational and intelligent person would not be at least slightly offended by what SketchUp is selling as an "update".
The defensiveness I see is such a clear indication of that -- after all, if it was such a great update all you would have to do is list the awesome new features that make it worthwhile, rather than trying to shore up your position by playing the puppet for "darlings" misinformation and relying on peoples gullibility to grand future hopes and dreams (which will most likely never materialize).
I often wonder if they are trying to fool us, or themselves.
Best,
Jason.Thanks for the vote of confidence in SketchUcation Jason.
Yes, things can get a little rough over at the SketchUp Forum if one voices an opinion that does not fit in with one particular Mod's take on things. I won't mention any names but this particular Mod is very agressive and quite insulting to paying customers. I am quite surprised that he remains a Mod. If he was a Mod here I imagine he would be asked to either sort himself out or leave by his fellow Mods. But again, he would never become a Mod here as he simply hasn't got what it takes!
I still have 'faith' that we will see some 'grand future hopes' materialize at some date but then again I hope to win the Lotto
As regards, 'I often wonder if they are trying to fool us, or themselves', I don't think its a case of anyone trying to fool anyone, us (customers) or themselves. I think its more a case SU having to fit into a the Trimble business model. Fair enough, this business model may not be to our (customers) liking and if it comes down to it, many of the TSU Team's liking either but thats life and if you want to eat you have to toe the line!
For me, its just a great pity that this particular launch was not beter planned and implemented. A little openness with the hard core supporters would have gone a long way. By openness I mean, telling it like it is, not putting a face on matters that simply does not stack up for many seasoned SU users. SU seasoned users wish the best for SU and do NOT without good reason complain and when they do, there IS SOMETHING WRONG that should be seriously listened to and rectified.
Mike
-
There's an OFFICIAL SketchUp forum?
-
-
If you guys mean the groups forum that you get to from the Trimble page, EEeeeeeeeek what a horrible forum, difficult to navigate, few answers, lots of pointless posts. Is there a more Official one? I do vaguely remember another forum when I first got SU but came here pretty quick and never went back.
-
A Complaint Is a Gift: Recovering Customer Loyalty When Things Go Wrong
Great book. Anyone in contact with clients should read it!
-
A quote (from the 'official' forum):
"There appear to be at least two main factors that will prevent you from achieving proficiency with SU unless you start making some changes in your attitude and approach to learning:
Your failure to read the documentation--which would tell you the correct procedure to follow when using the Measurements toolbar Your sullen unwillingness or inability to communicate your exact situation--which would allow you to receive effective help from others."Can you imagine a mod ever speaking to a new user like that at Skechucation?
The AutoCAD boards used to be like this - a couple of 'bull's roamed the forums 7 days a week shouting down anyone suspected of not thoroughly reading the manual (770 or so pages long) before posting a question. It was an awful place and the very last resort if you needed to know something about AutoCAD. Fortunately now, with the Internet, you can avoid that forum altogether just by typing in a query in Google.
Makes you understand (and value) the concept of 'community' - which means people helping one another.
-
@arail1 said:
Can you imagine a mod ever speaking to a new user like that at Skechucation?
Yes. Making an effort to describe what the problem is instead of shouting "It's not working" is vital in getting any assistance. I get that all the time - "It's not working!!!" - often with more grief towards me or the tool itself. And the only thing I can reply with is asking them to provide more info. And there are repeaters who consistently fail to give any useful information to what their problem is - in which case such a response is a valid one IMO. I found that quote to be constructive feedback.
-
@thomthom said:
@arail1 said:
Can you imagine a mod ever speaking to a new user like that at Skechucation?
Yes. Making an effort to describe what the problem is instead of shouting "It's not working" is vital in getting any assistance. I get that all the time - "It's not working!!!" - often with more grief towards me or the tool itself. And the only thing I can reply with is asking them to provide more info. And there are repeaters who consistently fail to give any useful information to what their problem is - in which case such a response is a valid one IMO. I found that quote to be constructive feedback.
All due respect - much as I value your Vertex Tools I hope your beliefs as a moderator don't become standard here.
The OP described clearly what he was doing (clicking in the box). The appropriate answer therefore would be: 'Don't click in the box - that may be the obvious thing to do but it's not - initiate the tool function - then type a dimension without leaving the SkechUp field.
No need for comments about 'sullenness' or the OP's 'approach to learning' or any comments about the individual's personality or world view or anything else unrelated to the question at hand (worth pointing out - the OP leveled no such comments at the moderator).
Years ago when I needed the AutoCAD forums I always typed a comment at the top of the post asking two people to please not answer - they were the bulls that I mentioned earlier and like many who take this line, they assumed that all questions were directed at them and therefore they had a right to set 'standards'. I avoided both of them and their macho nonsense and always got good answers, more often than not form other newbies like myself (back then) and without all the attitude.
-
@arail1 said:
The OP described clearly what he was doing (clicking in the box). The appropriate answer therefore would be: 'Don't click in the box - that may be the obvious thing to do but it's not - initiate the tool function - then type a dimension without leaving the SkechUp field.
You didn't describe what the OP said. Just quoted a generic response as an example.
-
@thomthom said:
@arail1 said:
The OP described clearly what he was doing (clicking in the box). The appropriate answer therefore would be: 'Don't click in the box - that may be the obvious thing to do but it's not - initiate the tool function - then type a dimension without leaving the SkechUp field.
You didn't describe what the OP said. Just quoted a generic response as an example.
I'm not sure what you mean by 'a generic response' - it was a very specific and insulting response and, regardless of the OP's question, inappropriate. If you mean 'generic response' as in 'generic to that moderator' then yes, that is characteristic of his replies. Which largely determines the overall 'feel' of that forum.
-
I meant: You posted a quoted response without posting the source of what it responded to. So I commented on the response in a general context - where it would be a valid one as there are many who utterly fail, often repeatedly, to provide any information one can use to respond to.
Now, if the OP had sufficiently described the question then off course the quoted response would not be fit. But taken out of context it was impossible to comment on that specific instance.
That's why I interpreted the complain about the response in a general context.
Advertisement