[REQ] Edge 2 Groove
-
right.. drawing all the pieces to subtract can be the part that takes the longest.
one thing to note, if you do end up going that route, is that you can have multiple solids inside a group and it will still count as a single solid. (so the Boolean action can happen once instead of doing each 'C' (in this case) individually.).. it can't be soild groups inside a group though.. all raw geometry inside one single group.
in other words.. draw two unconnected cubes.. group them together.. these cubes will be recognized as a solid group and can be used with the solid tools.
good luck.
-
I can think of so many different applications for this kind of tool. For tiles, bricks, wooden flooring etc, etc, it'll be a great time saver.
-
@unknownuser said:
right.. drawing all the pieces to subtract can be the part that takes the longest.
one thing to note, if you do end up going that route, is that you can have multiple solids inside a group and it will still count as a single solid. (so the Boolean action can happen once instead of doing each 'C' (in this case) individually.).. it can't be soild groups inside a group though.. all raw geometry inside one single group.
in other words.. draw two unconnected cubes.. group them together.. these cubes will be recognized as a solid group and can be used with the solid tools.
good luck.
True, ultimately it may just easier to automate the cutting object process through ruby. Something like "Lines to cube tube" Something like Didier's "Lines to Tubes" except that it will create 4 sided solid cutting object or shelled multiple objects. Unfortunately free users would not benefit from this. I wish Profile Builder worked on multiple paths at the same time.
-
In my sens for a Rubyman
Just modify the "Multiple face offset" with only 2 lateral sides against 4 ! So a special offset!
And my first trick will be quasi perfect!
But there are surely another possibilities
Cool headache
-
@unknownuser said:
what you've done can be achieved with a single tool - "Protrude" from Jim.
Effectively!
Can you post you your example in V6 ?
Does has "internal faces" ? -
@unknownuser said:
Effectively!
Can you post you your example in V6 ?
Does has "internal faces" ?Sorry Pilou...don't have V6 installed anymore. See shots from V8. The internal faces are removed.
The protrude tool (http://sketchuptips.blogspot.com/2007/10/plugin-protrude.html ) is effective for doing flat surface grooves such as hardwood flooring, etc. It's where the groove has to turn a corner that is the issue. I wonder if it could be adapted to do the same thing, but instead of regular offset and push pull, use the Offset on Surface method and Joint Push pull. This would allow you to soften the corners, then the tool could just offset the grooves and JPP the faces.
-
@unknownuser said:
I wish Profile Builder worked on multiple paths at the same time.
it does.. select all the lines then use the 2nd icon (build along path followme.. or smthg like that)
the problem however is going to be that the vertical tubes won't orient properly in your drawing.. they'll all be on the XY instead of rotating.
-
@unknownuser said:
@unknownuser said:
I wish Profile Builder worked on multiple paths at the same time.
it does.. select all the lines then use the 2nd icon (build along path followme.. or smthg like that)
Doesn't seem to work on multiple closed edge loops, i.e. the test model I posted. Although you are right, on non closed edge loops, multiple selections does work, which is great. Creating the profile from middle and then outer shelling them makes a great groove cutting group, even with curves.
-
@earthmover said:
@unknownuser said:
@unknownuser said:
I wish Profile Builder worked on multiple paths at the same time.
it does.. select all the lines then use the 2nd icon (build along path followme.. or smthg like that)
Doesn't seem to work on multiple closed edge loops, i.e. the test model I posted. Although you are right, on non closed edge loops, multiple selections does work, which is great. Creating the profile from middle and then outer shelling them makes a great groove cutting group, even with curves.
oh. my bad. I'm on a phone today with only a slight memory of seeing your model last night
I thought the grooves were Cs instead of rectangles. -
@unknownuser said:
Sorry Pilou...don't have V6 installed anymore.
Last V8 don't permit Save as V6 ?
The viewer V8 don't work on my old computer!
-
I remember also, just can't seem to find it.
Actually support for adjoining faces which are not coplanar would be preferable.
I would like to add groves to something like the following -
-
@unknownuser said:
@unknownuser said:
Sorry Pilou...don't have V6 installed anymore.
Last V8 don't permit Save as V6 ?
The viewer V8 don't work on my old computer!
Sorry Pilou, I misunderstood. I updated the test model saved as V6.
-
No Problem
Many Thanks !
In therory if the there no special element like DC or other news it's better to save in V6
As like, V6, V7, V8 users can reload it -
Do you have v8 installed? Surely you must...
-
In my plugin, the top groove is not a problem. But the side grooves either cross or diverge when pushpulled due to the faces not being coplanar.
as the image shows.
-
Yes but on other computer
I have this old one (ten years) for test some programs for old configs for some coders -
@ EarthMover
Why your model has no bottom faces?
That will not solids! So possibilitiy to use boolean operation will be forbidden! -
So the plug is not optimized
Keep the good work!
I have not yet found a super trick with plugs existing
It's not very easy to select only the section between "elements" for some tricky actions
And carreful here you have quadrangular sections, but your plug must work with any polygonal "sections" !
So regular PushPull will not work! -
Curiously the Select Lines by Length By Chris Fulmer don't work with your object
-
As sdmitch has found, doing it programmatically is fraught with challenges...
Advertisement