sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    โ„น๏ธ Licensed Extensions | FredoBatch, ElevationProfile, FredoSketch, LayOps, MatSim and Pic2Shape will require license from Sept 1st More Info

    Let's have a Hardware speed test for SU

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware, Software & Gadgets
    132 Posts 72 Posters 81.9k Views 72 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • jujuJ Offline
      juju
      last edited by

      SU 8.0.4811

      juju.jpg

      juju pc.jpg

      Save the Earth, it's the only planet with chocolate.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • KrisidiousK Offline
        Krisidious
        last edited by

        mine... I'm depressed, although I do have 4 monitors.

        test.jpg

        By: Kristoff Rand
        Home DesignerUnique House Plans

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • B Offline
          bentleykfrog
          last edited by

          Wow, some unusual results here. I've had some discrepancy between Sketchup v.8.0.4811 and Sketchup v.7.1.6860

          Under v.7.1.6860 I got:
          Sketchup 7.1.6860 test result
          But under v.8.0.4811 I got:
          Sketchup 8.0.4811 test result
          After some troubleshooting, I found that disabling "Enable Transparency" in the Styles window gave this result in v.8.0.4811:
          Sketchup 8.0.4811 (No Transparency) test result
          Its unusual, I disabled "Enable Transparency" under 7.1.6860 and there was no noticable difference in the animations performance, but this is different for 8.0.4811. I'm not sure what is going on here but for consistency in results I think the style in the file should be updated to disable the transparency.

          Here's my stats:
          Mac Pro (1,1) with a modified 8 core x5355 @ 2.66 GHz (2 processors)
          16gb DDR2 ECC ram
          Ati Radeon HD 5770 (apple version)
          SATA II
          Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M Offline
            Masta Squidge
            last edited by

            since i like this kind of stuff...

            Q6600 quad core @ 3.2 GHZ.
            EVGA GTX465SC core unlocked to 448 cores and overclocked 10%

            No shadows:
            sutest.PNG

            Shadows:
            sutest_shadows.PNG

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • M Offline
              masrulpilami
              last edited by

              does anyone know how to test it in SU8?=D

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • thomthomT Offline
                thomthom
                last edited by

                @masrulpilami said:

                does anyone know how to test it in SU8?=D

                Exactly the same as in SketchUp 7

                Thomas Thomassen โ€” SketchUp Monkey & Coding addict
                List of my plugins and link to the CookieWare fund

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • KrisidiousK Offline
                  Krisidious
                  last edited by

                  new upgrade... I5 2500k with 2 GTX 470s

                  Capture.JPG
                  1 gtx 470

                  Capture2.JPG
                  2 gtx 470 running sli

                  stats
                  Capture3.jpg

                  By: Kristoff Rand
                  Home DesignerUnique House Plans

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • bazB Offline
                    baz
                    last edited by

                    New puter. I think the graphics card is letting me down cos results are similiar to older machines.
                    Shadows offShadows onClipboard02.jpg

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • KrisidiousK Offline
                      Krisidious
                      last edited by

                      well baz that perplexed me. becuase if I'm not mistaken the GeForce 210 is a rather low end card right? like $50.00? and your score is smoking mine. so I figuired it had to be the I7 2600... but I'm running the I52500k unlocked at like 4.8ghz... although you seem to have 8 cores... you'll have to inform me on how that is? but anyway. I went into the nvidia control panel under 3D settings and turned everything up on the global settings...

                      Capture5.JPG

                      this improved my score by 100%

                      Capture4.JPG

                      I would be interested to know if the rest of you have these settings turned on... if my assumption is correct, the FPS in SketchUp comes more from the CPU than the video card.

                      Baz, do you have hardware acceleration on?

                      By: Kristoff Rand
                      Home DesignerUnique House Plans

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • bazB Offline
                        baz
                        last edited by

                        Hi Kris, yes h/ware acceleration is on. Also I never touch the card properties, I choose 'let the application decide'. I have no idea why it's showing 8 cores. And yes the card is budget.
                        baz

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • jarynzlesaJ Offline
                          jarynzlesa
                          last edited by

                          I think I am a winner ๐Ÿ˜„ .


                          test_time_display.jpg

                          http://www.vizualizaceschodiste.mypage.cz/

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • bazB Offline
                            baz
                            last edited by

                            @jarynzlesa said:

                            I think I am a winner ๐Ÿ˜„ .

                            That was with shadows off? It looks like it.

                            In Australia we'd probly call you 'a battler' ๐Ÿ˜„
                            Which is a good thing, but it means you are doing it hard.

                            Re: your avatar, which I've only just noticed... "mieowww". โ˜€

                            baz

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • bazB Offline
                              baz
                              last edited by

                              While we are at it, shall we try this test as well?
                              This topic, http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?p=18909#p18909 gets into it.
                              But basically its an expotential increase in entities and materials thru scenes 1 to 11.
                              The referenced post reports wireframing at varied scenes and 'choppiness' when orbiting.

                              This 4yo lappie cuts grass on the animation but it wireframed on scene 7 in orbit or hand. So I reckon it needs another 13 scenes to give it a real whirl. (I just tried to add scene 12 with a doubling of those lost people but SU has frozen).

                              (still frozen).

                              This test seems a bit subjective, for example, wireframing when orbiting is dependent on mouse speed, but p'raps someone could come up with an empirical test.

                              I guess I'm interested in 'Best performance' settings.

                              Screen shot at Scene 11.


                              Open and 'PLAY ANIMATION' in scene tabs. Also 'orbit' in tabs.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • brodieB Offline
                                brodie
                                last edited by

                                I wonder if the behavior I'm seeing in the speed test model is the same as what anyone else getting...

                                If I open the model and run the test a few times, I get around 25fps.
                                Then I turn on shadows and get around 62fps.
                                Then I turn off shadows and get around 62fps.

                                Anyone else see this? Maybe this has something to do with SU 8? With shadows on when I run the ruby it basically turns the shadows off and zooms around it's orbit and then pops them back on. The even weirder thing though is when I turn the shadows back off, so it's in the same state as it was originally and the fps goes from 25 up to 62.

                                [computer specs are in my signature below]

                                -Brodie

                                steelblue http://www.steelbluellc.com

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • KrisidiousK Offline
                                  Krisidious
                                  last edited by

                                  yes Brodie... after retesting I get the same results... my jump to 63 frames was not the 3D settings config... it was shadows on and off.

                                  By: Kristoff Rand
                                  Home DesignerUnique House Plans

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • S Offline
                                    ScottPara
                                    last edited by

                                    Here's my test

                                    I have not tweaked any settings and I am not running any overclocking.

                                    Scott


                                    1.jpg


                                    2.jpg

                                    Love the fact that some HATE my avatar.....

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • brodieB Offline
                                      brodie
                                      last edited by

                                      nice setup. this proves my theory that the windows experience score is a bit silly. it should be some sort of average rather than taking your lowest score. Not that it matters I guess.

                                      -brodie

                                      steelblue http://www.steelbluellc.com

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • S Offline
                                        sketchyKev
                                        last edited by

                                        @unknownuser said:

                                        I wonder if the behavior I'm seeing in the speed test model is the same as what anyone else getting...

                                        If I open the model and run the test a few times, I get around 25fps.
                                        Then I turn on shadows and get around 62fps.
                                        Then I turn off shadows and get around 62fps.

                                        Anyone else see this? Maybe this has something to do with SU 8? With shadows on when I run the ruby it basically turns the shadows off and zooms around it's orbit and then pops them back on. The even weirder thing though is when I turn the shadows back off, so it's in the same state as it was originally and the fps goes from 25 up to 62.

                                        I have noticed a similar behaviour. If I run the first test with shadows on, I get around 21 fps with the large shadow cast on the ground displayed while orbiting and then on the second run I get around 31 fps but this time the large shadow is missing but the light/dark shading of individual spheres is still there. Now if I turn shadows off I get 31 fps and all subsequent tests achieve around around 31 fps with shadows on or off but the large shadow cat on the ground during orbiting never returns unless I restart Sketchup. For some reason this behaviour only happens if I start Sketchup by clicking on the test file rather than starting Sketchup and then loading the file.

                                        The size of the display and the size of the window Sketchup is running in also makes a difference. Some older systems with slower CPUs and GPUs and low end laptops may seem to perform well relative to newer faster systems because they have lower resolution displays.

                                        Here are some test runs on my system at 1980x1080 resolution (fullscreen):

                                        1)Shadows ON: 20.8 fps (Shadow on ground during orbiting)
                                        2)Shadows ON: 30.9 fps (No shadow on ground during orbiting)
                                        3)Shadows OFF: 30.6 fps
                                        4)Shadows ON: 30.6 fps (No shadow on ground during orbiting)

                                        These tests run with screen resolution set at 1280x1024 (fullscreen):

                                        1)Shadows ON: 25.7 fps (Shadow on ground during orbiting)
                                        2)Shadows ON: 42.1 fps (No shadow on ground during orbiting)
                                        3)Shadows OFF: 42.2 fps
                                        4)Shadows ON: 42.5 fps (No shadow on ground during orbiting)

                                        Final tests run at 1980x1080 resolution but Sketchup window only occupying about a 1/3 of the screen:

                                        1)Shadows ON: 29.4 fps (Shadow on ground during orbiting)
                                        2)Shadows ON: 55.5 fps (No shadow on ground during orbiting)
                                        3)Shadows OFF: 53.9 fps
                                        4)Shadows ON: 56.7 fps (No shadow on ground during orbiting)

                                        To make more meaningful comparisons of different systems we probably need to know the resolution of the screens used, whether or not the test is fullscreen and whether or not large shadows on the ground are still displayed while orbiting.

                                        This is my system running SU8:

                                        • 2.6 GHz AMD Athlon II X4 620 Quad core CPU
                                        • ATI Radeon HD 4200 (256Mb) GPU
                                        • 3Gb RAM
                                        • Windows 7 Home (32 bit)
                                        • Primary monitor resolution 1920x1080
                                        • DirectX 10

                                        P.S. Anyone fancy having a shot at this alternative test I started here http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?f=72&t=37045 . It does require you have the SketchyPhysics plugin but it will test different aspects of your system and maybe provide a challenge.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • N Offline
                                          Neko14
                                          last edited by

                                          My spec:
                                          Intel Core 2 Duo E4300 1.86 GHz
                                          4GB DDR2 RAM, 800MHz
                                          Asus nVidia GTS 450 1GB DDR5 (Asus overclocked it by default)
                                          Sketchup Pro 8.0.48
                                          OpenGL Acceleration: ON

                                          Result

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • Jean LemireJ Offline
                                            Jean Lemire
                                            last edited by

                                            Hi folks.

                                            I did some test with this file. I first ran the test with shadows off. Then I turned shadows on and got a faster time ๐Ÿ˜ฎ I turned shadows off again and I got an even faster time ๐Ÿ˜ฎ ๐Ÿ˜ฎ Go figure.

                                            Here are the results:

                                            On my 2 years old Dell Precision Workstation with a 2.667 GHz processor and 12 Gigs of RAM with a NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 with 1 Gb of VRAM, I get 63 f/s (frames per second) with shadows off and 53 f/s with shadows on. This is the machine I use at work.

                                            With my one month old Mac Book Pro with i7 processor at 2.2 GHz and 8 Gigs RAM with a AMD Radeon HD 6750 with 1 Gb of VRAM, I get 58.4 f/s with shadows off and 47.5 f/s with shadows on using SU 8 on Mac OS X (Snow Leopard) and 61.9 f/s with shadows off and 54.1 f/s with shadows on using SU 8 with Windows 7 on Bootcamp.

                                            Just ideas.

                                            Jean (Johnny) Lemire from Repentigny, Quebec, Canada.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 5
                                            • 6
                                            • 7
                                            • 5 / 7
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Buy SketchPlus
                                            Buy SUbD
                                            Buy WrapR
                                            Buy eBook
                                            Buy Modelur
                                            Buy Vertex Tools
                                            Buy SketchCuisine
                                            Buy FormFonts

                                            Advertisement