Let's have a Hardware speed test for SU

glenn · 1 Sept 2010, 21:46

Hey,
Anyone try this test with SU8 yet?
I"m interested to see speed compared to 7.1
Thanks,
Glenn

bmike · 2 Sept 2010, 13:52

@glenn said:

Hey,
Anyone try this test with SU8 yet?
I"m interested to see speed compared to 7.1
Thanks,
Glenn

tried. does not work, get an argument error.
looks like the file / code will need to tweak.

pmolsen · 14 Sept 2010, 22:57

Ran it successfully on SU7.1 and SU8. Medion akoya MD97310 (from Aldi). 15.4 fps on SU7.1. 27.6 fps on SU8.

naikrovek · 10 Nov 2010, 21:02

SketchUp 8:

Not bad for a $500 PC and $50 video card.

Wo3Dan · 24 Dec 2010, 08:52

How come my old dusty machine is performing rather well? / what am I doing "wrong"?
(PC=5.5 years of age, almost retired)

Micromaxx/Medion
AMD Athlon 64/3000+
Clockspeed 2.00GHz 1.5GB
NVIDIA GeForce FX5700

With SU8 pro (didn't test SU7) and testing the original file:

nothing changed (hidden geometry and shadows off) => around ~62.7 frames/second
(shadows on didn't seem to matter that much, same results => ~62.5 frames/second)
2)edges+profiles on, hidden geometry (and shadows) displayed => ~35.8 frames/second

~ indicates that I did run the code line multiple times.
After changes to settings like 'hidden geometry' only the first run drops down frame rate.
After that a constant higher rate as stated above.

fuzzion · 10 Jan 2011, 01:28

To lazy to cut n paste.

72 frames displayed in 3.963sev
Avg. frames = 0.055 seconds
18.3 frames/sec

System spec

2 year old FX gateway laptop

64bit VIsta
6gb 1066mhz dual chan ram
centrino 2, dual core 2.33ghz , not sure about fsb
9800 GTS 1GB Nvidia card
Intel Chipset

mac1 · 10 Jan 2011, 06:03

wo3dan
So much for all the hype about new machines. Are you running on a AGP_ bus also? Try toggling the transparency select on the face styles and see if it makes much difference. It did for me
fussion
It appears you are running too slow for these test conditions. Do you have problems with model display?? Suggest you run the GLview 322.exe and see what type of OpenGL you really have. Also toggle the transparency on the face styles and see if that makes any difference for you. My testing showed the extents of the model play a roll. Make sure to hit zoom extents before running test

juju · 20 Jan 2011, 18:03

SU 8.0.4811

Krisidious · 20 Jan 2011, 18:48

mine... I'm depressed, although I do have 4 monitors.

bentleykfrog · 5 Mar 2011, 06:18

Wow, some unusual results here. I've had some discrepancy between Sketchup v.8.0.4811 and Sketchup v.7.1.6860

Under v.7.1.6860 I got:

But under v.8.0.4811 I got:

After some troubleshooting, I found that disabling "Enable Transparency" in the Styles window gave this result in v.8.0.4811:

Its unusual, I disabled "Enable Transparency" under 7.1.6860 and there was no noticable difference in the animations performance, but this is different for 8.0.4811. I'm not sure what is going on here but for consistency in results I think the style in the file should be updated to disable the transparency.

Here's my stats:
Mac Pro (1,1) with a modified 8 core x5355 @ 2.66 GHz (2 processors)
16gb DDR2 ECC ram
Ati Radeon HD 5770 (apple version)
SATA II
Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit

Masta Squidge · 29 Mar 2011, 00:07

since i like this kind of stuff...

Q6600 quad core @ 3.2 GHZ.
EVGA GTX465SC core unlocked to 448 cores and overclocked 10%

No shadows:

Shadows:

masrulpilami · 12 Apr 2011, 07:32

does anyone know how to test it in SU8?=D

thomthom · 12 Apr 2011, 08:09

@masrulpilami said:

does anyone know how to test it in SU8?=D

Exactly the same as in SketchUp 7

Krisidious · 10 May 2011, 10:12

new upgrade... I5 2500k with 2 GTX 470s

1 gtx 470

2 gtx 470 running sli

stats

baz · 11 May 2011, 01:17

New puter. I think the graphics card is letting me down cos results are similiar to older machines.

Krisidious · 11 May 2011, 05:35

well baz that perplexed me. becuase if I'm not mistaken the GeForce 210 is a rather low end card right? like $50.00? and your score is smoking mine. so I figuired it had to be the I7 2600... but I'm running the I52500k unlocked at like 4.8ghz... although you seem to have 8 cores... you'll have to inform me on how that is? but anyway. I went into the nvidia control panel under 3D settings and turned everything up on the global settings...

this improved my score by 100%

I would be interested to know if the rest of you have these settings turned on... if my assumption is correct, the FPS in SketchUp comes more from the CPU than the video card.

Baz, do you have hardware acceleration on?

baz · 11 May 2011, 05:58

Hi Kris, yes h/ware acceleration is on. Also I never touch the card properties, I choose 'let the application decide'. I have no idea why it's showing 8 cores. And yes the card is budget.
baz

jarynzlesa · 11 May 2011, 08:53

I think I am a winner .

baz · 11 May 2011, 09:16

@jarynzlesa said:

I think I am a winner .

That was with shadows off? It looks like it.

In Australia we'd probly call you 'a battler'
Which is a good thing, but it means you are doing it hard.

Re: your avatar, which I've only just noticed... "mieowww".

baz

baz · 11 May 2011, 13:55

While we are at it, shall we try this test as well?
This topic, http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?p=18909#p18909 gets into it.
But basically its an expotential increase in entities and materials thru scenes 1 to 11.
The referenced post reports wireframing at varied scenes and 'choppiness' when orbiting.

This 4yo lappie cuts grass on the animation but it wireframed on scene 7 in orbit or hand. So I reckon it needs another 13 scenes to give it a real whirl. (I just tried to add scene 12 with a doubling of those lost people but SU has frozen).

(still frozen).

This test seems a bit subjective, for example, wireframing when orbiting is dependent on mouse speed, but p'raps someone could come up with an empirical test.

I guess I'm interested in 'Best performance' settings.

Open and 'PLAY ANIMATION' in scene tabs. Also 'orbit' in tabs.