Let's have a Hardware speed test for SU

ely862me · 24 Jun 2009, 11:27

phoa..my computer is very slow.. i think my problem is memory i have only 1 gb(graphic card 1gb nvidia 8600gt,processor pentium dual core 2.8 ghz)

here is the test with shadow on..and with shadow off it was about 8.7 sec

gamore · 24 Jun 2009, 11:30

it seams that sketchup depends on cpu clock more than videocard performance and multicore cpu

Khai · 24 Jun 2009, 12:10

here we go - Windows XP 32bit SR3 - I'll boot into Windows 7 64 later and post a test from there.

troyhome · 24 Jun 2009, 13:23

A MacBook Pro weighs in...

dale · 24 Jun 2009, 16:00

I'm at home today on my old G4 Mac Laptop.
Yikes ...I'd test with shadows on, but I can't afford to take a couple of hours off.
Have to try on my work machines tomorrow.

caronte01 · 25 Jun 2009, 01:09

Ok, here,s mine, a 2.5 years white macbook:

chango70 · 25 Jun 2009, 03:00

14.0 frames/sec

Which is annoying since i bought a £600 Quadro FX3700. Probably better off with a game card.

Rest of the system

CPU i7 720
6G Ram

gamore · 25 Jun 2009, 03:49

maybe Quadro or FireGl can get hight score

chango70 · 25 Jun 2009, 05:18

@unknownuser said:

maybe Quadro or FireGl can get hight score

That IS the result with a Quadro card.

dylan · 26 Jun 2009, 09:34

My MacBook Pro has exactly the same spec as troyhome.
2.93 Duo
9600 GT

P.S I love this machine

Gaieus · 26 Jun 2009, 11:50

I think the best test would be to test something like this (with shadows and heavy textures and everything that taxes the GPU much) with different graphics cards but on the same system.

Something that we won't obviously do...

EscapeArtist · 27 Jun 2009, 12:41

Wow. I got 21 FPS in a previous post without turning shadows on, I figured I'd give it a shot with shadows to see what happens. SU shadows are nasty, apparently:

That's a pretty serious hit.

TIG · 27 Jun 2009, 15:17

My PC is an Advent Intel Core2 Quad 2.4GHz with 4Mb RAM - Vista SP2, NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS
Without's OK... but with shadows !

chango70 · 27 Jun 2009, 16:37

@escapeartist said:

Wow. I got 21 FPS in a previous post without turning shadows on, I figured I'd give it a shot with shadows to see what happens. SU shadows are nasty, apparently:

That's a pretty serious hit.

Thats high! What is your setup?

EscapeArtist · 27 Jun 2009, 19:15

It's way back at post #8 on page 1, but here ya go:

E8400 Core Duo
EVGA 9800GTX+ x 2 in SLi
4 GB OCZ RAM
EVGA 780i FTW
WinXP SP3

Nothing overclocked.

diana · 1 Jul 2009, 01:54

Sony Vaio VGNFS660W laptop, which I've had for almost four years.
Intel Pentium M Processor 740 (1.73GHz1 , 2MB L2 Cache)
1GB PC-2700 333MHz DDR (512MB x 2)
NVIDIA GeForce Go 6200 with TurboCache supporting
128MB (NVIDIA TurboCache technology combines the size and
bandwidth of video memory and dynamically available
WinXP Home SP2

Wacov · 5 Jul 2009, 12:11

Using a Q6600 at 2.4GhZ, 4GB DDR2 RAM, and a GTX 295:

I reckon I'm let down by my CPU clock. I get 2.5 FPS with shadows... and up to 15 FPS by making my SU window insanely small ^_^

Gaieus · 28 Jul 2009, 11:05

New machine:

3.0 GHz Dual core CPU
nVidia 9600 (1Gb) GPU
4Gb RAM
Windows XP SP3 (32 bit)

Did I tell you that I like this new computer?
And even my girlfriend likes it as it has a nice box/house, too (with a 22" Samsung monitor)

chango70 · 28 Jul 2009, 12:07

@escapeartist said:

It's way back at post #8 on page 1, but here ya go:

E8400 Core Duo
EVGA 9800GTX+ x 2 in SLi
4 GB OCZ RAM
EVGA 780i FTW
WinXP SP3

Nothing overclocked.

Hmmm. I didn't realise SU can take advantage of SLi setup. I read that it doesn't even scale linearly in most games. Apparently it does scale with SU. Otherwise GTX 280 from Solo's setup would have achieved higher score.

Rich O Brien · 28 Jul 2009, 12:17

Here's my result on an old laptop that's slowly dying

Dell Latitude D400
Intel Pentium M 1700Mhz
1GB RAM
Intel 82855 GME Graphics Controller