sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    ℹ️ Licensed Extensions | FredoBatch, ElevationProfile, FredoSketch, LayOps, MatSim and Pic2Shape will require license from Sept 1st More Info

    What is going on here??

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved SketchUp Discussions
    sketchup
    18 Posts 9 Posters 1.5k Views 9 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S Offline
      sepo
      last edited by

      Quite interesting but difficult to control.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • jeff hammondJ Offline
        jeff hammond
        last edited by

        shouldn't it act like this though?

        http://homepage.mac.com/jeffhammond/.Public/scf/expected.mov

        i should be able to return to the original shape like i just showed in that video.

        dotdotdot

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • gillesG Offline
          gilles
          last edited by

          The strange whith this is that it only works whith shapes based on arc or circle, whatever the number of segments. when you draw the same shape with the pencil tool deformations are "regular".This is weird (but great).
          Manifestation of God in SU?

          " c'est curieux chez les marins ce besoin de faire des phrases "

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • jeff hammondJ Offline
            jeff hammond
            last edited by

            hmm. I'm not so sure about that.

            Click on the very first link in this thread. The conversation has picked up over there.
            I just posted a picture showing what happens if the curve is no longer recognized as an arc

            [edit]. Oh, I should add that while the wiggling of the rotate tool might be a glitch, the same shape can be arrived at by rotating to ~180 deg.
            This shape isn't happening due to that weird pump action of the rotate tool.

            dotdotdot

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Wo3DanW Offline
              Wo3Dan
              last edited by

              @gilles said:

              The strange whith this is that it only works whith shapes based on arc or circle, .......

              I've got it to work with curves as well.
              See attached file.
              I started with an arc. Exploded it. Applied the smoove tool get the first deformation to be sure there wasn't an arc left. Welded it into one curve. P/P the enclosed face several times with P/P+Ctrl.
              Divided the edges underneath through their midpoints.
              Selected these lines (blue in model).
              Applied the rotate tool in green direction as shown in model.
              This is just on example out of thousands what you can achieve.
              Notice that curves remain (scaled) curves just as circles do.

              Wo3Dan


              Smooth_curve_deformation.skp

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • J Offline
                Jim57
                last edited by

                It beats me why this works. Best I can see, it's a glitch in SU. It works from trying to rotate a line in a direction that it can't rotate in, and the result is a deformation in a different plane than the one the Rotate tool is calling.

                It took me a while to notice that the trick is to bind the Rotate tool (second click) normal to the line being rotated. Jeff Hammond's last example shows the line itself being rotated, instead the normal (perpendicular) getting rotated.

                Interesting!

                JIm

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • P Offline
                  putnik
                  last edited by

                  Jeff, I'm unable to open the original Qglitch.zip on Windows..

                  http://keshas.info

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • jeff hammondJ Offline
                    jeff hammond
                    last edited by

                    @putnik said:

                    Jeff, I'm unable to open the original Qglitch.zip on Windows..

                    😳 hmm.. same here.. i can't open it either and i've since trashed the file thinking 'i have it online if i ever need it' 😄 i should check my links better.. i've been having trouble uploading to sketchucation lately hence me uploading to my .mac account..

                    it's just a skp of the jpg posted right below it...
                    here's another version of it that's basically the same thing iirc
                    glitch.skp

                    dotdotdot

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • P Offline
                      putnik
                      last edited by

                      Thanks Jeff. I too would like to know why after wiggling the Rotate tool the geometry doesn't return to its original half-cylinder shape when returning to 0 degrees deformation with the Rotate tool still active. Manipulating any other type of geometry does that.

                      Pilou, I don't think you quite understand Jeff's question. You are explaining why convex shape is created, but that's not what Jeff is asking.

                      http://keshas.info

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • E Offline
                        Ecuadorian
                        last edited by

                        Perhaps we should call Stephen Hawking?

                        -Miguel Lescano
                        Subscribe to my house plans YouTube channel! (30K+ subs)

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • jeff hammondJ Offline
                          jeff hammond
                          last edited by

                          @ecuadorian said:

                          Perhaps we should call Stephen Hawking?

                          or.. Stephen King..

                          dotdotdot

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • thomthomT Offline
                            thomthom
                            last edited by

                            @unknownuser said:

                            @ecuadorian said:

                            Perhaps we should call Stephen Hawking?

                            or.. Stephen King..

                            😮 😕

                            Thomas Thomassen — SketchUp Monkey & Coding addict
                            List of my plugins and link to the CookieWare fund

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • thomthomT Offline
                              thomthom
                              last edited by

                              Or... "if there's something strange, in your neighbourhood, who you gonna call"...?

                              Thomas Thomassen — SketchUp Monkey & Coding addict
                              List of my plugins and link to the CookieWare fund

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • 1 / 1
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              Buy SketchPlus
                              Buy SUbD
                              Buy WrapR
                              Buy eBook
                              Buy Modelur
                              Buy Vertex Tools
                              Buy SketchCuisine
                              Buy FormFonts

                              Advertisement