So your model is incorrect, the original is not a semicircle. 💚

Very sharp indeed.

Very very nice.

Thanks a bunch for the reply. I just need to use my imagination some and give it a try. Have not had my laptop on for a while and probably won’t for a while longer. At some point, I will give it a try. 👍

Excellent start. Assuming you’re going to use a texture for the weaving?

Thanks, Dave.

I would have a look at Raylectron as well.

Thanks, tuna. This one was fun. The way a visit to the dentist is fun.

Most excellent ! 👍

Excellent work ! 👍

WOW ! Great job. I’d go cross-eyed modeling that. 👍 👍

Looking good David.

Thank you, Dave.

Thank you, sir.

thanks, tuna. I'll render them one of these days . . . .

You're right, tuna: Not very practical. But attention-grabbing, yea.

"utterly impractical" I think fairly describes this piece.
However, it does look like a fun, "Why not?!" project! Good job.

I'm with you, Tuna. To my eye, the parts of the Wegner chair are better proportioned. The legs on the Ditzel chair are a bit too chunky, I think. Also, the back/armrests on the Wegner chair reflect a higher level of craft--it's three pieces connected with long finger joints and shaped almost like an airplane propellor. The Ditzel chair, not so much.

Thanks, HornOxx. I don't think the chair is too unusual in the Victorian era.