Circle Tool ... specify diameter
-
Actually if the only obstacle that does not let you use this option is that you need to enter the footage/inchage, there must be a solution for this (after all SU is developed in the States...)
-
I see that as a need too. I think even metric users would have the same problem. If I want a circle with a diameter of 4.5mm, entering 4.5/2 gives me a diameter of 9.
You are right that there isn't a good way to enter a circle with a diameter of 6 5/16". Usually, in my head I can convert it to a simple fraction of (6*16)+5/16 = 101/16 for the diameter then double the bottom number to get the radius = 101/32.
Actually if it's gotta be right and I have to do (6*16)+5 in my head, I pull up the calculator real quick to make sure I'm not screwing something up. Some combination of poor math skills and poor self confidence I guess. Regardless it's one way of accomplishing your goal.
Being able to enter mathematical equations in the VCB would be a better solution and I hope that makes it to future versions.
-
Now this is true with the decimal fractions - I've just tried (though I can imagine TIG coming up with an explanation and method about it).
Of course, as a workaround, we can always scale a circle to a specific size and the scale tool will work with its diameter but I know workarounds are just workarounds...
-
G,
I think scaling is the best/quickest "workaround".
-
6+5/16 ?
what number is that? 11/16" ?
6 5/16" -
Using decimal numbers /2 works fine... but with fractional inches it's useless... BUT the trick in halving fractional inches is the halve the whole inch part and double the fractional divisor...so...
6 5/16"
when /2 becomes
3 5/32"
It works for any combo...
BUT for 'odd' inches you do need also to add a 1/2" to the fraction, by adding the original fractional divisor !
11 7/8"
when /2 becomes
5 **8+**7/16" >> 5 15/16[/b]"
where the 1/2" is rendered as 8/16" - the 8 being the original divisor that is simply added to the top number [here 7 giving 15]...
So if you insist on using fractional inches then you need to learn some simple math tricks to halve dimensions...
Don't start going down halving fraction feet-and-inches !
-
Decimal inches are handy. You can change back when doing standard dimensioning.
-
@tig said:
So if you insist on using fractional inches then you need to learn some simple math tricks to halve dimensions...
right... though people that use fractional inches a lot generally have all that stuff ingrained in memory without needing to calculate (in the same way you know 7*8=56 without actually calculating it)
(well.. i guess we generally only have the 16ths and less ingrained.. if i start getting into 32nds and 64ths then i have to stop and think about it)..
but for me, the math trick for half of 11 7/8 would be 12/2 then subtract 1/16.. probably a lot of ways to arrive at the same answer but that's generally the way i do it on the fly..
regardless.. i think entering (11 7/8)/2 or even 11 7/8 Γ· 2 would be a lot less confusing than putting a + in the mix

[late Edit-] ah.. i see where you're putting the plus sign now.. the same place as in the example i used except i'd be putting a minus instead (11 16-1/16).. (11 & 16/16 -1/16).. not sure if id ever enter like that in the vcb but at least i see what you're talking about now

-
Personally, I think all the math workaround suggestions miss the point: computers are supposed to do the math for us so we don't have to bother with it. It is a bit ridiculous that a sophisticated program running on an expensive computer can't even do all the simple math functions of a $10 pocket calculator, much less provide a user-friendly way to accept fractional or mixed unit expressions!
This isn't rocket science. Writing the code to parse an unambiguous arithmetic expression like (2' + 4mm)/2 is something any competent programmer should be able to do without breaking a sweat. Likewise, it is not much of a challenge to write the code to recognize a trailing "d" as a diameter specifier.
-
Do not get into the habit of using /2, since SU has a significant bug: appending /2 works SOMETIMES -but only if you are dividing an integer by 2. If you type "1.5/2" you will not get a .75 radius as you expected. There is no warning in SU v.8; in fact this bug has not been fixed as of the 2014 version.
It would not be hard to parse the input line, then one could enter 6+5/16 for the mixed fraction since that's what we really mean for 6 5/16. (As we learned in 7th grade algebra, multiplication and division are always done before addition and subtraction -MDAS "My Dear Aunt Sally" rule).
It would be nice to be able to specify relative/absolute references, and variables too.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better π
Register LoginAdvertisement