sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    ℹ️ Licensed Extensions | FredoBatch, ElevationProfile, FredoSketch, LayOps, MatSim and Pic2Shape will require license from Sept 1st More Info

    Suggestion - Hobby License

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved SketchUp Discussions
    12 Posts 5 Posters 1 Views 5 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • ntxdaveN Offline
      ntxdave
      last edited by

      Interesting that I just looked on the SketchUp forum and saw this post. In some ways, it is kind of the same thing I was thinking about.

      IMO these cheaper versions they are offering are not very useful. Any version that does not support plugins is almost worthless. I have been using SU for almost 10 years and I have created very few things that did not depend on plugins. Again JMO πŸ˜„

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Gus RG Offline
        Gus R
        last edited by

        It's an interesting idea but I don't think Trimble is that kind of corporation. Their customer base is largely around infrastructure, agriculture, railroads, construction, etc. They do have the student, higher ed, and non-profit subscriptions. Outside of that and you end up being in no man's land.

        Maybe you can set up a 501(c)(3). πŸ’š

        www.instagram.com/gusrobatto/

        www.facebook.com/gusrobatto

        www.flickr.com/photos/gusrobatto

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • gullfoG Offline
          gullfo
          last edited by

          in the example - you have "pro" checked under hobby πŸ˜„ but what should be check is the ability to use extensions (plugins). so a desktop version, not pro (so no layout etc) with ability to run extensions (creating DC would be nice as well but ...)

          Glenn

          http://www.runnel.com

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • ntxdaveN Offline
            ntxdave
            last edited by

            Thanks for the reply Glenn. What I was trying to check (and I should circle it in red I think) was the desk top capability (thus support for plugins). I much prefer a desktop version as opposed to a web version. I have not created any dynamic components but agree with you there. I would also support real restrictions on commercial use (again the emphasis would be on β€œhobby” use).

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • ntxdaveN Offline
              ntxdave
              last edited by

              Here is an updated version of my Hobby License suggestion:

              Hobby License Suggestion.png

              I am trying to emphasize the following"

              • Desktop version
              • While you can use the iPad and Web versions, it is not required
              • Ability to use plugins
              • Ability to import models from the 3D Warehouse
              • NO commercial use and restrictions for violation

              Again, feedback would be appreciated. Especially any thoughts about submitting this suggestion to Trimvle on the SketchUp forum. πŸ˜„

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • HornOxxH Offline
                HornOxx
                last edited by

                @ntxdave said:

                Here is an updated version of my Hobby License suggestion...

                πŸ‘ πŸ‘ πŸ‘ πŸ‘ πŸ‘
                ... I have also been using SketchUp for as long as I can remember (v4 or v5, I'm not sure). And to this day I use SketchUp 2017 Make privately and yes, almost daily. In this private context, however, never commercially because instead we run SketchUp in commercial form in the company with at the moment about 24 pro-Licences.
                Your proposal Ntxdave is aimed at private, non-commercial use and, as far as I can see, roughly replicates the scope of 2017 Make, but in an up-to-date form, and I would love such a licensing model, even if it were accompanied by a reasonably low price as you suggested!

                πŸ˜„ πŸ˜‰

                I simply don't want to have to do without this tool, which has long since become something of an "old buddy", if I can name it that way...

                never trust a skinny cook

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • G Offline
                  Glenn at home
                  last edited by

                  @ntxdave said:

                  ...
                  [*]NO commercial use and restrictions for violation[/list]

                  ...

                  I can't think of any possible way to check and or enforce this. Other than some sort of watermark?

                  SketchUp Pro 2024/2025 Dell XPS 8950 i9-12900K 64GB Ram RTX 3080

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • ntxdaveN Offline
                    ntxdave
                    last edited by

                    Yes, it would be hard to enforce but it needs to be stated. Maybe someone can come up with an idea . Especially something other than a water mark (at least one that is visible).

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • G Offline
                      Glenn at home
                      last edited by

                      @ntxdave said:

                      ... Maybe someone can come up with an idea . Especially something other than a water mark (at least one that is visible).

                      Or just do like Form Z, BricsCAD and a few others and just not give a sh*t and have a free version that can be used for any purpose what so ever? πŸ˜‰
                      I do agree with a Hobby (Lite) license without Layout that allows plugins. Maybe one day πŸ˜„

                      SketchUp Pro 2024/2025 Dell XPS 8950 i9-12900K 64GB Ram RTX 3080

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • ntxdaveN Offline
                        ntxdave
                        last edited by

                        @glenn at home said:

                        @ntxdave said:

                        ... Maybe someone can come up with an idea . Especially something other than a water mark (at least one that is visible).

                        Or just do like Form Z, BricsCAD and a few others and just not give a sh*t and have a free version that can be used for any purpose what so ever? πŸ˜‰
                        I do agree with a Hobby (Lite) license without Layout that allows plugins. Maybe one day πŸ˜„

                        OK, I hope this is the last update but I looked at the list of features again and saw that I had some errors. So here is (I hope) my last update before I suggest this in the SketchUp forum.

                        Hobby License Suggestion.png

                        Again, any/all feedback and corrections would be greatly appreciated before I post in the SketchUp forum. πŸ˜„

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • ntxdaveN Offline
                          ntxdave
                          last edited by

                          OK - I just submitter my suggestion on the SketchUp forum. Here is a link to it. Suggestion - Hobby License

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • 1 / 1
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Buy SketchPlus
                          Buy SUbD
                          Buy WrapR
                          Buy eBook
                          Buy Modelur
                          Buy Vertex Tools
                          Buy SketchCuisine
                          Buy FormFonts

                          Advertisement