sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    ℹ️ Licensed Extensions | FredoBatch, ElevationProfile, FredoSketch, LayOps, MatSim and Pic2Shape will require license from Sept 1st More Info

    3D Truss Models

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Plugins
    1.5k Posts 31 Posters 869.7k Views 30 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • medeekM Offline
      medeek
      last edited by

      Version 3.2.1 - 01.04.2024

      • Updated and adjusted the logging function and auto-update functions.

      Nathaniel P. Wilkerson PE
      Medeek Engineering Inc
      design.medeek.com

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • medeekM Offline
        medeek
        last edited by

        Version 3.2.2 - 01.11.2023

        • Enabled layer control integration with the Medeek Project extension.
        • Moved the Medeek Tools module to the Medeek Project extension.

        Nathaniel P. Wilkerson PE
        Medeek Engineering Inc
        design.medeek.com

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • medeekM Offline
          medeek
          last edited by

          Version 3.2.3 - 02.06.2023

          • Fixed an infinite loop bug for (full) roof returns on truss roofs.
          • Updated the subtract feature to include roof return rafters and gutter downspouts for truss roofs.

          http://design.medeek.com/resources/trussplugin/images3/truss_su781_800.jpg

          Nathaniel P. Wilkerson PE
          Medeek Engineering Inc
          design.medeek.com

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • medeekM Offline
            medeek
            last edited by

            Version 3.2.4 - 02.09.2023

            • Enabled subtractive geometry for all complex rafter roofs.
            • Updated the subtract feature to include gutter downspouts for all rafter roofs.

            http://design.medeek.com/resources/trussplugin/images3/truss_su783_800.jpg

            http://design.medeek.com/resources/trussplugin/images3/truss_su782_800.jpg

            Nathaniel P. Wilkerson PE
            Medeek Engineering Inc
            design.medeek.com

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • medeekM Offline
              medeek
              last edited by

              !!!! BUG ALERT - SKETCHUP 2023 !!!!

              I've just identified an issue with the Truss plugin and the current release of SU 2023.

              Many of the tools within the Truss plugin still use the UI.inputbox module for simple menus, see example below:

              https://global.discourse-cdn.com/sketchup/original/3X/3/9/393af1c82a2d55897198b1e8fc54b38533ace41b.jpeg

              If you notice that this type of menu appears (not an HTML menu) then press alt-tab which will then require you to refocus on the menu with your mouse and will also allow it to function correctly.

              I don't know all of the details however it appears that the backend framework has extensively changed and in the process a few focus bugs have slipped through and need to be ironed out with SU 2023. See status and more details at the thread below:

              Link Preview Image
              SketchUp 2023 - changes to UI.inputbox focus?

              Question for the proper coders: A case of three ruby plugins; a plugin with a floating quad menu with my most-used commands - pressing items launches other plugins. a plugin that directly launches a UI.inputbox a plug…

              favicon

              SketchUp Community (forums.sketchup.com)

              For now I would recommend staying with SU 2022 if you extensively use SketchUp combined with the Truss and Foundation plugins. However the alt-tab work around should also keep you up and running if you have already migrated to SU 2023.

              I am hoping that minor update will be forthcoming in the near future from SketchUp, which will save me from having to rewrite a significant amount of code and pull me away from the Floor plugin development. If the bug is not fixed I will proceed to switch all remaining menus in the Truss and Foundation plugins to HTML dialog type menus, that process could take upwards of two to three weeks.

              Nathaniel P. Wilkerson PE
              Medeek Engineering Inc
              design.medeek.com

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • medeekM Offline
                medeek
                last edited by

                Version 3.2.5 - 06.17.2023

                • Enabled a gable wall cut for attic trusses.
                • Enabled a feature to selectively remove specific trusses from an attic truss assembly.

                http://design.medeek.com/resources/trussplugin/images3/truss_su784_800.jpg

                http://design.medeek.com/resources/trussplugin/images3/truss_su785_800.jpg

                After making the tutorial video for the inclined walls yesterday it quickly became apparent to me that the features for dealing with attic trusses and their implementation are wholly inadequate.

                The gable cut allows for one to then insert a hip wall into the opening created by the attic truss, which then further allows for windows and doors being inserted into the gable end of an attic truss.

                When dormers are added to an attic truss as shown it is usually necessary to remove certain trusses that conflict with these dormers and then ladder framing is added to bridge the gap created. The selective truss removal feature will now allow for the removal of any specific number of trusses in a attic truss assembly. However note that it does not automatically insert any of the ladder framing for the roof or floor of the attic.

                I will probably create a tutorial video explaining both of these features in more detail in the next couple of days.

                Nathaniel P. Wilkerson PE
                Medeek Engineering Inc
                design.medeek.com

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • gullfoG Offline
                  gullfo
                  last edited by

                  one consideration - a "half truss" for the section we're removing trusses - as the opposite roof section will still need a rafter at least, and potentially a cross-tie into the ridge beam on the doghouse?

                  Glenn

                  http://www.runnel.com

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • medeekM Offline
                    medeek
                    last edited by

                    Tutorial 21: Attic Trusses (14:26 min.)

                    A brief overview and demo of the Gable Wall Cut option and the selective truss removal feature.

                    Nathaniel P. Wilkerson PE
                    Medeek Engineering Inc
                    design.medeek.com

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • medeekM Offline
                      medeek
                      last edited by

                      Version 3.2.6 - 06.22.2023

                      • Enabled the "Edit Truss Assembly" function for all gambrel attic trusses.
                      • Enabled a gable wall cut for gambrel attic trusses.
                      • Enabled a feature to selectively remove specific trusses from gambrel attic truss assemblies.

                      http://design.medeek.com/resources/trussplugin/images3/truss_su787_800.jpg

                      http://design.medeek.com/resources/trussplugin/images3/truss_su788_800.jpg

                      There are still a number of advanced options that need to be completed for this truss type, namely soffit and fascia need to be added.

                      The ability to edit this truss type is a fairly significant upgrade.

                      Nathaniel P. Wilkerson PE
                      Medeek Engineering Inc
                      design.medeek.com

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • gullfoG Offline
                        gullfo
                        last edited by

                        more thoughts on this - if you divide the trusses into parts - parta = main remaining assembly after section removal, part b = the vert roof (in this example), and part c = "flat roof" (in this example). and flip the truss (if possible) so only part of it needs to be componentized.

                        then you would have the trusses partly available for roof sections which would not have openings. the rest of the opening geometry would have to be manually assembled as part of adding the doghouse, access door etc.


                        ideas for trusses0002.jpg


                        ideas for trusses0001.jpg

                        Glenn

                        http://www.runnel.com

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • medeekM Offline
                          medeek
                          last edited by

                          Version 3.2.7 - 06.26.2023

                          • Fixed a bug with the truss removal feature.
                          • Enabled a feature to selectively remove specific trusses from common and monopitch truss assemblies.

                          http://design.medeek.com/resources/trussplugin/images3/truss_su789_800.jpg

                          Nathaniel P. Wilkerson PE
                          Medeek Engineering Inc
                          design.medeek.com

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • medeekM Offline
                            medeek
                            last edited by

                            Version 3.2.7b - 06.28.2023

                            • Fixed a minor bug with the truss removal feature for all truss types.

                            *Note: This is a critical bug fix for common, monopitch, attic and gambrel attic trusses.

                            Nathaniel P. Wilkerson PE
                            Medeek Engineering Inc
                            design.medeek.com

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • medeekM Offline
                              medeek
                              last edited by

                              Version 3.2.8 - 07.05.2023

                              • Enabled a ridge centering option for asymmetric gable rafter roofs.
                              • Enabled a ridge centering option for asymmetric hip rafter roofs.

                              http://design.medeek.com/resources/trussplugin/images3/ridge_center.gif

                              http://design.medeek.com/resources/trussplugin/images3/truss_su794_800.jpg

                              I think the non-centered ridge is the more correct of the two, but if you do want the centered ridge then it is also an option.

                              Nathaniel P. Wilkerson PE
                              Medeek Engineering Inc
                              design.medeek.com

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • medeekM Offline
                                medeek
                                last edited by

                                Tutorial 22: Asymmetric Roof Framing (8:17 min.)

                                Centered vs. Non-centered ridges for asymmetric rafter roofs.

                                Nathaniel P. Wilkerson PE
                                Medeek Engineering Inc
                                design.medeek.com

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • medeekM Offline
                                  medeek
                                  last edited by

                                  Tutorial 23: Licensing and Upgrades (11:59 min.)

                                  Nathaniel P. Wilkerson PE
                                  Medeek Engineering Inc
                                  design.medeek.com

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • medeekM Offline
                                    medeek
                                    last edited by

                                    Tutorial 24: Complex Roof Discussion and Limitations (10:43 min.)

                                    Nathaniel P. Wilkerson PE
                                    Medeek Engineering Inc
                                    design.medeek.com

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • medeekM Offline
                                      medeek
                                      last edited by

                                      Version 3.2.9 - 08.28.2023
                                      Fixed a critical bug with the truss removal feature for truss sets.

                                      !!!! CRITICAL BUG FIX !!!!
                                      I highly recommend upgrading from versions 3.2.7 and 3.2.8.

                                      Nathaniel P. Wilkerson PE
                                      Medeek Engineering Inc
                                      design.medeek.com

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • medeekM Offline
                                        medeek
                                        last edited by

                                        Version 3.2.9b - 08.28.2023 thru 08.29.2023

                                        • Fixed a critical bug with the hip rafter roof module.

                                        Unfortunately I never noticed this error/bug because I usually test the plugin with the advanced options turned on automatically. If the advanced options are turned off and a hip roof is attempted and error will be thrown. This bug fix addresses that issue. I highly recommend upgrading to this latest version.

                                        Nathaniel P. Wilkerson PE
                                        Medeek Engineering Inc
                                        design.medeek.com

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • medeekM Offline
                                          medeek
                                          last edited by

                                          Version 3.2.9c - 08.30.2023

                                          • Fixed the non-orthogonal rafter framing bug for complex roofs.

                                          http://design.medeek.com/resources/trussplugin/images3/truss_su795_800.jpg

                                          I think I have finally resolved the confounded non-orthogonal rafter framing issue (it has been almost two years). It turns out the fix was simply replacing a complex piece of logic with two lines of code, sometimes simple is better.

                                          I highly recommend updating to this latest release. I apologize that it has taken this long to rectify the issue, I was made aware of it about 18 months ago but it has taken me a while to circle back and determine the cause and then the solution. Thank-you everyone for your patience.

                                          P.S.
                                          After testing non-orthogonal roofs this afternoon I realized that it would be handy to have the ability to custom offset the rafter spacing for each roof plane. Sometimes the algorithm is not smart enough to correctly position the rafter exactly where one might want them. I will give this some additional consideration.

                                          Nathaniel P. Wilkerson PE
                                          Medeek Engineering Inc
                                          design.medeek.com

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • gullfoG Offline
                                            gullfo
                                            last edited by

                                            or you'd run a "nailer" rafter between them for the rafters to attach too as expecting them to line up o.c. with differing roofs is low. if you were manually building it, you'd want a common nailer along that line to attach to while keep o.c. spacing. more complex roofs - each roof section is its own assembly if the single common nailer doesn't work.

                                            Glenn

                                            http://www.runnel.com

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 71
                                            • 72
                                            • 73
                                            • 74
                                            • 75
                                            • 75 / 75
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Buy SketchPlus
                                            Buy SUbD
                                            Buy WrapR
                                            Buy eBook
                                            Buy Modelur
                                            Buy Vertex Tools
                                            Buy SketchCuisine
                                            Buy FormFonts

                                            Advertisement