Can I have a Gripes & Bitchin' for Su 2014 thread?
-
@rv1974 said:
so miserable...
funny he should mention photoshop - the main reason I upgraded was when they added 64bit support. Made working with PS files like night and day from 32bit version. Just sayin'
-
It's only 2-3 years ago I got extremely excited, with some new features in PhotoShop...
I upgraded from CS3 to CS5 and I also got the 64bit version...
-
His comment is disturbing. The basic functionality of some digital work has stabilized because our use of it has not evolved. There is little development in Word because what we need from a word processor hasn't changed significantly in 30 years. We spend more time texting, posting on Facebook or Twitter than we do writing letters. This is why you can get Word (or some variant of it) in any new PC you buy because if Microsoft tried to charge you at the original price point you'd bail out to any of a number of free alternates. The same is true of 2D drafting. Autodesk is moving it's AutoCAD LT customers to the Inventor LT suite to entice them away from free or low cost alternatives like Draftsight from SolidWorks. 2D drafting is 2D drafting - it hasn't fundamentally changed in a generation. By adding a basic parametric modeler to AutoCAD LT, Autodesk makes a viable argument to it's customers to not jump ship.
But 3D work has changed and SketchUp's customers (and our customers in turn) expect more. Rhino V5 is a very different beast than Rhino V3. My first license for modo 401 was for a very capable sub d modeler - now the same program is a sophisticated UV editor, animator and renderer. The idea that there's no good reason to change or evolve - is silly.
His comments concern me because I worry that Trimble might see SketchUp as primarily a tool to be integrated into it's line of 3D scanning equipment, offering those customers a free software to export their scan data to.
-
@jim said:
That escalated quickly. You've written SU as dead in 4 posts.
Don't get me wrong, I love Sketchup. I'm quite pleased with the 2014 release.
But reading John Bacus is always painful... The fact that he's at the head of the dev team realy concerns me. -
@rv1974 said:
so miserable...
Is that real?!?! someone is a little out of touch with reality
maybe he should open again Photoshop 7 or CS, and Sketchup 4 or 5, and see which one evolved more in ~10 years...when we put this in this perspective it's just a really sad comparison for Sketchup
-
Hey, it could have been worse
AutoDesk kills off Softimage -
It is worse, I spoke to Trimble UK and they stated that Trimble no longer had an interest in Sketchup and a third party company would be taking over development. So if Trimble UK do not know what Trimble and Sketchup are doing, how are we expected to know????
-
I was just thinking what if AutoDesk had bought SU, would it be killed off already?Not to say Trimble won't still toss it overboard
(**Edit:
Granted - they've made a significant investment in furthering SU, so that, and its large userbase means SU isn't going anywhere soon.
) -
Gotta agree with Andy on this. Another lack luster upgrade is quite disappointing. We could have at least got a 3 point circle for the love of Pete. I just dont get it. The arc tools are not even useful? Was this some kind of joke?
-
Drape doesn't seem to be working with a model created in 2013. This is awesome.
-
Guys,
Whichever way to cut it SketchUp is '3D for Everyone' just as it says on the can!
I have come to realise this more and more as I read the comments made by folks signing up for SketchUcation membership. Every day we receive comments praising SketchUp for its ease of use and of course thanking SketchUcation for the support we all provide here.I can understand the aim to keep SketchUp simple to use. If it was to cater for all the complex needs of it's advanced users I think it would quickly become very bloated and loose its core attraction for folks that are totally new to 3D modeling or even CAD in general. SketchUp has brought folks into 3D modeling that would probably have never dreamt of giving 3D it a go. This is a great thing
Rather than talking about beefing up SketchUp maybe TSU should be thinking about totally new related products? Very few car manufactures have just a single model! Most have the basic low cost models that suit the needs of the majority and other most expensive models that meet the needs of the more demanding users.
Personally I would like to have a 2D 'front end' to SketchUp, preferably for a slate or iPad, that allows me to create those all important initial freehand doodles that can be developed into something that can easily be brought into SketchUp for massing etc. Also, it might be an idea to have the ability to move the content created in such a 'front end' (2D CAD-like) app to Layout for tidy up / combination with SketchUp models and final presentation output.
Just thoughts
Mike
-
Mike,
SU can be kept simple but still be able to handle enough polys to complete a scene. Everyone wants something different. I work in the arena that I believe SU was designed for, everyday buildings. I do need organic modeling but not as much as the next guy. So the boxy approach of SU is OK with me and the tools provided are generally enough. However I reached the slowdown associated with this program pretty quickly when I started to put scenes together.
Someone asked for transparency from software companies. I think John B. is being quite clear. SketchUp is not going to change much. LayOut seems to be getting new features regularly, but it's capabilities are now pretty well defined as well.
I would hate to see the TSU team branch out to other endeavors. Also I would not be interested in a 2d program that doesn't draw circles.
Peter
-
@rv1974 said:
so miserable...
I'd really like to hear his description of the last time WordStar added a really breathtaking feature, or the last time WordPerfect led the way with a new concept to revolutionize word processing.
Look what happened to Altavista when they stopped leading the way with new innovations.
It's not good enough to sit back and say "the rest of the pack is pretty slow right now, so we're just going to take a nap until they catch up." When they catch up, they will pass, and like Altavista or WordPerfect, you may never catch up again.
-
Seriously, Sandbox isnt working at all???
-
@valerostudio said:
Seriously, Sandbox isnt working at all???
Works here...what's it not doing for you?
-
@andybot said:
:? I was just thinking what if AutoDesk had bought SU, would it be killed off already?
Not to say Trimble won't still toss it overboard
I'd like to say "no" they wouldn't have. I mean look at FormIt. It is basically a SU like program for mobile devices and now on the web (pretty rough but still a beta). It's free and sure it is meant as tool for Revit users but no foul for wanting to further your own products. More work is needed but it looks to be at least progressing. I would like to think that SU would have either been enhanced or turned into a better tool.
The recent 123D tools are another nice tool set for users. Although I did not like the sudden shift that 123D Design made from a pro-sumer tool to it's more simplified form.
SU has been my go to app for some time (since v2) and I would hate to see it die but I do not like it's future -
@mike lucey said:
Rather than talking about beefing up SketchUp maybe TSU should be thinking about totally new related products? Very few car manufactures have just a single model! Most have the basic low cost models that suit the needs of the majority and other most expensive models that meet the needs of the more demanding users.
I don't think a need for new products is at the root of the disappointment around here. On the basis of the last two releases SU has stopped evolving (I have had a licensed copy since V4). I haven't looked at the wish list recently but I can imagine there are items on there that should be considered more usability / bug fixes than bloatware. My personal pet hate is the LO DWG export which is almost unusable at the receiving end. The SU Pro boolean tools were a major investment so why hasn't that evolved into solid section capability. The component hole cutting tool should have evolved to cut walls with thickness. None of these add any significant bloat they would just provide the basic tools many people would expect.
Unfortunately JB's attitude would suggest the subscription model is as many fear, an excuse to take money without having to demonstrate the benefits of upgrading. I guess we are unlikely to see even basic chamfer and fillet commands added anytime soon in SU and we will be left to rely upon the hero's of the plugin community to continue providing even the basics...
-
+10
-
@jiminy-billy-bob said:
He's pleased with the way SU is today, and just want it to stay that way - Except fixing bugs, expanding the API, adding minor things etc, nothing related to its core.
I'm all for fixing bugs, but that's what minor releases are for. Major releases should have major core improvements.
-
@arcad-uk said:
why hasn't that evolved into solid section capability. The component hole cutting tool should have evolved to cut walls with thickness. None of these add any significant bloat they would just provide the basic tools many people would expect.
Two good examples. Why when I cut a section I still see the "innards" --unless I use a plugin to "fix" it myself? The sort of things SU was designed to do. Make pictures of buildings and put windows in the walls. Pretty basic.
Advertisement