Let's have a Hardware speed test for SU
-
@wacov said:
Using a Q6600 at 2.4GhZ, 4GB DDR2 RAM, and a GTX 295:
Now, on SU7.1, using the same setup (At a higher resolution):
That's a massive difference!
The message? Get 7.1. NOW. -
[/quote]
Now, on SU7.1, using the same setup (At a higher resolution):
That's a massive difference!
The message? Get 7.1. NOW.[/quote]I got the message, wow!
Baz
-
Interesting test results:
XP sp3, duo 2.8, 4gb ram, 8500gt 512mbRan it with SU7.1, then saved it as SU6 and ran it with v6.4
Glenn
-
hmmmm...I can't upload multiple images?
ok, got it, sorry.
-
I got 21.1 fps with shadows off.
Computer specs are in my signature below
-Brodie
-
Glenn,
Now that's some impressive speed increase (of course, there areno textures in the model and such but still)
Brodie;
OK-ok... there are your computer specs but we don't know (just suspect maybe) what SU version you have! -
i didn't run this pre su7.1 but i'm willing to assume a huge difference since upgrading...
with an older quad mac..
with shadow ON:
shadows OFF:
-
Does SU run better on Macs? Or is it your RAM? Because... 150 fps... ? Wow...
-
Here's something odd.....I tried the test on 2 models, one the test model and the other one my roller coaster model. Here's the result.....quite suprising:
The picture below shows my computer stats......
It's a laptop by the way -
How about the video card and OpenGL hardware support ("acceleration" in Preferences > OpenGL)?
-
I got new Notebook so here's the results
-
@wacov said:
:shock:
Does SU run better on Macs? Or is it your RAM? Because... 150 fps... ? Wow...
i'm not sure because i've never used windows for comparison.. there was an export test around here a while ago in which the macs were able to export jpgs at more than twice the size as windows but other than that, i haven't seen anything alluding to SU being better with OS X..
in fact, there are often things i see that work on PCs that i can't do. -
MY CONFIG : macbook pro - mid 2009 unibody 15" 4GbRam 512Mo 9600MGT HD500gb 5400rpm - snow leopard 10.6.1
I ve run the cube test with each graphic configuration on the same machine running sketchup pro 7.0, and results are quite surprising :9400M : 5.336s - 27.4665s (shadows on) -- with SU7.1= 1.228 - 1.229(shadows on)
9600M GT : 5.327s - 27,669s (shadows on) --with SU7.1= 1.324 - 1.225(shadows on)I've run the same test with my architecture diploma file (40000m2 hotel+parking+many cars+trees and textures = 4mb files)
9400M : 6.572s - 99.579s (shadows on) --with SU7.1= 4.774 - 5.074(shadows on)
9600M GT : 6.601s - 101.156s (shadows on) --with SU7.1= 5.034 -5.225(shadows on)That confirms my impression, I can't notice any difference between running sketchup with 9400 and with 9600.
What do u think about that ? Could some mac users confirm these results ?And 7.1pro version is really impressive.
related link (hardware recommendation) :
http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=10750&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&start=285 -
Here are results form Macbook Pro 13"
Strangely, I was getting 15-16 fps then I turned on shadows and it increased??
-
My results, first test with no shadows
This one with shadows on
- core i7-860, 2.8GHz
- 8 GB memory
- Nvidia QuadroFX 1800 graphics card with 768 Mb memory
- 1080 x 1920 screen, SU maximized
- Windows 7 Pro 64-bit
-
sweet...
and the GPU is an NVidia Quadro FX 770M... is that any good?
oh and with shadows off, the time was 1.141. Average frame=0.016 sec., 63.1 fr/s
-
Ok. Not sure how to do screen shots but I will just give you the info.
Without shadows.
72 frames displayed in 3.420 seconds
average frame = 0.047 seconds
21.1 frames/secondWith shadows.
72 frames displayed in 1.373 seconds
average frame = 0.019 seconds
52.5 frames/secondAMD phenom II x4 black edition 3.0ghz
8 gigs DDR2
ATI HD4850 1024
1920x1080
win 7 64 home prem -
-
Here's the results using my new laptop
ultimatez
-
Toshiba A300 Satellite, 2 years old dual core intel, 3 gig ram, 32 bit windows 7, ATI mobility card
Advertisement