sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    ℹ️ Licensed Extensions | FredoBatch, ElevationProfile, FredoSketch, LayOps, MatSim and Pic2Shape will require license from Sept 1st More Info

    Need help makeing screw edge

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved SketchUp Discussions
    sketchup
    26 Posts 9 Posters 3.4k Views 9 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Z Offline
      ziggy7
      last edited by

      @unknownuser said:

      always remember. . .Lefty-Loosie! Righty-Tighty! 🤣

      That is just a general rule of thumb, there are many items and bolts out there (especially in the automotive world) that are the opposite due to a rotation of a part and not wanting it to un-thread during operation.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • david_hD Offline
        david_h
        last edited by

        yes. . .this is true. I just like saying lefty-looie.

        If I make it look easy...It is probably easy

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • takesh hT Offline
          takesh h
          last edited by

          What's happening here is very logical.
          You are using a Ruby that keeps a section profile always "upright standing".
          Imagine what the profile could do when the path is also vertical...
          And look carefully Blah 11, you are not getting your threads right at any points of the spiral except at the bottom (as in the 3rd image).
          The solution for the problem is, I assume, to make the reference path stand up and then re-apply the ruby.
          Hope the images will explain it better.


          Spiral.jpg


          FaK1.jpg


          FaK2.jpg

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • R Offline
            remus
            last edited by

            Well spotted takesh 👍

            http://remusrendering.wordpress.com/

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • jeff hammondJ Offline
              jeff hammond
              last edited by

              @takesh h said:

              What's happening here is very logical.
              You are using a Ruby that keeps a section profile always "upright standing".
              Imagine what the profile could do when the path is also vertical...
              And look carefully Blah 11, you are not getting your threads right at any points of the spiral except at the bottom (as in the 3rd image).
              The solution for the problem is, I assume, to make the reference path stand up and then re-apply the ruby.
              Hope the images will explain it better.

              i'm not really following this.. what do you mean by 'you are not getting your threads right at any points of the spiral except at the bottom' ?
              is that in reference to the original post or the state of the thread when you made your post? as far as i can figure, the threads are correct at all points of the spiral (i'm talking about the .skp in the 8th post of the thread).. are you saying something is wrong with that that i'm not noticing?

              dotdotdot

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • GaieusG Offline
                Gaieus
                last edited by

                It's about "Follow me and keep" plugin, Jeff. As it works,it will always keep the profile straight along the Z axis so you have the correct results (in this case) if you follow a spiral wound up along the Z axis.

                Gai...

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • takesh hT Offline
                  takesh h
                  last edited by

                  @unknownuser said:

                  i'm not really following this.. what do you mean by 'you are not getting your threads right at any points of the spiral except at the bottom' ?

                  Oh this is a solved problem... sorry I didn't see the solution has been posted. Missed your model in post #8.
                  I saw the image in post #11 and thought it's an ongoing problem.
                  I was refering to blah11's quoted image in post #11.

                  While I was looking at Jeff's model, an odd thought came down to me.
                  This whole thing can be done without using Ruby - I'll explain.
                  BTW you can do it as elements horizontally lying down (as in the image in post#11) with this method.


                  A spiral with a single turn will do the job. This can be created by rotating a top face of a cylinder and multipy it vertically.


                  Copy the spiral to match dimensions of the thread needed. Draw a cylinder with the same number of edges as the spirals and create faces between them. Erase unneeded faces.  Select faces that's to be the top of teeth, resize them gripping edge midpoint, in one dimension (width only), from center.


                  Voila


                  Now multiply the created geometry verticaly as many times as you need.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • B Offline
                    Blah11
                    last edited by

                    OK its not the best but I am proud of my accomplishment heres a preview of the screw edge

                    http://i228.photobucket.com/albums/ee18/Troopermanaic/1111.jpg

                    I knew it would be valuable for me to come to this forum. Now is there a plugin that can turn things inside out? I would much rather do that instead of making the other edge which is a pain.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • takesh hT Offline
                      takesh h
                      last edited by

                      @blah11 said:

                      Now is there a plugin that can turn things inside out? I would much rather do that instead of making the other edge which is a pain.

                      Look what you got there Blah, it's already reversed!
                      I mean, it's a matter of which way you extend these thread surfaces as a volume, introverted or extroverted.
                      Or am I missing something?
                      Just group them and make a copy in the place.
                      Keep modeling one of them as an internal volume, and the other as an external volume.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • B Offline
                        Blah11
                        last edited by

                        I wasn't thinking when I modeled it I hollowed the inside, I guess it doesn't matter I found a different way to do the 2nd part anyway thanks,

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • gillesG Offline
                          gilles
                          last edited by

                          http://www.crai.archi.fr/rubylibrarydepot/ruby/screw1_5.rb
                          try this.

                          " c'est curieux chez les marins ce besoin de faire des phrases "

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • 1
                          • 2
                          • 1 / 2
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Buy SketchPlus
                          Buy SUbD
                          Buy WrapR
                          Buy eBook
                          Buy Modelur
                          Buy Vertex Tools
                          Buy SketchCuisine
                          Buy FormFonts

                          Advertisement