3D object from 2D pic

chrisdell

Hello all,

This is my first post here. I've been messing around with SU for years but just recently I've been taking it more seriously.

I'm trying to figure out how to extrude a 3D object from a 2D picture [See attached] with the least amount of effort. This is to say, I'm sure I could outline each and every piece, but that would be a big pain.

Can anyone suggest to me how to best do this or what tool(s) are best for doing this?

Is there anything out there (Ruby script?) that will select just the red portion or make an outline of the red part?

Mucho thanks

C

Chris Fullmer

Yup, like Frenchy says, the normal process would be to "vectorize" it. That just means turning the image into a series of shapes that can be imported directly into SketchUp. I personally use illustraor for that task because I have it handy. But inkscape is a great free alternative. If you have illustrator, I could help you figure ouyt that process if you'd like.

Chris

chrisdell

Thanks for the feedback.

I've turned it into a .psd (actually I turned it into other vector files too). Now what? I've tried to import it into a drawing and it still acts like it's just a .jpg. It maps onto a surface and I can't select the red elements by themselves.

I figure I'm importing incorrectly but can't figure out another way. Can someone tell me the right way to be handling this or point me in the direction of a tutorial?

thanks

C

Gaieus

Chris,

You should be able to export it first as dwg from your 3rd party app. THEN import it into SU as dwg.

pilou

Seems you must use first something like that Vector Magic (not free)
Then found a converter

Inskape is free!
You can vectorize with it!

chrisdell

Export a .psd as a .dwg?! I have no idea how to do that or what kind of software I would need to do that. I was able to export it as a .dxf but SU crashed every time I tried to import it.

Chris Fullmer

I'm thinking that perhaps it is not actually turned into a vector image. You could upload the original. And the dxf and the psd. It would be interesting to see those. Then we can point you to the next step.

Do you have illustrator? Photoshop won't do the process that I use.

Chris

linea

Chris

I've vectorised it for you

You'll still have to clean it up a little. The process was;

Open in Inkscape. Select Path on the menu bar> Trace bitmap> Save as png. This traces it. You can save as dxf in Inkscape but in this instance, it is not useful because Inkscape has no way of thinning the line thicknesses down enough for dxf format to read them as lines suitable for cad. So save as png.

2)Open png in Wintopo Vectoriser > Open png > Select Vectorisation on menu bar> select One touch vectorisation.Now you have thin lines suitable for dxf. Select Save on menu bar> save vector> as dxf.

3)Import dxf into SU

Not bad for 3 free programs

WinTopo - Raster to Vector conversion Software

WinTopo raster to vector conversion software

(www.wintopo.com)

AIA.skp

pilou

Same process than linea but in Inkscape make this before export PNG! Fill outline
So result in right is a little better
Curves must be always welded , create face, in SU before some push pull!

linea

Sorry Pilou, I didn't know you could do that.

pilou

No problem and I am quasi sure that exist a trick for make directly only curves parth for export it in DXF

bubbalove

Couldn't you just import the picture and trace it? Then you wouldn't have to worry about turning it into a different format, import into to sketchup, then go and edit it to make it work... I'm just curious...

Chris Fullmer

You could, but that gets tedious and its hard to make it super exact sometimes. And if there is lots of stuff to trace, it could take hours. So automating the process is nice to be able to do.

Chris

chrisdell

Pilou, linea, Chris,

Wow! thanks for all the input. I can't thank you guys enough.

This is where I'm at:

After my last post I saved to from Inkscape to a dxf file and opened it up in Illustrator. After some time I got the line work to be more uniformed. (FYI, I totally suck at Illustrator and don't really know what all it can do or what even makes it different from PS)

I saved it from Illustrator as a .dwg file and was then able to import the line work into SU.

I then drew a face under the entire drawing, and 'intersected' the face and line work and came up with extrude-able objects. (see attached)

One thing I'm concerned about is the the amount of line segments. I'm thinking that I should probably find a better quality image to begin with.

Another thing I concerned about is that I can't seem to join the line segments. They're all individual pieces and I'm wondering if that increases the size of the drawing? I know this is just a small little logo and probably doesn't make much of a difference here, but could this be a larger issue if you do this same process with a larger (or multiple) images? (see attached)

Lastly, Thanks for the Wintopo suggestion linea, unfortunately in this case, "I'm a Mac". Is there Mactopo?

aia01.tiff

aia02.tiff

linea

You can reduce the number of line segments by using the weld plugin (free)
http://www.cad-addict.com/2008/08/sketchup-plugins-weld.html

@unknownuser said:

Lastly, Thanks for the Wintopo suggestion linea, unfortunately in this case, "I'm a Mac". Is there Mactopo?

If there is Mike Lucey is the man who will most likely know. Mike!
Or you could try Silhouette http://www.rocketdownload.com/program/silhouette-plugin-2182.html

bubbalove

I've traced many images to create logos for businesses as most of them aren't that detailed. I now know that if I have to do a detailed picture that I can use the other method which I didn't know about before I saw this thread... thanks to all who contributed...

Chris Fullmer

@unknownuser said:

I would trace half the image without the birds head. Then mirror or flip a copy so you are only tracing half. Then do the Bird head.

If you were going to trace it, I think James has a key point. If an image has a large portion that is mirrored, make sure that you only trace one half and then mirror your work to the other side. That way if there are any imperfections in your tracing, at least they will be perfectly symmetrical on each side this way. You can hide a lot of flaws that way.

Chris