sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • 登入
    ℹ️ Licensed Extensions | FredoBatch, ElevationProfile, FredoSketch, LayOps, MatSim and Pic2Shape will require license from Sept 1st More Info

    Construction & Working Drawings - Discussion

    已排程 已置頂 已鎖定 已移動 LayOut Discussions
    layout
    453 貼文 114 Posters 375.2k 瀏覽 114 Watching
    正在載入更多貼文
    • 從舊到新
    • 從新到舊
    • 最多點贊
    回覆
    • 在新貼文中回覆
    登入後回覆
    此主題已被刪除。只有擁有主題管理權限的使用者可以查看。
    • bmikeB 離線
      bmike
      最後由 編輯

      A new project... getting a bit faster. Still wishing for some more intuitive tools, and still wishing LayOut wasn't so damned slow...

      http://lh4.ggpht.com/_0jkA5M3PGcY/TAgS7KlD9-I/AAAAAAAAPRI/aRoaJXwk38o/s800/vww-6-2-10-presentation_03.jpg

      http://lh5.ggpht.com/_0jkA5M3PGcY/TAgS7rQSApI/AAAAAAAAPRQ/2Uo0UkpFWnk/s800/vww-6-2-10-presentation_06.jpg

      http://lh6.ggpht.com/_0jkA5M3PGcY/TAgS8cdgydI/AAAAAAAAPRc/ifG2BVYt0hk/s800/vww-6-2-10-presentation_11.jpg

      http://lh5.ggpht.com/_0jkA5M3PGcY/TAgS8rNOEfI/AAAAAAAAPRg/MLtHgfNq2Hw/s800/vww-6-2-10-presentation_14.jpg

      mike beganyi design + consulting llc

      1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
      • SektaS 離線
        Sekta
        最後由 編輯

        bmike,

        I am really liking these drawings. The 3D bolted connection details are great 👍 👍

        1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
        • bmikeB 離線
          bmike
          最後由 編輯

          @unknownuser said:

          bmike,

          I am really liking these drawings. The 3D bolted connection details are great 👍 👍

          thanks...!

          mike beganyi design + consulting llc

          1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
          • D 離線
            dieubermensch
            最後由 編輯

            @dale said:

            Another example of this is Atelier Bow Wow.

            hoooooly cinnamon buns!!!! this looks awesome, i'm already trying to forget about autocad and this is how i want my drawings to look like

            1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
            • H 離線
              hubiedoo517
              最後由 編輯

              Wow that's nice, I like that the bolts are textured and colored so the details are idiot proof. These days you need to make everything as clear as possible because assuming people know what they are doing can be a big and costly mistake. A person experienced in layout can really make a job go much more smoothly and save money too. Those drawings with the bolt details is a perfect example. Thanks for posting it.

              1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
              • Riceles CostaR 離線
                Riceles Costa
                最後由 編輯

                Hello for all. I,m architect using SU 6 with LO. I'm using SU for the last 11 months, first to develop 3D model to customers. All CD was done in CAD. By now, after seeing LO gallery and earlier posts I decided to include LO to CD. I did prepare many scenes with floor plan, elevations and sections, but when I put scenes in the LO viewports the sections planes are still highlighted. Anyone could help how to fix it?

                Thanks in advance.

                Riceles Costa

                1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                • Riceles CostaR 離線
                  Riceles Costa
                  最後由 編輯

                  Hello. After posting my question I returned to the SU and fix the problem. It is enough use "hide" in each section plane, save the file and update LO file. Very easy.

                  When my drawings are finished I will post here.

                  Riceles

                  1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                  • K 離線
                    Klog
                    最後由 編輯

                    Hello to all in this thread

                    I have just uploaded to Google Warehouse my set of Electrical symbols and structural symbols including the Elusive DASHED LINE! To use the electrical symbols just open each component and hide the version you do not want. For the dashed line and arc just scale them to the drawing, edit component and get rid of the very stretched circle. For those who want to fine tune the process of creating dashed lines and get them to the right look for their projects here is the info: painful as it is, for a straight line you must draw a set of equal lines with equal spaces between (or any regular variation, I think mine were 1/4" each) and - here is the key - add a small circle to one end. Then make a component of it and it is scalable. 😍 For the arc I just drew an arc, exploded it, made a component of it, and hid every other segment in edit mode. It too is scalable.

                    After digesting every word in this forum topic it is time to give back to you all. At least I hope this is an original idea or I will feel real stupid 😳 the URL: http://sketchup.google.com/3dwarehouse/cldetails?mid=ead79f519f67b4c28fb37abf337da9ec&ct=mdcc&prevstart=0

                    Thank you all for the great info.
                    Klog

                    Klog http://www.tetontimberframe.com

                    Win 7 Pro Dell Precision M4500 4Gig 4 threads @ 2.9 GB/S
                    Skp 7 Pro & 8

                    1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                    • GaieusG 離線
                      Gaieus
                      最後由 編輯

                      Hi Klog,

                      Thanks for those! I am not in this trade but I understand it will be extremely useful for some people!
                      👍

                      Gai...

                      1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                      • R 離線
                        rockersujith
                        最後由 編輯

                        I am very much impressed with the capabilities of SU... but I find CAD applications more easy and the results are more perfect the 3D view is also more accurate without containing any mistakes and it is trustworthy. I have been using CAD applications for about more than 2 years and I'm loving it 😄 but there can be some more things that can be done by integrating both CAD applications and SU, like the use of DataCAD 12, import the SU features and then have DataCAD generate 2D elevation drawings. It can take a few minutes, but still quicker than recreating them from scratch, and cleaner than importing a dwg file from SU. So it can be more useful that just using a single software

                        1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                        • bmikeB 離線
                          bmike
                          最後由 編輯

                          Another recent project:

                          http://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-D9x0ftpjYAg/Te4_Vu7ttrI/AAAAAAAAQXk/MkU07GprXLU/s800/poland5-25-11-metric_Page_01.jpg

                          http://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-IwkDyMGfFCA/Te4_ZtjyhwI/AAAAAAAAQYc/Qugq9mz1Ex4/s800/poland5-25-11-metric_Page_15.jpg

                          http://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-Em91oj0INbM/Te4_a1-p-MI/AAAAAAAAQYs/hwBHxIEceec/s800/poland5-25-11-metric_Page_19.jpg

                          http://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-rmaPto38v3M/Te4_m0LDLwI/AAAAAAAAQZc/I7TCTIRTOoM/s800/poland-6-7-11-LIFT_Page_4.jpg

                          http://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-EORC_cca95s/Te4_nEpCp9I/AAAAAAAAQZg/H9PhE6rxCo8/s800/poland-6-7-11-LIFT_Page_5.jpg

                          mike beganyi design + consulting llc

                          1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                          • mariochaM 離線
                            mariocha
                            最後由 編輯

                            @rockersujith said:

                            I am very much impressed with the capabilities of SU... but I find CAD applications more easy and the results are more perfect the 3D view is also more accurate without containing any mistakes and it is trustworthy. I have been using CAD applications for about more than 2 years and I'm loving it 😄 but there can be some more things that can be done by integrating both CAD applications and SU, like the use of DataCAD 12, import the SU features and then have DataCAD generate 2D elevation drawings. It can take a few minutes, but still quicker than recreating them from scratch, and cleaner than importing a dwg file from SU. So it can be more useful that just using a single software

                            I completly disagree. Accuracy is not a problem in SU, architecture wise.
                            The simpliest and fastest way to do elevation (or any drawing) is SU+Layout.
                            So, in a way, you are right in saying not to use just a single soft. 😄

                            %(#008000)[Mario C.
                            Every rule has exceptions, but some.]

                            1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                            • Dave RD 離線
                              Dave R
                              最後由 編輯

                              @rockersujith said:

                              ... but I find CAD applications more easy and the results are more perfect the 3D view is also more accurate without containing any mistakes and it is trustworthy.

                              I don't agree with your assertion that SketchUp is inaccurate or creates mistakes. SketchUp is definitely capable of very high accuracy and precision. Mistakes or lack of accuracy are induced by the user.

                              Etaoin Shrdlu

                              %

                              (THERE'S NO PLACE LIKE)

                              G28 X0.0 Y0.0 Z0.0

                              M30

                              %

                              1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                              • bmikeB 離線
                                bmike
                                最後由 編輯

                                @dave r said:

                                @rockersujith said:

                                ... but I find CAD applications more easy and the results are more perfect the 3D view is also more accurate without containing any mistakes and it is trustworthy.

                                I don't agree with your assertion that SketchUp is inaccurate or creates mistakes. SketchUp is definitely capable of very high accuracy and precision. Mistakes or lack of accuracy are induced by the user.

                                agreed. sketchup is as accurate as the user makes it.

                                mike beganyi design + consulting llc

                                1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                                • K 離線
                                  kaas
                                  最後由 編輯

                                  Hello,

                                  I'm trying out the combination of SU and LO as an alternative to CAD. I added a picture from a test.

                                  The picture at the top is a perspective view from SU, rendered in LO as vector. I added the dimensions in SU because there I'm sure which points I'm measuring. In LO the dimensions are sometimes off.
                                  Question: can the leaders of the dimensions in SU somehow be hidden? I prefer just the slash.

                                  The second picture is a section cutface with the hatches from SU, rendered in LO as raster.
                                  Question: Is there a way to improve the quality / crispness of the hatches? I use high res images as textures and my output quality is set to high.

                                  The third image is the section cutface without textures rendered in LO as vector.

                                  The last image is a combination of all of the above in LO.

                                  I'm not unhappy with the final image in LO but I would like to improve some elements. I hope someone has an answer to the questions.

                                  Greetings,

                                  Max

                                  edit: added the pdf


                                  pdf

                                  1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                                  • K 離線
                                    Klog
                                    最後由 編輯

                                    Kaas
                                    "Question: can the leaders of the dimensions in SU somehow be hidden? I prefer just the slash.

                                    The second picture is a section cutface with the hatches from SU, rendered in LO as raster.
                                    Question: Is there a way to improve the quality / crispness of the hatches? I use high res images as textures and my output quality is set to high."
                                    As far as I know the leaders for dimension lines cannot be altered - LO or SKUP. Second, I created some clear hatches from AutoCad by hatching a box in AC and making a jpg of it. Choose the lineweight in AC. Save the jpg where you would put .skm files, crop for tiling, and create a new material in SKUP using that jpg.
                                    The "hatches" (read materials) in SKUP are subject to inherent styles apparently (someone correct me if wrong)and often include some screening effects.
                                    I prefer the dimensioning to be done in SKUP for the same reasons you do. I will attempt to attach the concrete hatch made in this fashion.
                                    Hope this helps some.
                                    Klog


                                    Desat concrete.skm

                                    Klog http://www.tetontimberframe.com

                                    Win 7 Pro Dell Precision M4500 4Gig 4 threads @ 2.9 GB/S
                                    Skp 7 Pro & 8

                                    1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                                    • K 離線
                                      kaas
                                      最後由 編輯

                                      Hello Klog,

                                      @unknownuser said:

                                      As far as I know the leaders for dimension lines cannot be altered - LO or SKUP.

                                      In LO they can be altered. Just double click on a dimension and you get some extra grips to alter the leaders.

                                      @unknownuser said:

                                      Second, I created some clear hatches from AutoCad by hatching a box in AC and making a jpg of it....The "hatches" (read materials) in SKUP are subject to inherent styles apparently (someone correct me if wrong)and often include some screening effects.

                                      It's a nice material you created but I think the base resolution of the texture in SU isn't the problem (I use 256x128 or 512x256 for a simple hatch like the attachment). I still would like to improve the sharpness in LO for those SU-hatches.

                                      Greetings, Max


                                      arc_iso.png

                                      1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                                      • K 離線
                                        Klog
                                        最後由 編輯

                                        Max
                                        If you are using the stock hatches that come with Skup then you probably cannot change the sharpness. When you make your own you bypass that problem unless the style you are using for the scene incorporates some fade-out (fog). Thanks for the info on dimension leaders ...
                                        Al (Klog)

                                        Klog http://www.tetontimberframe.com

                                        Win 7 Pro Dell Precision M4500 4Gig 4 threads @ 2.9 GB/S
                                        Skp 7 Pro & 8

                                        1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                                        • bmikeB 離線
                                          bmike
                                          最後由 編輯

                                          Another recent project, more pics and info on my blog:

                                          http://mikebeganyi.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/bridge-6-30-11_Page_12.jpg

                                          http://mikebeganyi.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/bridge-6-30-11_Page_01.jpg

                                          mike beganyi design + consulting llc

                                          1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                                          • bmikeB 離線
                                            bmike
                                            最後由 編輯

                                            http://mikebeganyi.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/bridge-6-30-11_Page_09.jpg

                                            mike beganyi design + consulting llc

                                            1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 8
                                            • 9
                                            • 10
                                            • 11
                                            • 12
                                            • 22
                                            • 23
                                            • 10 / 23
                                            • 第一個貼文
                                              最後的貼文
                                            Buy SketchPlus
                                            Buy SUbD
                                            Buy WrapR
                                            Buy eBook
                                            Buy Modelur
                                            Buy Vertex Tools
                                            Buy SketchCuisine
                                            Buy FormFonts

                                            Advertisement