Do humans have a free will?
-
Alan,
God, using different writers, inspired them (even dictated them) His Word to have a precise and complete communication with us – The Scriptures).
It wasn’t a coincidence that the Pope, like Athanasius of Alexandria and others decided the same components (books) of the Bible – God inspired them, also!Mike,
It’s difficult to understand the Bible language, because many terms ar loaded with additional significance. You must read the entire Book, at least one time!
If not, you will be in a ‘dangerous’ position like David_H: hard to comprehend or solve “why is Philemon part of the Bible?”.*“Oy Vey!”,*David_H,
I read inclusive that ‘pretense Bible’: “the Book Of Mormon”…Cornel
-
Whether we truly have free will or not is probably less important than if we perceive that we do.
It's a little like the nature of matter. That desk in front of you is actually made up of particles so insubstantial compared to the emptiness surrounding them that there is practically nothing there. Yet you have no choice but to interact with it as if it was a solid object. Similarly, there has to be a concept of free will, because without it we have no concept of good and bad choices, no virtue, no evil, no crime....just predetermined response.
-
@alan fraser said:
Whether we truly have free will or not is probably less important than if we perceive that we do.
It's a little like the nature of matter. That desk in front of you is actually made up of particles so insubstantial compared to the emptiness surrounding them that there is practically nothing there. Yet you have no choice but to interact with it as if it was a solid object. Similarly, there has to be a concept of free will, because without it we have no concept of good and bad choices, no virtue, no evil, no crime....just predetermined response.
Without freewill actions will still have inderminant out come. At least thats what Chaos theory whould tell us.
-
@chango70 said:
So NO we don't have 'free will' in a absolute sence, but we do have it in a limited sense.
nicely said, chango.
that means, we asume to have a free will as long as we are not able to look behind our own decisions. but we don't need to be afraid, because we will never be able to do that. our mind is just not able to go beyond it's own limits.so, as you said, the definition of a 'free will' is relative. so I think it is save to say:
In a human scale, we have a free will
-
“…our own decisions…”?!
“But now, O LORD, you are our Father; we are the clay, and you are our potter; we are all the work of your hand.”
(Isaiah 64:8)
"[i]human scale" [/i]!!?
“O LORD, what is man that you regard him, or the son of man that you think of him?”
(Psalms 144:3)The enigma of ‘free willing’ is deeper than present discussions!
Voila a more realistic starting point:
“For the creation was subjected to futility, not willingly, but because of him who subjected it, in hope that the creation itself will be set free from its bondage to corruption and obtain the freedom of the glory of the children of God.” (Romans 8:20-21)Cornel
-
Solo wrote:,
“I doubt Cornel believes in evolution.”I believe in devolution.
Jackson,
No one will “go to hell for eternity” for sins, because Jesus Christ paid for them!
Since you are confused about the “way of salvation”, you cannot comprehend the status of babies.Cornel
-
Slightly OT again. Regarding the question of infant mortality, this makes interesting reading.
http://politicsplusstuff.blogspot.com/2005/12/roman-catholic-church-reconsiders.htmlThe RC church only recently "informally" changed its mind about the destination of unbaptised infants. Previously, they did indeed go to Purgatory. So now it's all right...it's official...they only go to Limbo. The problem is that organised religion is doing this all the time....with or without God's permission. Taking a fixed position on this issue, like anything else, makes as much sense as taking an eternal, unmoving position on fashion.
-
Amazing how the bible can be twisted to support your convenience. I bet Cornel can even find a passage that have nothing to do with squat that will even support the Iraq war.
-
@solo said:
Amazing how the bible can be twisted to support your convenience. I bet Cornel can even find a passage that have nothing to do with squat that will even support the Iraq war.
I am pretty sure that's happened already
. It's pretty scary. -
@unknownuser said:
CraigD,
re. your "Humans DO have free will!!"There are a few conditions…
See an example!:
”…and you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free[.” (John 8:32)Cornel
You are obviously not married...
HAHAHA -
Solo & Chongo...,
If you already read the Book of Daniel, you don’t have to wait for me …!
(re. Iraq)Cornel
P.S.:
Versions of Proverbs 19:13, for CraigD:
“…a quarrelsome wife is as annoying as constant dripping.”
“…a wife’s quarreling is a continual dripping of rain.”
“…the contentions of a wife are a constant dripping.” -
Great thread! I'm a bit late to it so forgive me. chongo70 I'm really digging your comments, great approach.
I'd like to add that from my atheist perspective the idea of free will is a purely religious construct, meaning that it can only be discussed within the framework of some religion. Without that it's quite absurd because it requires me to imagine someone in my head other than me. My actions are determined by the way my thoughts developed as I aged and how they were formed by my parents, peers, and environment. There is no entity (God) upon which to pin that developmental influence. That being said, is it fair to say that atheists have free will and religious people do not on the basis that their actions are either preprogrammed by or at least influenced by the word (will) of their God?
-
@unknownuser said:
Solo & Chongo...,
If you already read the Book of Daniel, you don’t have to wait for me …!
(re. Iraq)Cornel
P.S.:
Versions of Proverbs 19:13, for CraigD:
“…a quarrelsome wife is as annoying as constant dripping.”
“…a wife’s quarreling is a continual dripping of rain.”
“…the contentions of a wife are a constant dripping.”Cornel
Can you quote the entire Old & New Testament back to back? Am I supposed to be impressed by that?
-
Eric you hit the nail on the head, Like you, I too am athiest and liberated from a scripted existence that most 'practicing' religious folk are restricted to.
I make choices based on my values and morals and I accept the consequences of those decisions, this gives me the conclusion that I have free will. Unlike Cornel for instance, who really does not have free will as he is trapped to the regiment of his convictions, all decisions need to be qualified by his book of quotes and parables, and second guessing based on an eternity of harps and hymns or sulfur and brimstone. -
Eric & Pete,
(Am I ‘crazy’…?!)If you are atheists, you cannot explain entire “spirit” and part of the “soul”
but you are ‘proud’ about your freedom...?!!Paradoxically…:
CornelP.S.:
"The natural person () does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned*." (1 Corinthians 2:14)
(* - like an atheist...) -
@unknownuser said:
P.S.:
"The natural person () does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned*." (1 Corinthians 2:14)
(* - like an atheist...)Thanks Cornel, I coundn't have said it better myself. Funny thing about this quote is that religious people read it and feel sorry for atheists and atheists don't read it. Does 'Natural' maan 'atheist'? Does this mean spiritual/religious people are un-natural?
-
Excellently put Tomasz, You have said a lot in a few shorts sentences.
Mike
-
Hi, thanks Plot for bringing in a new interesting thread. I intend to go back to the old one as well.
I am sure we have free will. Without it we couldn't take responsibility for our actions.
If we won't exercise this gift, we will be like an anonymous, colourless mass.As already pointed out, very often we are being pushed to do something, very often our emotions win and we do what in fairness we don't want to.
There are people who doesn't care and do what they were told to without a trace of reflection.
On the other hand, there are people with very well formed minds (souls), being able to exercise their gift.Tomasz
-
Cornel wrote:
@unknownuser said:
If you are atheists, you cannot explain entire “spirit” and part of the “soul”
but you are ‘proud’ about your freedom...?!!Um, Cornel focus for a second, you the one that insists on mentioning souls and spirits, let me try again .... I am athiest and I have spirits in a pub and soles on my shoes. I do not believe in ghosts holy or not, heaven nor hell. I do believe jesus existed, but not as the son of God born to a virgin but rather a very socially liberal dude with a magnetic personallity and a posse.
-
Eric,
per your request,Voila versions of expression “the natural man”,
from different English translations of The Bible:“nonspiritual man”,
“people who aren’t spiritual”,
“the sensual man”,
“a beastly man”.Using 'Bible online' you can see those contexts...!
(1 Corinthians 2:14)Cornel
Advertisement