sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    ℹ️ Licensed Extensions | FredoBatch, ElevationProfile, FredoSketch, LayOps, MatSim and Pic2Shape will require license from Sept 1st More Info

    Creating Rope - More Explanation Needed

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved SketchUp Discussions
    sketchup
    14 Posts 7 Posters 10.2k Views 7 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M Offline
      mlammert
      last edited by

      Hi all,

      I am interested in creating some rope-like looking cables...

      I found this tutorial on the Google site:
      http://sketchup.google.com/3dwarehouse/details?mid=a1d0f59bb2a6325d1672893bc20b4763

      I understand the concept behind the helix spirals and the Tube Along Path script... I have successfully completed this on a "straight" spiral... However, can anyone explain to me how this person "wrapped" the spirals around the centerline to create the "rope"???

      TaffGoch seems to be a very talented individual!!!

      Thank you very much,
      Mark

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M Offline
        mlammert
        last edited by

        I don't know why this was posted twice... I only submitted it once...

        Sorry, I apologize...

        Admin, please feel free to delete the duplicate if you would like...

        Mark

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • R Offline
          remus
          last edited by

          You can delete it yourself by editing the post then selecting the 'delete post'tick box. I think its just above the bit where you enter your post.


          Capture.JPG

          http://remusrendering.wordpress.com/

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • TaffGochT Offline
            TaffGoch
            last edited by

            Mark,

            I included, in that rope model, a group (off-screen) that shows the technique I used for making the 3 helical paths. For more explanation, you can refer to this 'quickie' demo model, just now posted:

            Error 404 (Not Found)!!1

            favicon

            (sketchup.google.com)

            Regards,
            Taff


            SketchUp 6.0.515(free) / Win XP Pro / nVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M


            Capture_3-19-2008.png

            "Information is not knowledge." -- Albert Einstein

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • A Offline
              AndriyG81
              last edited by

              I just tried it myself. Great tutorial.
              I did my own curved rope seems to work well, but it is somewhat time consuming.
              I did it by first drawing a curved path, the way i want my rope. Then use circle and follow me tool on that curve. Next turn on hidden lines and using new shape as a reference draw 3 independed guide lines for your rope. Next delete original shape, leaving only 3 guidelines, use follow me tool on each of them individually to produce a rope... done πŸ˜‰

              http://andriyg.com

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • M Offline
                mlammert
                last edited by

                I think that makes sense... πŸ˜„

                I will give it a try either tonight or this weekend...

                Thanks!!!

                Mark

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S Offline
                  SchreiberBike
                  last edited by

                  Rope is a real challenge. I worked on some a while ago, but I couldn't get anything I was satisfied with. My skills are better now, I hope to go back to see if I can improve my work.

                  Another fun challenge is knots.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • bigstickB Offline
                    bigstick
                    last edited by

                    Try thisishot-3.jpg

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S Offline
                      SchreiberBike
                      last edited by

                      TaffGoch, that is very impressive. Inspires me to go back to some of my rope ideas.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • TaffGochT Offline
                        TaffGoch
                        last edited by

                        bigstick,

                        That works quickly, when modeling along a straight line. I've used it as well:

                        'Three-Strand Rope Study'
                        http://sketchup.google.com/3dwarehouse/details?mid=6314b47c3c79791861748fff0acb7ad

                        But how do you draw convoluted, irregular rope arrangements?

                        I've tried modifying the above technique; doing the follow-me, selecting each joint and rotating it around the centerline (in increments as I move along the rope.) That was so time consuming (and eye-crossing.)

                        Through more experiments...

                        'Rope Twist Study'
                        http://sketchup.google.com/3dwarehouse/details?mid=6509d5585ba63ac5b5b34ecf8890b0ef

                        'Rope Grommet Study'
                        http://sketchup.google.com/3dwarehouse/details?mid=c1cd24304534076bdfb305973222a554

                        'Bowline β€’ 3-Strand Rope β€’ Construction'
                        http://sketchup.google.com/3dwarehouse/details?mid=a1d0f59bb2a6325d1672893bc20b4763

                        ...I settled on the 'helices-on-cylinder' approach depicted in the last one. It may produce more geometry, but doesn't take as long to model.


                        AndriyG81,

                        Your description sounds like the 'Rope Grommet Study' above. Is that how you do it, too? (Or am I reading your description wrong, and you have another method I could possibly try?)


                        Regards,
                        Taff

                        "Information is not knowledge." -- Albert Einstein

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • bigstickB Offline
                          bigstick
                          last edited by

                          Taff,

                          Your methods are just way nicer and far more accurate (fabulous collection of stuff on the 3d warehouse by the way - stunning), but are really heavy on geometry. If you just want to create a complex shape and little else, your approach is way better. For more complex shapes I would probably duplicate the component along a path and rotate manually after.

                          I was intrigued by the challenge and thought I could do this using a low-poly approach. For complex shapes it's really not ideal, but if you wanted a rope component as a small part of a bigger scene, using lots of geometry will kill processing time, and if you want to render - you'll have to be patient and cross your fingers!

                          Hwyl! πŸ˜‰

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • TaffGochT Offline
                            TaffGoch
                            last edited by

                            bigstick,

                            I haven't yet discovered a low-poly means of construction, either.

                            If rope is serving as merely a component in a larger model, it would logically be better to depict the appearance of rope with a texture on a cylindrial surface. Unfortunately, the texture doesn't register very well between adjacent faces. It ends up looking more like patchwork, rather than rope.

                            I was hoping someone else might have worked this out. Oh well...

                            ...but I did indeed enjoy working on the geometric problem. As you've noticed from my models, I seem to favor geometric constructions over more 'practical' uses of SketchUp. (I can't understand how some folks complain about lack of precision in SketchUp - I love it.)


                            Now that I think about it some more, one idea that should work is to stop at the 3-helix stage, leaving the helices visible on the surface of a colored cylindrical 'tube.' The tube would then provide the appearance of rope, without actually having to model the strands. (To put it another way, instead of the helices defining the centerlines of the strands, they would serve as apparent edges between strands.)

                            Close-up, it looks pretty lame, but from a distance, as part of a larger model, it should serve as a reasonable facsimile of rope.

                            Hwyl mawr,
                            Taff
                            (Glad to see that someone got the Welsh nickname reference.)


                            RopeSim.jpg

                            "Information is not knowledge." -- Albert Einstein

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • bigstickB Offline
                              bigstick
                              last edited by

                              @taffgoch said:

                              If rope is serving as merely a component in a larger model, it would logically be better to depict the appearance of rope with a texture on a cylindrial surface.

                              Actually that's what I usually do for narrow cables, but for closeup work, there's nothing like some nicely-modelled geometry.

                              @taffgoch said:

                              I can't understand how some folks complain about lack of precision in SketchUp - I love it.)

                              Actually I don't understand how you have modelled some of your work. The rope noose really intrigues me!

                              @taffgoch said:

                              Now that I think about it some more, one idea that should work is to stop at the 3-helix stage, leaving the helices visible on the surface of a colored cylindrical 'tube.'

                              Or maybe make them flush, intersect and delete them. It is potentially a great candidate for a Ruby plugin. A combination of a new 'helix along path' routine combined with the 'pipe along path' plugin.

                              @taffgoch said:

                              Glad to see that someone got the Welsh nickname reference
                              πŸ˜›

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • Alan FraserA Offline
                                Alan Fraser
                                last edited by

                                Some beautiful geometry there Mr. Red. Actually it is possible to get a reasonable approximation of rope or other helical structures just using an image mapped to a cylindrical extrusion. It gets a little dodgy on the tighter curves, but in a large model serve its purpose pretty well.
                                Link

                                3D Figures
                                Were you required to walk 500 miles? Were you advised to walk 500 more?
                                You could be entitled to compensation. Call the Pro Claimers now!

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • 1 / 1
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                Buy SketchPlus
                                Buy SUbD
                                Buy WrapR
                                Buy eBook
                                Buy Modelur
                                Buy Vertex Tools
                                Buy SketchCuisine
                                Buy FormFonts

                                Advertisement