Grumman G-44 Widgeon
-
Weeks.
Looking good Bryan, my old Mam used to say...what's worth having is worth waiting for.
Have you tried TIG's Extrusion tool set, they're great.
John
-
@tadema said:
Weeks.
Looking good Bryan, my old Mam used to say...what's worth having is worth waiting for.
Have you tried TIG's Extrusion tool set, they're great.
John
Oh NOW you tell me.
(seriously, I WILL have to try those on another project or on this one if needed. They look incredible!)For now, I'm sticking with Curviloft and intersect model when required.
I was going to put serious hours into this today, but I'm not feeling too good. Not sick, just not "all here". I am still planning on working on it some, though.
-
Here's what 7 hours look like. A tail. Yep. That's it. Why? Because things that could go wrong did go wrong. Zoom was unstable. Intersect model didn't work right the first 6 times. Polygons were not closing right. Groups and components kept giving me problems. I really think my PC is getting old.
But mostly, zoom was being a pain and making it hard to do detail work. It would often go right past the area I wanted to focus on and then it would zoom out only extremely slowly.
But hey, not a bad looking tail, right? If you look close, you can see the pivot pins in the rudder and trim tab.
Noticed more problems with the main fuselage. sigh Some major rework right there.
Another thing I've learned is the blueprint much be really sharp. The ones I have are fuzzy crap close up, so I'm having to guess a lot where things connect.
-
Hmm. Only took about and hour and half for the clean up.
-
Looking damned good!
I can tell this is going to be one fine model.
You inspired me to take a crack at an airplane. Whaddya think?
Thinking about adding some weapons, and maybe some wheels with high-speed hubcaps. -
@hellnbak said:
Thinking about adding some weapons, and maybe some wheels with high-speed hubcaps.
Nah just some go faster stripes and it's done.
Bryan, if you get tempted to do another flying boat there is a rather larger type that might make use of sketchup v15 called the Saunders Roe Princess. The largest all metal flying boat ever flown. Not sure exactly how it would match up to the Spruce Goose but it is certainly a big beast. Ten turboprops would make a bit of a racket though so ear defenders might be needed.
-
I tried out your version Hellnbak, it seems to have some minor design flaws.
-
There's no design flaws there Box! It's just a matter of faith and thrust! Trusth me, you have to give it some thrust!
-
Bad news I'm afraid JQL, I ran the tests with extra thrust and even in the blueprints it's back to the drawing board.
-
-
no no no no no no no...........
he means REAL WEAPONS! guns!
-
@hellnbak said:
Looking damned good!
I can tell this is going to be one fine model.
You inspired me to take a crack at an airplane. Whaddya think?
Thinking about adding some weapons, and maybe some wheels with high-speed hubcaps.Thanks.
That's actually pretty cool! No joke, that would look awesome.
-
The rest of you guys?
Love it.(BTW Jon, that is a really great picture of a modern Widgeon. I see Chuck is there as the wind (and weapons) beneath its wings.
) -
@mike amos said:
@hellnbak said:
Thinking about adding some weapons, and maybe some wheels with high-speed hubcaps.
Nah just some go faster stripes and it's done.
Bryan, if you get tempted to do another flying boat there is a rather larger type that might make use of sketchup v15 called the Saunders Roe Princess. The largest all metal flying boat ever flown. Not sure exactly how it would match up to the Spruce Goose but it is certainly a big beast. Ten turboprops would make a bit of a racket though so ear defenders might be needed.
That is beautiful. Yes, I was tempted by many other choices but picked the G-44 because it looked the simplest. (I'm still working my way up as a modeler)
-
It's looking good Bryan, can't wait to get my hands on it for flight testing.
-
-
@box said:
It's looking good Bryan, can't wait to get my hands on it for flight testing.
That's the way we used to test them in the Air Force. Never could get that going-back-together part quite right though
BTW, how the heck do you do those videos? I'd love to do something like that for fun
-
I just knocked up a simple plane in sections, then dropped it using sketchy physics and recorded it with a screen grab gif recorder.
-
@box said:
I just knocked up a simple plane in sections, then dropped it using sketchy physics and recorded it with a screen grab gif recorder.
Ummmm....ok. I might download sketchyphysics and play with it, not sure I can figure out something like that tho.
You say you built the plane in sections (I assume you mean so that it could break apart on impact). But did you have to tell it how to break apart, or does it do that on it's own when encountering a surface? -
@hellnbak said:
@box said:
I just knocked up a simple plane in sections, then dropped it using sketchy physics and recorded it with a screen grab gif recorder.
Ummmm....ok. I might download sketchyphysics and play with it, not sure I can figure out something like that tho.
You say you built the plane in sections (I assume you mean so that it could break apart on impact). But did you have to tell it how to break apart, or does it do that on it's own when encountering a surface?SketchyPhysics does it. SP is very, very cool. Check out their website.
Advertisement