[Plugin] Extrude Edges by Faces

DIEGO-RODRIGUEZ

another example of what could be its plugins.

[flash=800,600:1poz4zaw]http://www.youtube.com/v/K8fA4TItuCA&fs=1[/flash:1poz4zaw]

generated with the same geometry:
1 - draw metal
2 - patchface
3 - extrudeedgesbyface
4 - Extrude Edges by Rails

simon le bon

Thank you So much TIG for that new tool.
We see You producing with the power of an iron horse (I can't imagine where you are finding the time!) a complete set of amazing and so necessary Extrusion tools.

In the present case, it seems that Kirill have developped a very similar tool: [Plugin] 2 Faces + Path ver. 1.5. What do you think ?

I am going to watch for differences, but unlike you I always run after time.

very friendly, simon

TIG

Tool has been updated -
1.1 20100220 Color coding of picked faces/curves added.
ProfileFaceEdges=Cyan
Rail=Magenta
MeldingProfileFaceEdges=DarkCyan
See here for download link http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?p=226249#p226249

sjlee

I always appreciate your works!

But I have the problem that after running EEbFaces,
there is no results through mesh-maker(?).
I got only some cpoints such like the attatched image.

Could you explain what's wrong?

Sincerely.

TIG

Without the skp - it's a 'no'...
BUT two 'flat' faces can produce odd results - especially with an unmatched segment count to the faces' edges.
Have you tried welding the faces' edges into curves and using EEbyRails instead with the 'arc' picked as both paths ?
Or EEbyLoft on these faces' [now] curved edges might give the result you want...
Or wait for Fredo's CurviLoft which seems more stable for problems combos like these

TIG

Here's an update http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?p=226249#p226249
Smoothing now ignores edges with only one face...

pilou

Seems there is a little glitch ?
Meding profile is just the first profile scaled

glitch.skp

TIG

@unknownuser said:

Seems there is a little glitch ?
Melding profile is just the first profile scaled
You have that in your two faces !
Isn't that what it's supposed to do?
Change the second face you get a different result - see my screengrab.
It would probably be a better idea the place the faces at the start end of the rail too ?

pilou

The little "flats side" disapear/transform along the path!

But yes put the forms on the path resolves the problem

TIG

@unknownuser said:

The little "flats side" disappear/transform along the path!
But yes put the forms on the path resolve the problem
That is because placing them at the extremities of the path-rail fixes their relationship to the path; otherwise an assumed relationship is inferred from each profile's vertex nearest to the rail start/end as appropriate - hence the 'twisting' that you had.