[Plugin] Import OBJ with Materials v2.1 20131118

TIG

Here's v1.5 20100816 Missing 'group' in some types of OBJ code trapped [with "g OBJ"].
http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?p=172790#p172790

xrok1

thomthom

I tried out this importer on a obj I had exported from SU - then edited in PS.
On importing it back to SU I noticed some errors. Attached is the model and screenshots from SU vs Max:

SketchUp 3Ds Max

p.s.: the topic title doesn't reflect the current version.

Think I zipped all the files...

thomthom

Just noticed another glitch above the left front light.

jsteacy

TIG, I tried using your script to import .obj files from this website http://www.modelplusmodel.com, and it doesn't work. note that it didn't work for the simlab importer as well, something about negative indexes of the faces. Can you look into it? Also reading through the posts trying to get a better understanding of the .obj file type. Does every obj file need a mtl file for materials and textures?

TIG

@jsteacy said:

TIG, I tried using your script to import .OBJ files from this website http://www.modelplusmodel.com, and it doesn't work. Note that it didn't work for the Simlab Importer as well, something about negative indexes of the faces. Can you look into it? Also reading through the posts trying to get a better understanding of the .OBJ file type. Does every OBJ file need an MTL file for materials and textures?

That site's free-sample bird 3DS file imported OK [in Pro] - see below...
BUT the OBJ file format...
To answer your questions first...
If there is no MTL file then there are no colors/materials in the resulting mesh.
If there is an MTL file but no images in the defined ../folder_path/file_name then there objects with materials specified will only get the color without the texture.

The f 123/123 124/124 125/125 is the correct way for a face to be specified in an OBJ file - this face is triangular, and uses vertices 123/124/125 [v] and the equivalent texture vertices [vt].
I can't see why their OBJ file format uses negative values at all !!!

My OBJ Importer is not foolproof... BUT can you point me at exact problem [OBJ[MTL] files... or PM me them ?
I can change my code to trap for any negative values for 'face indices' [see below]... BUT the imported object might end up being rubbish anyway ? I suspect that we need a miracle ??

Jim

negative vertex references are legal in the .obj format.

f -1 -2 -3

this just means use the vertexes defined 1, 2, and 3 lines previous. Negative index values mean a relative offset from the current line. (I think. ) Not sure if it includes all lines, or just 'v' lines in the count, though.

notareal

"BUT the imported object might end up being rubbish anyway ? I suspect that we need a miracle ??"
I believe it can be done... well just tested and Thea did import that 'F06 House bird' OK... sorry I don't have internal details how importer will actually handle this model.

Jim

Since Ruby has negative array indexes already, and the .obj is imported in at least a recognizable format, it may be something simple like an off-by-one error for negative indexes.

jsteacy

I tried all of them including the house bird, and nothing gets imported. This is what I get from the console after I click the units to import to:

Error; #<ArgumentError; Cannot convert argument to Sketchup;;Point3d>
C;/Program Files/Google/Google SketchUp 7/Plugins/obj_importer.rb;278;in `add'
C;/Program Files/Google/Google SketchUp 7/Plugins/obj_importer.rb;278;in `run'
C;/Program Files/Google/Google SketchUp 7/Plugins/obj_importer.rb;278;in `map'
C;/Program Files/Google/Google SketchUp 7/Plugins/obj_importer.rb;278;in `run'
C;/Program Files/Google/Google SketchUp 7/Plugins/obj_importer.rb;208;in `each'
C;/Program Files/Google/Google SketchUp 7/Plugins/obj_importer.rb;208;in `run'
C;/Program Files/Google/Google SketchUp 7/Plugins/obj_importer.rb;329
C;/Program Files/Google/Google SketchUp 7/Plugins/obj_importer.rb;329;in `call'

hope that helps

TIG

So if the face-indices are 'negative' then we work backwards through the face vertex lists ? - i.e we reverse the array of v's, and take the abs value as the index ?

Jim

Line 248:


values.each do |v|
w = v.split("/")
vvv = Integer(w[0])
if vvv <= -2 # this 
  vvv += 1
end
face<<Integer(vvv)
face_uvs.push(w[1].to_i)if w[1]

And maybe look at fill_from_mesh instead of a dd_faces_from_mesh. # Line 302. Probably left over from someone else..

I'm shocked it actually seems to have worked - it was just a hunch.

TIG

Here's a slightly different version that I was working on independently - it also works !
http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?p=172790#p172790 [v1.7 has fill from mesh changes too]

thomthom

Any ideas what caused these glitches? http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?f=323&t=20584&start=75#p264875

TIG

Thomthom, I assume you are referring to the size/units ?
If the file has a '# units = meters' line then the importer defaults to 'meters' [or whatever it says].
If it doesn't then it defaults to 'inches'.
However, as it starts a dialog lets you choose whatever units you'd like to use anyway [preset to those default units].
Some meshes don't form the tiny faces if the units are set too small - e.g. if you were to choose 'mm' when it was made in 'meters'. So if you are unclear about the units and none are specified then you can try out alternatives until you get a proper mesh without holes...
The reason the tool has three options is speed - 'as mesh' is fast but can fail when the OBJ code is convoluted; otherwise the textures can be added or not as desired.
The old sizing issue seems resolved.
PS: I can't tested your problem 'van' OBJ/MTL because PPartner010000.jpg wasn't in the zip file?
But I can see that its geometry seems a bit messed up around the side windows and the image file-names have spaces in them which confuses the MTL parser. I thought that you were 'recommended' to avoid having spaces in these paths/names - however, manually editing the MTL and the corresponding image-names so they are without spaces fixes that... BUT the 'PPartner010000.jpg' file is still missing altogether - see the Ruby Console error reporting

TIG

Busy today! Heres 1.8 - Trapped for spaces in image-names/paths.
http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?p=172790#p172790

thomthom

@tig said:

Thomthom, I assume you are referring to the size/units ?

No - it was the messed up geometry you noticed. You see it in the screenshots I posted - with the red circles.

@tig said:

PS: I can't tested your problem 'van' OBJ/MTL because PPartner010000.jpg wasn't in the zip file?
But I can see that its geometry seems a bit messed up around the side windows and the image file-names have spaces in them which confuses the MTL parser. I thought that you were 'recommended' to avoid having spaces in these paths/names - however, manually editing the MTL and the corresponding image-names so they are without spaces fixes that... BUT the 'PPartner010000.jpg' file is still missing altogether - see the Ruby Console error reporting

The OBJ was initially created by SketchUp - then edited textures in PhotoShop.

I've attached the missing texture.

Will try v 1.8

missing texture

thomthom

Even with 1.8 some geometry is messed up. Seem to be the same faces.

TIG

I see the messed up UV textures.
I re-imported it as 'mm' and the messed geometry went.
BUT I had to edit the faulty UV mapped parts manually.
As it's symmetrical a quick mirror/copy of the correct panel on the other side fixed them.
The 'Badge' is messed up though - did you map that on separately ?
I've no idea why just those few parts fail to map properly
VAN.skp

thomthom

I import in mm - but it's not just the UV being messed up. It's the actual geometry.
Notice that for the incorrect mapping the face is split diagonally-crossing itself - as opposed to the mirrored side.
When you compare against the 3ds import you see that Max does not do this.

I did not do anything to the mapping other than take the OBS into PS and adding the text on the side of the van. The model came from a pre-modelled and pre-mapped third party model.

I wonder if it's the order of the vertices that's abnormal in these cases... ?