sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    ℹ️ Licensed Extensions | FredoBatch, ElevationProfile, FredoSketch, LayOps, MatSim and Pic2Shape will require license from Sept 1st More Info

    Photo Match for Professional Architectural Photomontages

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved SketchUp Discussions
    sketchup
    27 Posts 14 Posters 7.6k Views 14 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • L Offline
      linea
      last edited by

      As dcauldwell said I think photomatch is really good for smaller buildings. I don't think that 3d Studio or AutoCad are significantly more accurate though when it comes to complex geometry. I tend to just go out with the camera and photograph every elevation I need and then apply them all as textures to an estimated or measured model. it takes longer but it is much more accurate

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • thomthomT Offline
        thomthom
        last edited by

        Now I am confused?
        Are we talking about using photomatch just to extract textures, or photomatch to display a model in actual context? I thought the OP was talking about the latter.

        Thomas Thomassen — SketchUp Monkey & Coding addict
        List of my plugins and link to the CookieWare fund

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • L Offline
          linea
          last edited by

          Yes, sorry, drifted away from the thread a bit there

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • dcauldwellD Offline
            dcauldwell
            last edited by

            @unknownuser said:

            I would really love to use Sketchup for this photomontaging but am a bit concerned as to its accuracy as it doesnt require camera location, focal lenght etc.

            Personally I wouldn't hesitate to use it for small or large buildings.
            Although it doesnt require camera location, focal length etc, the technique it uses is equally as good - matching persective.
            It gets easier to set up if the photo you are matching is taken at approx 45deg on plan, but clearly this is often not possible - so you make do.
            As photographs are often flawed in some way (barrel or pincushion distortion) it still comes down to making final adjustments by eye.
            For the record, the process I use is:-
            a) on site take several photos, guessing at where you will prefer your viewpoint for the finished montage
            b) create the model and match it to the photo in SU
            c) render the model (I use vray)
            d) export the render (I use png files)
            e) Using photoshop (or equiv) paste into a new layer over the photo - sometimes you need to create further layers and copy foreground info so it displays in front of the rendered model.

            Its dead easy once you've done a couple of times!!

            David

            Sketchup 2017
            (vray 2.00)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • plot-parisP Offline
              plot-paris
              last edited by

              dcauldwell, amazing image. it took me quite a while to understand which part is not real 👍

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • I Offline
                idraft
                last edited by

                I found and saved these a while ago, very good show on how to set up perspectives (as tought in the old school days). 👍

                Cheers Jeff


                2pt overview


                2pt matching


                3pt overview


                3pt construction


                3pt matching

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • pilouP Offline
                  pilou
                  last edited by

                  Cool tuts! 😎
                  Will be a classic! 😎

                  Frenchy Pilou
                  Is beautiful that please without concept!
                  My Little site :)

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • I Offline
                    idraft
                    last edited by

                    A quick sample of my photo matching, this was done in SU6 in about 1 hr straight from an origonal photo, can give clients a very good ex. of what there addition looks like.

                    I had to model the letterbox, fence and tree in foreground then locate in photomatched model. The picture probably needs fixing up in photoshop / gimp or similar to take some edges of.

                    cheers Jeff


                    photo match 0


                    photo match 7

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • MALAISEM Offline
                      MALAISE
                      last edited by

                      Thanks for such a useful tut. It really explains perspective rules . 👍 👍
                      I'm translating it in French

                      MALAISE 😄

                      La Connaissance n'a de valeur que partagée

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • G Offline
                        GUNAWAN W
                        last edited by

                        @dcauldwell said:

                        Here is an example
                        (the modelled and vray rendered part is the rear single storey extension)

                        http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/4769/5108002crop2mh3.jpg

                        David

                        So david,
                        where is your models?
                        it's seems like photograph for me 😄

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • dcauldwellD Offline
                          dcauldwell
                          last edited by

                          G

                          Here is the rendered model. It is then merged in with the photograph in PS.
                          The mirror ball in the foreground was to check out the HDR sky, to see if it was positioned correctly.

                          Cheers David

                          http://img381.imageshack.us/img381/5998/004oz1.png

                          Sketchup 2017
                          (vray 2.00)

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • marked001M Offline
                            marked001
                            last edited by

                            the other problem with photomatch for me, is that is creates a 2 point perspective or some odd setup.. which isnt supported by Maxwell... so its useless... my workaround is to use photomatch..tape a piece of trace to the screen.. trace over a few key edges... and then use that to create my own scene... 😉 haha..

                            http://www.revision21vis.com

                            instagram: revi21on

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • dcauldwellD Offline
                              dcauldwell
                              last edited by

                              . . . and if you make a mistake, do you use correction fluid on the screen? I'd love to see you working on a sketch!

                              I think SU actually creates a 3 point perspective, but because most photos are taken at eye level they look like 2 point.

                              David

                              Sketchup 2017
                              (vray 2.00)

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • marked001M Offline
                                marked001
                                last edited by

                                haha... yeah, its definitley a half a$$ method..i admit!

                                i dont know.. they do appear to be 3 point, but i dont know, they are weird.. and Maxwell & Podium dont support them when the output 😕

                                http://www.revision21vis.com

                                instagram: revi21on

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • G Offline
                                  GUNAWAN W
                                  last edited by

                                  @dcauldwell said:

                                  G
                                  Here is the rendered model. It is then merged in with the photograph in PS.
                                  The mirror ball in the foreground was to check out the HDR sky, to see if it was positioned correctly.
                                  Cheers David

                                  geeez, i see, really impressive work 👍 👍

                                  allow me to add this link to video tutorial section.

                                  Thank's

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • A Offline
                                    August
                                    last edited by

                                    Hi idraft,
                                    @idraft said:

                                    I found and saved these a while ago, very good show on how to set up perspectives (as tought in the old school days).

                                    Do you happen to know the original author? Your use of the word "found" suggests that it is not you.

                                    Also, ANYONE,

                                    Months ago I ran across a similar tutorial about the geometry of photo matching that I have not been able to find again. (It was saved on my employer's laptop and was in a folder I missed in my last-minute archiving on the day of the layoff. Word to the wise...)

                                    The tutorial I'm looking for, if I recall correctly, used a ranch-style house and constructed the camera position(s) someplace in the front yard. Again IIRC, it took a different approach than the files idraft found. In the above files A-E, the image plane and view line are straight and an object is constructed at an angle and then finally rotated to square. In the tutorial I'm looking for, the object was presumed square with the axes and the technique constructed the image plane at an angle. Also, IIRC, it did not use any actual photos but instead illustrated the geometry with a line drawing instead of a photo.

                                    I suspect that this "missing" tutorial was old, possibly from SU v4, prior to the built-in Photo Match tool.

                                    Does this ring any bells in anyone's memory?

                                    Thanks,
                                    August

                                    “An idea, like a ghost, must be spoken to a little before it will explain itself.”
                                    [floatr:v1mcbde2]-- Charles Dickens[/floatr:v1mcbde2]

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • I Offline
                                      idraft
                                      last edited by

                                      This is where I found them back in 2004 (remember then?)
                                      http://groups.google.com/group/Sketchup-Pro/browse_thread/thread/14168c7bbabd829/bd0617c15f78519d

                                      Seems like there are two authors being Michael Young and Ron Kempke (3pt construction). The download of the .skp files is in the link above. 👍

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • A Offline
                                        August
                                        last edited by

                                        Thanks idraft,
                                        @idraft said:

                                        This is where I found them back in 2004 ...

                                        The download is in the first message in that thread, which seems to be wrapping up a previous discussion from elsewhere.

                                        The thread includes a very good discussion of field-of-view and how it relates to the angle in the human eye where peripheral vision takes over from the sharper vision of the retina's central area.

                                        It also has an offer from rkempke in October 2005 to put together step-by-step tutorials using camera_parameters.rb, but that was apparently delayed by "solutions for every conceivable situation you may encounter in a 1-pt., 2-pt., or 3-pt. perspective, but each situation requires its own tutorial with a unique set of instructions and calculations."

                                        If anyone knows if Ron ever completed that project, I for one would be VERY interested. That offer was the most recent post from him containing the word "perspective".

                                        Thanks,
                                        August

                                        “An idea, like a ghost, must be spoken to a little before it will explain itself.”
                                        [floatr:v1mcbde2]-- Charles Dickens[/floatr:v1mcbde2]

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • A Offline
                                          August
                                          last edited by

                                          @idraft said:

                                          http://groups.google.com/group/Sketchup-Pro/browse_thread/thread/14168c7bbabd829/bd0617c15f78519d

                                          That thread also included an offer from Todd Burch, "I'm sure I can write this in Ruby... it's just a time thing right now."

                                          I suspect all such efforts were put aside when v5 (I think) introduced the PhotoMatch tool.

                                          However, PhotoMatch has its limitations. I'm pursuing this because I'm interested in getting 3D positions of points when you have several photos from different angles that contain the same points, but you have few or no perspective lines/edges at all.

                                          Thanks again,
                                          August

                                          “An idea, like a ghost, must be spoken to a little before it will explain itself.”
                                          [floatr:v1mcbde2]-- Charles Dickens[/floatr:v1mcbde2]

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • 1
                                          • 2
                                          • 1 / 2
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          Buy SketchPlus
                                          Buy SUbD
                                          Buy WrapR
                                          Buy eBook
                                          Buy Modelur
                                          Buy Vertex Tools
                                          Buy SketchCuisine
                                          Buy FormFonts

                                          Advertisement