sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. Stinkie
    3. Posts
    Oops, your profile's looking a bit empty! To help us tailor your experience, please fill in key details like your SketchUp version, skill level, operating system, and more. Update and save your info on your profile page today!
    πŸ”Œ Easy Offset | Offset selected faces in SketchUp in positive and negative offsets. Download
    Offline
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 210
    • Posts 3,411
    • Groups 1

    Posts

    Recent Best Controversial
    • RE: Old scene rendered in Artlantis 2

      I was finally able to check the Artlantis gallery. I have to admit there's some very nice images in there. Yet, if I had 900 € to spare (and I just might), I think I wouldn't spend them on Artlantis. I'd rather squander them on Maxwell (easy now, Pete πŸ‘Ώ ), as its output quality is much better, in my opinion. (Indigo offers superior workflow, but - alas! - does not have Multilight. 😒 ) Is this a matter of personal taste and needs? Only to a certain extent, I think.

      I guess my conclusion is that Artlantis is a tad too pricy for the kind of output it offers. IMO ❗

      posted in Gallery
      StinkieS
      Stinkie
    • RE: SU Styles + Render

      Thanks for the links. I'm not the world's biggest fan of npr rendering, but I find these well-executed. Yes, Pete, so are yours. πŸ˜„

      posted in Gallery
      StinkieS
      Stinkie
    • RE: Old scene rendered in Artlantis 2

      The Artlantis site seems to be unreachable today. So I did a Google search for Artlantis images. The app doesn't seem to be the best choice for photorealistic rendering. I must admit, however, that I did see a couple of very attractive npr renders. ❗ ❗ But 900 €? I'm guessing Artlantis comes with callgirls and cocaine.

      No, seriously, why is it so expensive? I am genuinely wondering, not taking a stab at the Artlantis people.

      posted in Gallery
      StinkieS
      Stinkie
    • RE: SU Styles + Render

      I somehow missed Lewis' post. Looks very appealing.

      posted in Gallery
      StinkieS
      Stinkie
    • RE: Old scene rendered in Artlantis 2

      900 euro? That's quite a lot of money. Too much, IMO.

      posted in Gallery
      StinkieS
      Stinkie
    • RE: Indigo, baby!

      @whaat said:

      The importance of quick setup time is extremely underrated. My primary goals with SkIndigo were quick setup time, ease of use, and fast/intuitive workflow.

      Yes, the UI of version 1.0+ was somewhat inspired by Podium. The core geometry export algorithm (a few lines of code) is the only remnant of SU2KT in SkIndigo. Everything else was rewritten.

      BTW, the official stable releases of Indigo / SkIndigo 1.0 are right around the corner. 😎

      Well, you succeeded. I owe both you and TBD. If it weren't for Podium and (Sk)Indigo, well, I probably would be rendering a lot less. πŸ‘

      posted in Gallery
      StinkieS
      Stinkie
    • RE: Indigo, baby!

      Already did. There's some groovy images in there. πŸ‘

      posted in Gallery
      StinkieS
      Stinkie
    • RE: Indigo, baby!

      Yeah ... (Sk)Indigo provides a smooth and easy workflow. For most materials, I just use Whaats presets and tweak from there, using the reflection and exponent sliders. No need for adjusting Fresnel etc. πŸ’š

      And as for render time: I own a copy of modo, which is very, very fast. However, if I wanted to do that interior I posted in modo, well, that would've taken A LOT of tweaking and test rendering. And I seriously doubt the result would be as good.

      posted in Gallery
      StinkieS
      Stinkie
    • RE: Indigo, baby!

      Unbiased rendering takes long, that's just how it is. Maxwell's slow, Fry is, and so is Indigo. But for some things it's just the best solution. (As is biased rendering. Both methods have their advantages. ❗ ❗ ❗ )

      Indigo may render slow, but it sure does produce good results. Without a complicated UI, a lot of setting up etc. That interior I posted maybe took me 1/2 hour to set up.

      posted in Gallery
      StinkieS
      Stinkie
    • RE: .studio console. ++updated with pics++

      Looks good. πŸ˜„

      posted in Gallery
      StinkieS
      Stinkie
    • RE: Indigo, baby!

      I should learn to express myself more clearly. πŸ˜„

      What I meant is: I think Whaat was inspired by the Podium UI. For the look and feel, I mean.

      posted in Gallery
      StinkieS
      Stinkie
    • RE: Indigo, baby!

      @sepo said:

      Nice one Stinkie. It looks you are enjoying the Indigo a lot.

      I do. It's straight forward and delivers results - which is what I like about SU and Podium too. I think I read somewhere Whaat based the exporter's UI on Podium's.

      posted in Gallery
      StinkieS
      Stinkie
    • RE: Podium for Mac

      @unknownuser said:

      so i guess they will be releasing a mac version eventually but it's going to be a different engine than the version they have now..

      That's right. 2.0 will be using another engine. Is it good? Yes, it is. In fact, it's very good. Stay tuned. πŸ’š

      posted in Extensions & Applications Discussions
      StinkieS
      Stinkie
    • RE: Podium for Mac

      @mike lucey said:

      'Workflow' is TBD's (Tavi's) middle name πŸ‘

      Mike

      Correct. πŸ’š

      posted in Extensions & Applications Discussions
      StinkieS
      Stinkie
    • RE: Indigo, baby!

      @ Whaat: thanks. And thanks again for the exporter. πŸ’š What can I say? I am picky. If I have the choice between 'reasonably clean' and 'spotless', I choose the latter. Of course, I'm no pro. I have the luxury of time. Oh, btw: those presets of yours? Work great. 'Leather' does wonders for wooden floors. πŸ˜„ More, please. πŸ’š

      @ Solo: thanks! Still so much to learn though. I'll be revisiting both mr. Chopra's and mrs. Roskes books again soon. Got any other reading tips?

      I'll post a final render of the interior some time soon.

      posted in Gallery
      StinkieS
      Stinkie
    • RE: Indigo, baby!

      Thanks, lads.

      Anssi, the interior rendered for about 10 hrs. The exteriors for about 48 hrs. The originals are pretty big and I wanted 'em noise free, so ... Mind you, these were done on an octo core. If I'd used my dual core ... well ... Would've taken a week, or so. πŸ˜†

      The interior needs quite a lot of additional work. So I'll have to re-render. 😐

      posted in Gallery
      StinkieS
      Stinkie
    • Indigo, baby!

      The exterior is all SU. The interior is ... eclectic. (And rather imperfect. Still working on it.)


      ext1.jpg


      ext2.jpg


      int.jpg

      posted in Gallery
      StinkieS
      Stinkie
    • RE: Abstract Sculpture Building

      I say we call it art, and name it "The Miesian Grid Can Sod Off".

      Joking aside, I'm pretty confident I can not model curves like that. 😒

      posted in Gallery
      StinkieS
      Stinkie
    • RE: Reasons....

      Awesome renders, no question about it. Extremely well done, IMO.

      posted in Gallery
      StinkieS
      Stinkie
    • RE: Abstract Sculpture Building

      Backdoor ... ! Backdoor ... ! πŸŽ‰

      No, I really must restrain myself.

      posted in Gallery
      StinkieS
      Stinkie
    • 1 / 1