great!I love this, very good;)

poster-jessalba

Can you maybe post the model in SKP format?
Then i can see how you build such a model.

poster-Gforce

Wow! I'll have to try that some day. :thup:

poster-AcousticGarden

First off, my first post here at the forums. I'm glad to see the potential of this great program. Just got it the other day and so far I love it.

As an avid cartoonist and illustrator with a taste for architechture I'm glad people have experimented with this else wise. By the looks of it this could have potential for some really fantastic cell shaded movie/game work!

Oh and, GREAT characters. Love 'em.

poster-gr!m

Look's very good! Did you draw this from an autocad floorplan, or something else?
By the way there are a lot of meeting rooms there, there aren't much computer office's.
Can you maybe post the entire building where this floor plan is from?

poster-Gforce

And here is 1 of the office's itself:

poster-Gforce

And here are some more:

poster-Gforce

@robmoors said:

Could you also post some floorplans so that we can get an idea on how the entire building is organised?

i don't have real floor plan's , because i designed it only in sketchup. But here are some more interior shot's:

poster-Gforce

I recently made this human research centre in Google sketchup.
It is the maximum i can het out of the program so far, after using it for 1 year or something. It is kind of a futuristic building, it is not ment to be realistic although it could be build. Those "stairs in the middle i designed like Dna strings, because it is a human research centre.
But i wonder what you folks think of it, and do you have something you would change?

poster-Gforce

Mike
CraigD & Modelhead for them to get so uptight and permanently give up this great Forum over this issue is truly baffeling? Issues ma man Issues.
Good riddence I say.
J1mmy

I think that Google "policing" themself is not the answer.
Information is everywhere and once you have or attempt to have guidelines on acceptable postings or content it leaves too much room for abuse by the thought police. This situation is no different than how traditional NEWS stories are sinsationalized by mainstream media. For example whan the Federal building was bombed in Oklahoma City. EVERY "news" source showed and told how the bomb was built what to do how it was planned how they were apprehended etc...etc... Basically it was/is a manual for mayhem.

The fact is that snuff films and alike have existed in folklore for decades. now with improved access anyone can see for themselfs. NOt just on youtube. The blame if their should be any? Is squarely on the viewer. The error of the viewer is a moral issue that in my opinion should only be policed in their own actions and mind.

If crimes against humanity are commited in such content those "people" who produce should be prosecuted
to the fullest extent of the NOW existing laws. NOT create new ones. To block them will only create more of them. also it will diminsh chance of conviction by pushing it further underground.

This so called crime against morality can be eliminated completely very very simply just buy not looking at it. Turn the dial so to speak.

Is Google you tube or any other wrong here? IMHO Legally NO Moraly should they police themself? Not to the extent of sensorship.

Should Craig stay away over this rediculous issue? Absolutely and take Crishideous with him.

Jimmy

think you're missing the point, James.

There is no doubt other material on YouTube that some would find objectionable and wish to have suppressed, and their arguments and their outrage would sound indistinguishable from yours and modelhead's.

Who decides what is worthy of censorship and what is not? What criteria should be used? There is no set of rules that some would not find too permissive and others too restrictive.

So we are left with the fundamental proposition: censorship is far more offensive to far more people than the most offensive recorded information.

This is not an issue with Google or with technology. I hear you saying that Google should "police" their web site, but I don't hear you saying that the police should police the streets of our cities where these brutal acts are taking place.

-Gully

James and modelhead,

Who will tell Google what material is acceptable and what they should censor? You?

And if Google does undertake to impose their own sense of morality on the material posted on YouTube, they will certainly be accused of suppressing free expression.

If I recall correctly, this forum recently had its own referendum on the subject of censorship when the moderators were accused of overreaching their authority by removing a controversial thread.

In my opinion, censorship generally does more harm than good. The price we must pay for our liberties is living in the same society as those who abuse them. This has always been the two-edged sword of a free society, but it's better by far than the alternative.

-Gully

Gee,Thanks Jackson , that sure help a bunch.
Will try that once I got the time
You hv a good weekend

Rgds
Tom Yong

Thanks Jackson for the info, yea really hope
some season SU-Vue user will chip in some valuable
experince & findings

Rgds
Tom Yong

Thanks Jackson,
U can call me Tom, I am very new to Vue(2 months old),
Like U I am annoy by the said problem and are
still trying to find a solution, maybe U
can share the solution when U find one

Rgds
Tom Yong

Hi Dylan,
I totally agree with you on the brightness.
but after nearly 2 hrs of rendering and its
only for a jug of beer I will just take it as a lesson learnt instead of re-rendering the shot
Client(friend paying with a jug of beer) cannot
complaint at all or else

Rgds
Tom Yong

Thanks Guys for the comment,
I'm still under testing mode, So
lots of figuring out to do

Thanks again

Rgds
Tom Yong

Hi Guys,
Attached are 2 render done for a friend's home
tot I share with u guys
day shot render time-1hr 45min
night shot 3hr 47min

Any C&C are most welcome
Hv a nice weekend

Best Rgds
Tom Yong

Sorry, something is wrong with the link. I should have checked it first.

[sah162]