Hi all. I've been a SketchUp user for years, mostly focusing on residential design and interior layouts, but I recently decided to experiment with some "overkill" hardware to see if I could speed up my workflow. I’ve ended up with a ProLiant BL460C blade server in my home lab, which packs a 12 Core 2.6GHz Xeon.
I know the common wisdom in the community is that SketchUp thrives almost exclusively on high clock speeds for modeling because the core engine is largely a single-threaded application. However, I’m curious about the rendering and plugin side of things. One specific point I'm worried about is the trade-off: whether the relatively low 2.6GHz clock speed will actually make the viewport experience miserable, even if those 12 cores manage to scream through a V-Ray or Enscape export.
In my personal experience, whenever I’m working on massive site plans with lots of high-poly foliage, my current workstation starts to chug during orbit and zoom operations. I thought offloading the heavy lifting to a dedicated server might be a clever workaround, but now I’m wondering if enterprise gear is just the wrong tool for this particular creative job. I’ve spent the last few nights trying to optimize the drivers, and while the stability is rock-solid, that snappy "instant" feeling you get with a high-frequency i7 or i9 just isn't there. It’s been an interesting experiment in seeing how server architecture handles CAD software, but it’s definitely a steep learning curve.
Has anyone else tried using enterprise Xeons for their primary rendering rigs, or are we better off sticking to high-frequency consumer CPUs for a smoother SketchUp experience? I'd love to hear if anyone has managed to find a "sweet spot" for settings with similar specs.

Hi all. I've been a SketchUp user for years, mostly focusing on residential design and interior layouts, but I recently decided to experiment with some "overkill" hardware to see if I could speed up my workflow. I’ve ended up with a ProLiant BL460C blade server in my home lab, which packs a 12 Core 2.6GHz Xeon.
I know the common wisdom in the community is that SketchUp thrives almost exclusively on high clock speeds for modeling because the core engine is largely a single-threaded application. However, I’m curious about the rendering and plugin side of things. One specific point I'm worried about is the trade-off: whether the relatively low 2.6GHz clock speed will actually make the viewport experience miserable, even if those 12 cores manage to scream through a V-Ray or Enscape export.
In my personal experience, whenever I’m working on massive site plans with lots of high-poly foliage, my current workstation starts to chug during orbit and zoom operations. I thought offloading the heavy lifting to a dedicated server might be a clever workaround, but now I’m wondering if enterprise gear is just the wrong tool for this particular creative job. I’ve spent the last few nights trying to optimize the drivers, and while the stability is rock-solid, that snappy "instant" feeling you get with a high-frequency i7 or i9 just isn't there. It’s been an interesting experiment in seeing how server architecture handles CAD software, but it’s definitely a steep learning curve.
Has anyone else tried using enterprise Xeons for their primary rendering rigs, or are we better off sticking to high-frequency consumer CPUs for a smoother SketchUp experience? I'd love to hear if anyone has managed to find a "sweet spot" for settings with similar specs.

Hi everyone, long-time lurker but first-time poster here!
I’ve been working on a pretty extensive urban planning model in SketchUp recently (lots of imported components, high-poly vegetation, you know the drill). The file size has ballooned to over 600MB, and I’m starting to experience significant lag, especially during auto-saves or when reloading components.
I recently upgraded my workstation to try and combat this. I’m running a decent CPU and GPU, but my storage setup is a bit unique. I repurposed an older enterprise workstation, so I’m running my drives through an HBA & Controllers SAS Controller Smart Array setup rather than direct NVMe on the motherboard. It’s great for redundancy and massive storage capacity for my texture libraries, but I’m wondering if the seek times or throughput on this older controller architecture might be creating a bottleneck for SketchUp’s specific way of handling temp files and caching.
Has anyone else here tried running heavy SketchUp models off of enterprise-grade storage controllers? I’ve noticed the lag is worst when the "Saving..." progress bar pops up. Is SketchUp particularly sensitive to storage latency compared to raw throughput? I’m debating whether I should just move my active project files to a simple local SSD to see if that helps, or if I’m just hitting the polygon ceiling of the software itself.
Any insights on optimizing storage specifically for large SketchUp files would be super appreciated!