sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. gealagie
    3. Posts
    Oops, your profile's looking a bit empty! To help us tailor your experience, please fill in key details like your SketchUp version, skill level, operating system, and more. Update and save your info on your profile page today!
    πŸ”Œ Smart Spline | Fluid way to handle splines for furniture design and complex structures. Download
    G
    Offline
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 5
    • Posts 65
    • Groups 1

    Posts

    Recent Best Controversial
    • RE: A Welcome Message to New SketchUcation Members

      Sorry James--see the thread you just created for me.

      posted in Newbie Forum
      G
      gealagie
    • RE: Create solid-appearing 3d models of a subsurface

      Woops I meant to reply here, James.

      posted in SketchUp Discussions
      G
      gealagie
    • RE: A Welcome Message to New SketchUcation Members

      How about you, James. I'm talking about importing multiple tessellated surfaces into SU and using Intersect/Model, then clipping away the excess. Imagine creating a cube of non-coplanar sides this way. In your experience with this forum has this been discussed before?

      posted in Newbie Forum
      G
      gealagie
    • Create solid-appearing 3d models of a subsurface

      Hello everyone. I'm testing/trying out Sketchup Pro to see if it's right for our company's needs. We are in the upstream oil and gas industry--we wish to create solid-appearing 3d models of the subsurface. Primarily that means models of underground geological structure (= the way strata undulate and are faulted). For the most part these surfaces (the tops of a rock strata layer or a vertical fault) will all be non-coplanar. You have probably already guessed the more horizontal (layer) surfaces are not at all unlike topographic surfaces--just underground. These can't really be drawn freehand--they need to be the actual x-y-z surfaces we have interpreted from 3d seismic data. I can export these geologic surfaces from my interpretation/exploration software as flat ascii x-y-z data files and modify to hopefully be imported into Sketchup. From what I can see so far, the .dem file format might be the best bet, but (I hope) many of you know of other ways as well. Right now I don't even have a proper sample .dem text file to look at for comparison. Can you guys point me to similar discussions of this within your forum and/or give me advice.

      posted in SketchUp Discussions sketchup
      G
      gealagie
    • RE: A Welcome Message to New SketchUcation Members

      Hello everyone. I'm testing/trying out Sketchup Pro to see if it's right for our company's needs. We are in the upstream oil and gas industry--we wish to create solid-appearing 3d models of the subsurface. Primarily that means models of underground geological structure (= the way strata undulate and are faulted). For the most part these surfaces (the tops of a rock strata layer or a vertical fault) will all be non-coplanar. You have probably already guessed the more horizontal (layer) surfaces are not at all unlike topographic surfaces--just underground. These can't really be drawn freehand--they need to be the actual x-y-z surfaces we have interpreted from 3d seismic data. I can export these geologic surfaces from my interpretation/exploration software as flat ascii x-y-z data files and modify to hopefully be imported into Sketchup. From what I can see so far, the .dem file format might be the best bet, but (I hope) many of you know of other ways as well. Right now I don't even have a proper sample .dem text file to look at for comparison. Can you guys point me to similar discussions of this within your forum and/or give me advice. I'd be happy if the moderator should decide to start a new thread with this too. Thanks!

      posted in Newbie Forum
      G
      gealagie
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 4 / 4