Rayscaper New Releases

[Krass]

here is a render 1024 Spp in 1080 p.
If other users could take a look—I find it a bit sluggish.

[Krass]

If other users could take a look—I find it a bit sluggish. :
https://jskup.fr/wp-content/uploads/2026/11/testnet.png

[pixelcruncher]

@Krass I like the render! What do you mean by sluggish? The performance of Rayscaper or something about the render?

[Krass]

I mean not sharp enough.
But I offen render in 2 or 4k... may be that's the point?

[Krass]

Yes, 4K is much better—it’s truly the ideal solution when combined with the denoiser, as even after just 2 minutes, you get a much sharper image that’s close to the final result. It does take longer, of course, but you can also choose to stop the render after 5 minutes, by which point you already have an excellent preview image.

[Krass]

4k render reduced to 1080 p. Suits me

[Alattab]

any thing new

[Alattab]

This post is deleted!

[Krass]

Thanks! This extension looks quite comprehensive. But I still think you should have created a new thread for this extension rather than in this post dedicated to Rayscaper. From the beginning of your posts, I haven't found you very encouraging regarding the enormous amount of work done by Pixel Cruncher. What do you think?

[Alattab]

@Krass Okay, I’m sorry; I didn’t mean that. All I meant was to clarify the automatic material recognition feature.

[pixelcruncher]

No worries, folks, I appreciate suggestions and the love for Rayscaper! I've been working on a feature like this for a while, but I never finished it. I will launch it soon. But yes, Rayscaper will try to be smart about material names and will have user-configurable rules for matching them. I'm trying to make it so it doesn't get in your way; if you don't like it, you don't have to use it.