Rayscaper New Releases
-
@krass Very cool render, I forgive you for the kitsch
I changed the denoising; it kicks in a bit earlier, so maybe that's why the render looks blurry? Do you prefer a noisy first render over a blurry one?
Cheers,
Thomas -
tu avais déjà fait cette modification du débruiteur auparavant je crois.
je ne sais pas, mais je me rappelle aussi qu'il y a des paramètres de filtres de pixels..
mais je vais continuer les tests voir si c'est pas plutĂ´t du ressort de l'opticien...
-
The pixel filter and the denoiser are two different things. The pixel filter sets how much each sample spreads over the pixels around it, so it decides how sharp the image is, whether or not it's denoised. The denoiser only cleans up the noise, and it's the part I changed, not the pixel filter.
Cheers,
Thomas -
here is a render 1024 Spp in 1080 p.
If other users could take a look—I find it a bit sluggish. -
If other users could take a look—I find it a bit sluggish. :
https://jskup.fr/wp-content/uploads/2026/11/testnet.png -
@Krass I like the render! What do you mean by sluggish? The performance of Rayscaper or something about the render?
-
I mean not sharp enough.
But I offen render in 2 or 4k... may be that's the point? -
Yes, 4K is much better—it’s truly the ideal solution when combined with the denoiser, as even after just 2 minutes, you get a much sharper image that’s close to the final result. It does take longer, of course, but you can also choose to stop the render after 5 minutes, by which point you already have an excellent preview image.
-
4k render reduced to 1080 p. Suits me
-
any thing new
-
This post is deleted! -
Thanks! This extension looks quite comprehensive. But I still think you should have created a new thread for this extension rather than in this post dedicated to Rayscaper. From the beginning of your posts, I haven't found you very encouraging regarding the enormous amount of work done by Pixel Cruncher. What do you think?
-
@Krass Okay, I’m sorry; I didn’t mean that. All I meant was to clarify the automatic material recognition feature.
-
No worries, folks, I appreciate suggestions and the love for Rayscaper! I've been working on a feature like this for a while, but I never finished it. I will launch it soon. But yes, Rayscaper will try to be smart about material names and will have user-configurable rules for matching them. I'm trying to make it so it doesn't get in your way; if you don't like it, you don't have to use it.
I'm the developer of Rayscaper: https://rayscaper.com/ - Fast and easy rendering for SketchUp.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better đź’—
Register Login
Advertisement