Rayscaper New Releases
-
what about decal
-
-
This is truly excellent—thanks for adding this option so quickly!
I’ve just posted a new message in the Rayscaper section of the French forum Biblio 3D to mark the release of version 1.0.0, including a summary of all the available features:
[ RAYSCAPER ] Rayscaper 1.0.0
Rayscaper pour Sketchup version finale vient de sortir, fini les beta. Disponible aussi pour Mac Le programme est désormais complet qui pend en charge toutes le
www.biblio3d.com (www.biblio3d.com)
I’ve created this initial render; please forgive me for not being able to resist the kitschiness of this sofa...
-
However, this first render is slightly blurry; I hadn’t touched any of the settings... Could it be related to the heavy demands that the "Fur" places on my graphics card? I’m not sure—perhaps I accidentally moved a slider somewhere...
-
@krass Very cool render, I forgive you for the kitsch
I changed the denoising; it kicks in a bit earlier, so maybe that's why the render looks blurry? Do you prefer a noisy first render over a blurry one?
Cheers,
Thomas -
tu avais déjà fait cette modification du débruiteur auparavant je crois.
je ne sais pas, mais je me rappelle aussi qu'il y a des paramètres de filtres de pixels..
mais je vais continuer les tests voir si c'est pas plutôt du ressort de l'opticien...
-
The pixel filter and the denoiser are two different things. The pixel filter sets how much each sample spreads over the pixels around it, so it decides how sharp the image is, whether or not it's denoised. The denoiser only cleans up the noise, and it's the part I changed, not the pixel filter.
Cheers,
Thomas -
here is a render 1024 Spp in 1080 p.
If other users could take a look—I find it a bit sluggish. -
If other users could take a look—I find it a bit sluggish. :
https://jskup.fr/wp-content/uploads/2026/11/testnet.png -
@Krass I like the render! What do you mean by sluggish? The performance of Rayscaper or something about the render?
-
I mean not sharp enough.
But I offen render in 2 or 4k... may be that's the point? -
Yes, 4K is much better—it’s truly the ideal solution when combined with the denoiser, as even after just 2 minutes, you get a much sharper image that’s close to the final result. It does take longer, of course, but you can also choose to stop the render after 5 minutes, by which point you already have an excellent preview image.
-
4k render reduced to 1080 p. Suits me
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login
Advertisement