Help with window hole in wall script

Deanby7

Thanks for suggestions. I have used TIG's holepunch tool and it is very good (complicated code!) but I wanted a script which would pushpull from both sides to retain materials applied to both sides of the wall, ie brick on the outer and a colour on the inside for instance. Doing it this way, populates the reveals with the corresponding material.
I've also looked at the technique you suggested in url. This assumes you know the wall thickness and construct the reveals on your window components. The window components need to be modified for different wall constructions. Not what I want to do.
With sdmitch and TIG's help, my script is working ok for my needs. Just need to sort out the user changeable variables to be persistent between script uses now!!
Thanks anyway.

Deanby7

TIGs thanks for very useful detailed information regarding variables etc. I thought I would try the simple solution of using instance variables as I only want the values to persist within the current session and model. If I've read your explanation correctly. Not sure I have as this script works on the first run through but on the second run of the script I get an error ......
Error: #<ArgumentError: comparison of Length with nil failed>

module DeanBy7
	module Window_Opening
		def self.main
		    if @olt==nil; @olt = 103.mm; end
			if @twt==nil; @twt = 315.mm; end
			if @wfd==nil; @wfd = 70.mm; end
			if @wdi==nil; @wdi = 50.mm; end
			
			mod = Sketchup.active_model
			sel = mod.selection
			unless sel.grep(Sketchup;;ComponentInstance).empty?
				prompts = ["Wall external leaf thickness", "Wall total thickness", "Window Frame Depth", "Window inset"]
				results = UI.inputbox prompts, [@olt,@twt,@wfd,@wdi], "db Window Opening"
				if results
					@olt,@twt,@wfd,@wdi = results; mod.start_operation "db Window Opening"
					sel.grep(Sketchup;;ComponentInstance){|cdi|
						trn = cdi.transformation
						org = cdi.transformation.origin
						wid = cdi.definition.bounds.width
						hgt = [cdi.definition.bounds.depth,cdi.definition.bounds.height].max
						fog = cdi.glued_to
						if fog!=nil
						    if fog.is_a?(Sketchup;;Face)
							    p0 = org; ents = mod.active_entities
							    xa,ya,za = fog.normal.axes
						    elsif fog.is_a?(Sketchup;;Group)
							    gt = fog.transformation;ents = fog.entities
							    p0 = org.transform(gt.inverse)
							    gf = ents.grep(Sketchup;;Face).find{|f|f.classify_point(p0)==1}
							    xa,ya,za = gf.normal.axes
						    end
							
						    cdi.glued_to = nil
						
						    p1 = p0.offset(xa,wid) 
						    p2 = p1.offset(ya,-hgt)
						    p3 = p0.offset(ya,-hgt)
						    cut = ents.add_face(p0,p1,p2,p3)
						    cut.pushpull(-@olt)
						
						    p0.offset!(za,-@twt)
						    p1 = p0.offset(xa,wid)
						    p2 = p1.offset(ya,-hgt)
						    p3 = p0.offset(ya,-hgt)
						    cut = ents.add_face(p0,p1,p2,p3)
						    cut.pushpull(@olt-@twt)
						
						    vect = cdi.transformation.zaxis.reverse
                            vect.length = @wfd+@wdi
						    cdi.transform!(vect)
                        else
                            UI.messagebox "Component not Glued!", MB_OK					  
                        end
					}
					mod.commit_operation
				end
			end
		end
	end
end

unless file_loaded?(__FILE__)
	UI.menu("Plugins").add_item("db Window Opening") { DeanBy7;;Window_Opening.main }
	file_loaded(__FILE__)
end

Ruby is obviously "picky" about nil and lengths, unlike AutoLisp!
Or have I done something stupid?

TIG

Where you have code like:
if @olt==nil;...
change to:
unless @olt;...
So IF @olt exists we do nothing, if not we set it up...

You could also recast the whole line from:
if @olt==nil; @olt = 103.mm; end
to
@olt = 103.mm unless @olt
which I think reads better...

Fix all such tests...
[I think there are 5 ?]

Garry K

Since we are now discussing stylistic issues

Personally I like

@olt = 103.mm if (! @olt)

I generally use parentheses for if statements and for methods even though ruby does not require them. This helps me with speed reading code as you can immediately distinguish a mehod from a var

Aslo I prefer ! instead of not
and I prefer || instead of or
This is because of my C / C++ background

I use single quotes ' for simple strings (slightly faster)
'my simple string'

I use double quotes " when strings include escape characters or variable replacements
"my variable#{variable} \n with a newline"

Deanby7

Me again!!
Trying to group the reveal entities to make it easy to move a window and it opening if I need to. I have managed to create the group but it ends up being transformed and its not inside the wall groupd as expected. I also get a copy of the elements (not grouped but within the wall group transformed to the wall group origin. Also get a BugSplat! Anyone have an idea what I've done wrong?

module DeanBy7
	module Window_Opening
		def self.main
		    @olt = 103.mm if(!@olt)
			@twt = 315.mm if(!@twt)
			@wfd = 70.mm if(!@wfd)
			@wdi = 50.mm if(!@wdi)
			
			mod = Sketchup.active_model
			sel = mod.selection
			unless sel.grep(Sketchup;;ComponentInstance).empty?
				prompts = ["Wall external leaf thickness", "Wall total thickness", "Window Frame Depth", "Window inset"]
				results = UI.inputbox prompts, [@olt,@twt,@wfd,@wdi], "db Window Opening"
				if results
					@olt,@twt,@wfd,@wdi = results; mod.start_operation "db Window Opening"
					sel.grep(Sketchup;;ComponentInstance){|cdi|
						trn = cdi.transformation
						org = cdi.transformation.origin
						wid = cdi.definition.bounds.width
						hgt = [cdi.definition.bounds.depth,cdi.definition.bounds.height].max
						fog = cdi.glued_to
						if fog!=nil
						    if fog.is_a?(Sketchup;;Face)
							    p0 = org; ents = mod.active_entities
							    xa,ya,za = fog.normal.axes
						    elsif fog.is_a?(Sketchup;;Group)
							    gt = fog.transformation;ents = fog.entities
							    p0 = org.transform(gt.inverse)
							    gf = ents.grep(Sketchup;;Face).find{|f|f.classify_point(p0)==1}
							    xa,ya,za = gf.normal.axes
						    end
							
						    cdi.glued_to = nil
						
						    p1 = p0.offset(xa,wid) 
						    p2 = p1.offset(ya,-hgt)
						    p3 = p0.offset(ya,-hgt)
						    cut = ents.add_face(p0,p1,p2,p3)
						    cut.pushpull(-@olt)
						
						    p0.offset!(za,-@twt)
						    p1 = p0.offset(xa,wid)
						    p2 = p1.offset(ya,-hgt)
						    p3 = p0.offset(ya,-hgt)
						    cut = ents.add_face(p0,p1,p2,p3)
						    cut.pushpull(@olt-@twt)
							
							q0 = p0.offset(za, @twt - @olt)
							q2 = p2.offset(za, @twt - @olt)
							
							rev_faces = []
							ents.each {|e|
                            if e.is_a? Sketchup;;Face
                                clp = e.classify_point q0
	                            if clp == 2
	                                rev_faces << e
					            end
                            end
                            }
							ents.each {|e|
                            if e.is_a? Sketchup;;Face
                                clp = e.classify_point q2
	                            if clp == 2
	                                rev_faces << e
					            end
                            end
                            }
							
						    rev_grp = fog.entities.add_group rev_faces
							rev_grp.name = "Reveals"
							
						    vect = cdi.transformation.zaxis.reverse
                            vect.length = @wfd+@wdi
						    cdi.transform!(vect)
                        else
                            UI.messagebox "Component not Glued!", MB_OK					  
                        end
					}
					mod.commit_operation
				end
			end
		end
	end
end

unless file_loaded?("dbwindowwallopen")
	UI.menu("Plugins").add_item("db Window Opening") { DeanBy7;;Window_Opening.main }
	file_loaded("dbwindowwallopen")
end

I'm learning through a lot of mistakes!!!

TIG

Doon't know the exact issue...
BUT I see this...
Once you have made a face [cut] and used it to PushPull you can't reuse it.
The PushPull destroys it.
Recreate it where you expect it to be and then redo the PushPull...
I think you do this...

Stop your script by adding a 'return' after some operation.
Then you can work out where it fails...

Deanby7

Here is an image of my test wall opening!

After the pushpull operation, I've tested the face entities to see if they connect with 2 vertices i've offset into the middle of the reveals (diagonally opposite corners of opening). These faces then reside in rev_faces. I'm trying to create a reveal group within the wall group.

TIG

You can't use entities.add_group(somethings) UNLESS the entities==model.active_entities !!!

So you need to create an empty group, then add new 'cloned' entities into that...
rev_grp = fog.entities.add_group() rev_faces.each{|face| rev_grp.entities.add_face(face.outer_loop.vertices) }

This is totally untested !
But you get the idea...
Make an empty group and add faces into it by 'cloning'.
Also remember to erase any redundant faces in the original context.

It might be best to do this operation inside a group, initially clone face, material etc, then do the pushpull ? ... ?

JQL

@deanby7 said:

Trying to group the reveal entities to make it easy to move a window and it opening if I need to.

Here comes the outsider (growing an interest in your plugin)... That's a nice idea!

Deanby7

It's the faces produced by the pushpull operations (the reveal faces "rev_faces") that I want to group together. Can this be done?

Garry K

I would probably not use pushpull in that case. First Make the cutouts in the opposing wall faces. Then create the frame group and create the rest of the geometry inside the new group.

Deanby7

By using the pushpull, the reveals inherit the materials of the main wall faces. In the case of the outer face the reveal brickwork pattern is maintained round the corner, which is good! However, it appears that moving geometry with Ruby is a no-no. Therefore if I want to group the reveal geometry for later ease of movement of window etc then I will have to create it as you say within a group. But I will have to add the material and probably align the texture to suit. It's a trade off I think! Unless anyone has a solution!! Here's hoping

Garry K

pushpull doesn't align the texture completely. The sides are close. But the top and bottom are not.

Notice the panel raised door through the window opening. It was created with a ruby script with 1 texture.

Parts were created vertically and then moved and rotated into position.

pushpull wall.png

Deanby7

I take your point. The sides of the reveal are good enough. The bottom is usually covered by a window cill, and the top reveal could be adjusted if needed but could be adjusted but is not as visible as the sides in views of a building. Your door looks good. Was it created with your own plugin? I'd like to play with that! I have a quick and dirty window builder which I created as my first Ruby project. The code is nor pretty, but it works!!

Garry K

All my plugins have a 7 or 14 day free trial.

I have 2 versions of door maker - same code base. Pro makes doors for cabinets and furniture. Gold adds more features including Passage Doors, Bifolds and Entry doors. There are built in features such as pivot hinges for large heavy doors.
http://sketchucation.com/pluginstore?pln=gkware_doormaker

I have been asked to build a window maker along the same lines as door maker.

I also have stair maker for curved stairs and spirals.
http://sketchucation.com/pluginstore?pln=gkware_stairmaker

And I've put quite a bit of work into CabMaker which creates kitchen cabinets, vanities and various types of furniture.
http://sketchucation.com/pluginstore?pln=gkware_cabmaker

I am also currently working on a Wall Maker that works a bit like Chief Architect

Garry K

Here's the entry door with side lites and astragal.

wall maker.png

Here's a bit of the wall maker. You can turn on / off the dimension layer. You can edit the length of the wall by double clicking on the dimension text. Change it and the wall changes length. The tool tip shows the length of the wall. You can straight type and let the VCB make the change to length, or provide length and height with a comma between the values (semi colon for users that have their decimal indicator as a comma). There is a button to toggle between top view orthographic and perspective. The wall being created is in ortho.

Walls have a category and a name which corresponds to a file with inside material, outside material, height and wall width. Users can create their own wall specifications.

I just started this plugin a week ago.

edit wall.png

Deanby7

Gary K - They look interesting, I will check these out!
With TIG and sdmitch's very informative help I have succeeded with my little script!
Posted here for information. Cheers guys.
Now to look at automating the move of window component with its associated reveals! Hmmm observers?

dbwindowwallopen.rb