Grumman G-44 Widgeon
-
@chedda said:
Looks good but i think it needs motion blur propellors.
I agree.
Working out how to best do those. I have some ideas. -
@andyc said:
Lovely model. Compositionally I'd go for a lower camera angle (I think your background plate could just about sustain this), and would tilt the aircraft slightly off horizontal, to make it feel a bit more dynamic. Great work
A
Excellent suggestion.
-
Suggested composition change. Tweaked lighting. Props coming next.
-
Looks good. My only thought is that I'd tilt the nose of the plane up just a touch more. See how at the moment the wings and horizontal tail-planes seem to touch? Tilt the nose up a bit and you'll get a bit of blue sky between them, and the model will "read" better. Hope that makes sense. Such a great, clean model!
A.
-
@andyc said:
Looks good. My only thought is that I'd tilt the nose of the plane up just a touch more. See how at the moment the wings and horizontal tail-planes seem to touch? Tilt the nose up a bit and you'll get a bit of blue sky between them, and the model will "read" better. Hope that makes sense. Such a great, clean model!
A.
Good suggestion. I agree. Will do that.
Thanks!
-
@andyc said:
My only thought is that I'd tilt the nose of the plane up just a touch more.
A.
By golly you're right! Looks much better now
-
-
Some minor fixes.
-
Final.
-
Hey Brian these textures might be handy
Also this HDRI http://macmave.blogspot.de/2012/09/free-over-clouds-hdri-map.html
The sky works fine check it out !
-
Thanks Simon! Both downloaded.
-
Sorry there have been no updates. My day job has been very busy this month.
Advertisement