SketchUp 2015 Wishlist

TK0001

Ability to "fade" layers just like they seem to when you are editing a component / group but seeing the rest of the model. This is a great way to emphasize elements - lets say a run of pipe - through a cluttered background. This would need to be tied to scene generation just like whether a layer is on/off. It could be "fade all other groups/components" and / or "fade all other layers" for my money... And of course this functionality would follow through into layout.

@tk0001 said:

I would like layer transparency and to have it save-able in Scene Manager, so you could "ghost out" non-essential information in a certain scene, and "highlight" the things you want to stand out. Essentially, creating a scene that looks like when you double-click on a group or component within a larger model.

Great minds...

bsfranza

flickerfree opacity/alphas ... when working with several alpha mapped trees and stuff things get ugly

would be awesome if this could somehow get fixed!!!

torofacito

it would be good that door and window components cut to the wall precisely for a given thickness.

BIM plugins should be integrated in it

TANER TAN

Must be high resolution icons in the new version of Sketchup.
Hopefully, this time they do.

atelierpaar

My biggest SU - wishes are still :
[b]1. Speed

[b]2. true geometry of circles and curves
I understood - I am inside a box-program but I do not see the point not to progress.
It would make life so much easier to work with true circles/continues curves and to produce geometrical correct intersections.

STL-file export
After spending countless hours on a flawless SU 8-model, I learned from several 3d printing-shops, that the model could not be printed.
Apparently SU 8 produces a countless errors at the intersection of curved Volumes.
If The future really is 3d printing, its absolutely necessary to improve on curve-geometry and file-export .

erwinmeulman

Multi-threaded kernel COLLADA, as parasolid

pbacot

A couple of things.

Give the control of visible toolbars to users. Many plugins are written to leave the toolbar in the workspace, when opening Sketchup, whether you had them open last session or not. That is you can't keep them closed.
Fix the extensions window in Preferences: So when you are tired of a set of toolbars opening up you go to the extensions window to turn the extension off. The extension window has a tiny scroll window that lists (some, not all) plugins. One must scroll up and down, searching for the right extension because THERE IS NO ORDER OR SEARCH FUNCTION. Make this list contain all plugins and make the window expandable, and please list alphanumerically like the rest of the world.

Box

I think you'll find that is an issue with the relevant plugins not SU.
Have you used the plugin and extension managers that are part of the Sketchucation plugin.

pbacot

@box said:

I think you'll find that is an issue with the relevant plugins not SU.

Have you used the plugin and extension managers that are part of the Sketchucation plugin.

So make it a SU issue. Why does Trimble leave the UI issues up to misc. plugin authors? SU has the worse UI setup of any app. I regularly use.
No. Sketchucation Store plugin? So you would use it to unload extensions that you have in the plugins folder?

utiler

@taner tan said:

Must be high resolution icons in the new version of SketchUp.
Hopefully, this time they do.

Gee, you're easily pleased.....

Box

Pbacot I'm not sure how Trimble can control a 3rd party plugin. Your original point was about plugins that are persistent on restart. This is because the code is written incorrectly causing the toolbar to open no matter what it's previous state was. So it's a fault in the plugin, not Sketchup. If you find a plugin that is doing it you should point it out to it's author.

As for Sketchucation tools, Yes you can turn plugins and extensions on and off, you can even create different set of plugins that you want to load together, you can uninstall plugins, update, auto install, load temporarily or permanently, you can use bundles to sync different computer so they have the same plugins, or create a specific bundle that you will only use on your laptop and auto load all of them with one click........I could go on and on but there are too many things it can do and more coming.

pbacot

Thanks! I'll look at the SCF tools. However can't the developers of SU control/prohibit a particular action of a plugin? Isn't it the function of SU that allows the plugin toolbar to show in the first place?

And, of course, I think you realize, that although I can add managers and plugins to improve my use of SU (and I am glad of suggestions), it doesn't change a wish that the application were better out of the box, if only for the new user who doesn't have the plugins to solve their frustrations. I mostly find the extensions window a pain because it is SO poorly designed and is never improved, not that I haven't learned to live with it.

ArtPen

Have been working in sketchUP on a couple of complex architectural and landscape project just now and thought it will be worse to update a wish list.

GENERAL

1A. Xref or other proper Reference system with Project folder setup.
So you can see all References in the Master model and been able to open them start from the master model make changes in separate file,
then save and update the master model

1B. Some kind of team work please

X64 for big complex project
Texture folder. Each SketchUp file will have a separate Texture folder inside a project folder. To keep all organise.
Faster Viewport using modern OpenGL technologies. Nice representation , colours , anti-aliasing , soft shadows, nicer fog and light.
Groups for Layers
High Quality Google Maps with option to grab bigger locations
X64 and FASTER Layout
I think it is time to introduce wall, slab, window/door, curtain wall, elements
Components to be able to cut through walls ( two faces )
Better lines and curves. Able to see centre point of each curve. Able to see tangent points.
Line types (without using plugin)

OSX

Material list
Show total area of material in a model by right click on the material inside the material browser. Yo can do it on Windows
Better UI
Full screen

Just wanted to ask is there any official way to submit our wish lists to Trimble directly? Of cause they work hard to deliver better program but they quite close from the community.
Updates are very rear. No information is given unfortunately .

Cheers

pbacot

ArtPen. Nice list.

On the XREF idea (it would be great if this were handled to save MB's), I have method that is similar, if you haven't tried it. I often use a component for a whole building, especially accessory buildings in site. I get the footprint laid out then I save the component (contextual menu) as SU file. I then do my work on the building in that file. I can "reload" (contextual menu) anytime into the main site file. It usually comes right in exactly where the old version was (occasionally I do something to throw it off, but it's easily fixed). You can make a file for the structure/ shell of the building that is used both in the site model, for exteriors, and in another model that has only interior elements for that building--so you are not compiling large models with useless geometry.

Anton_S

Very nice list, ArtPen. It just summarizes everything that SU has to have.

Krisidious

I want it all... and I want it now!

Youtube Video

KrisM

"- Stop the Esc key from quitting dialogs!!!!!!"
Yes, yes, yes !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ArtPen

Pbacot thanks for the tip. I should try it.

Another though: Why not put SketchUP on App Store for Mac users?

jeff hammond

@artpen said:

Have been working in sketchUP on a couple of complex architectural and landscape project just now and thought it will be worse to update a wish list.

GENERAL

1A. Xref or other proper Reference system with Project folder setup.
So you can see all References in the Master model and been able to open them start from the master model make changes in separate file,
then save and update the master model

1B. Some kind of team work please

X64 for big complex project

Texture folder. Each SketchUp file will have a separate Texture folder inside a project folder. To keep all organise.

Faster Viewport using modern OpenGL technologies. Nice representation , colours , anti-aliasing , soft shadows, nicer fog and light.

Groups for Layers

High Quality Google Maps with option to grab bigger locations

X64 and FASTER Layout

I think it is time to introduce wall, slab, window/door, curtain wall, elements

Components to be able to cut through walls ( two faces )

Better lines and curves. Able to see centre point of each curve. Able to see tangent points.

Line types (without using plugin)

Cheers

good list artpen..

i disagree with #3 though.. i'd way rather have the textures stored in the .skp (as they are now).. otherwise, for every .skp i have, i'd also have a texture folder? sounds harder to organize.. not easier (for me at least)

#8.. hmm.. what are you imagining for that? a library of components? parametric components?
i'm not clear on what you're saying.

@unknownuser said:

Just wanted to ask is there any official way to submit our wish lists to Trimble directly? Of cause they work hard to deliver better program but they quite close from the community.

people from the sketchup team read these forums from time to time but they generally won't engage in a thread like this.
trimble has a discourse though:
http://forums.sketchup.com

there's a 'feature request' category available.

@unknownuser said:

Updates are very rear. No information is given unfortunately .

well, they do yearly updates these days so those long waiting periods seem to be over now.. but yeah, i don't think i can recall someone from the team saying "expect this in the next release" (or whatever).. that's just how they are.

driven

@artpen said:

Another though: Why not put SketchUP on App Store for Mac users?

1: it would need to be more expensive than the Windows version and negate all the approved resellers...

2: it may have to remove the ability to add Plugins, to comply with the App Store guidelines...

I don't think we want either of those.

john