sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    ℹ️ Licensed Extensions | FredoBatch, ElevationProfile, FredoSketch, LayOps, MatSim and Pic2Shape will require license from Sept 1st More Info

    Aparently not a solid form?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Newbie Forum
    sketchup
    46 Posts 7 Posters 1.4k Views 7 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • BoxB Offline
      Box
      last edited by

      I just noticed the reason you can't see a damn thing in maya, as you put it, might be because in the file you posted earlier the calipers are 28m from the origin, so when you open it it is probably tiny and way off to the side somewhere.

      Always model close to the global origin.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Dave RD Offline
        Dave R
        last edited by

        It's likely that the model wound up 28m from the origin due to scaling up to work on tiny geometry and back down again. If you do that using the Scale tool, use the same handle for both scaling up and back down. As I wrote about in an earlier post, I leave the original component where it sits and scale up a copy. Once finished editing the enlarged copy, I get out of edit mode and delete the big one. This leaves the original small component in place near the origin with all of the editing done.

        An alternative method of scaling up and back down is via the Tape Measure tool. Measure a known length making sure to click at each end. Type a new, larger length and hit Enter. When you are ready to scale back down, measure the same distance and type the correct distance. Hit Enter. The model will get scaled up and back down maintaining the same position relative to the axes. and origin.

        Etaoin Shrdlu

        %

        (THERE'S NO PLACE LIKE)

        G28 X0.0 Y0.0 Z0.0

        M30

        %

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • P Offline
          Polynechramorph
          last edited by

          I keep getting an error from the IGS viewer and it freezes up but only when I try to open this one file. If I make a simple shape and export it to the viewer it works fine (thanks for that tip πŸ˜„ ).
          Here is a copy of my .skp file which doesn't seem to want to export properly. I'm at my wits end 😞
          The model had been moved back to the planar center several days ago when I was made aware of the scaling mistake I had made.
          Any help would be very appreciated.

          I suspect something has gone wrong with the surface of the main calliper piece as is exhibits strange characteristics when I try to alter it in any way.

          I tried making engraved (extruded) lines on the surface but this just caused a whole mess of errors that when auto-corrected always resulted in the top surface being deleted and the ends of the tiny engraved "ditches" to be deleted as well. Very strange. The simple pattern I've now successfully placed on the surface was very tedious. The lines kept drawing not directly on the surface so that I had to draw almost all of them individually. Copying sections of them produced thousands of tiny mistakes in the solid inspector.

          Thanks for any help.


          1ccallipersScale1a3.skp

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • gillesG Offline
            gilles
            last edited by

            Please, post the model in V8.

            " c'est curieux chez les marins ce besoin de faire des phrases "

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • P Offline
              Polynechramorph
              last edited by

              And here in V8


              1ccallipersScale1a31.skp

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Dave RD Offline
                Dave R
                last edited by

                I wonder if the scaling has caused you some issues. The definitions of the components are at different scales. In your V13 as I downloaded it, the main bar component measures 17800mm long overall. It is scaled up from the original size. Component #2 is also scaled up from its original size. Their component definitions were created when those components were correctly sized. The other four component definitions were created at this scaled up size. Perhaps the IGS file shows the components at their definition-defined sizes?

                The fix at this stage would be to correct the scale of the entire model--scale back down to life size--then explode the four components that need their definitions corrected and make new components of them.

                This scale thing is another reason I use the process I've described when working on small components. It avoids this problem altogether.

                Etaoin Shrdlu

                %

                (THERE'S NO PLACE LIKE)

                G28 X0.0 Y0.0 Z0.0

                M30

                %

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • P Offline
                  Polynechramorph
                  last edited by

                  Thank you all very much for all your help! I've manged to create a file that I can export and use and am now with a very much altered design in the prototyping stage.
                  This thread can be closed now.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • A Offline
                    afnanfahmi
                    last edited by

                    hi, can u guys check my model, mine also does not contain solid elements, it said something wrong with the surface border, hope anyone could repair it for me


                    WL Wax.skp

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • TIGT Offline
                      TIG Moderator
                      last edited by

                      You have some convoluted intersecting edges/faces at one internal corner.
                      I found that deleting the geometry relating to it and the two 'spikes', then adding one new edge back in made it a solid...
                      It's easier if you use Monochrome mode and un-smooth all of the edges...


                      Capture.PNG


                      Capture1.PNG

                      TIG

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • A Offline
                        afnanfahmi
                        last edited by

                        thanks man, thanks for the monochrome tips too

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • 1
                        • 2
                        • 3
                        • 3 / 3
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Buy SketchPlus
                        Buy SUbD
                        Buy WrapR
                        Buy eBook
                        Buy Modelur
                        Buy Vertex Tools
                        Buy SketchCuisine
                        Buy FormFonts

                        Advertisement