sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    Oops, your profile's looking a bit empty! To help us tailor your experience, please fill in key details like your SketchUp version, skill level, operating system, and more. Update and save your info on your profile page today!
    ⚠️ Important | Libfredo 15.6b introduces important bugfixes for Fredo's Extensions Update

    [REQ] Paneling tools for SU

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved SketchUp Discussions
    sketchup
    13 Posts 4 Posters 3.1k Views 4 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • pilouP Offline
      pilou
      last edited by

      And see also all this thread 😉

      Frenchy Pilou
      Is beautiful that please without concept!
      My Little site :)

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • H Offline
        harnstein
        last edited by

        Hi Pilou,

        the problem then would be that you'd be left with as many unique components as you had faces.

        I meant if it would be possible (somehow) to make changes to a group of components eg. twisting
        but keeping their "base information" of one copied component intact?

        Like if you have a component which you can scale but still is the same as the unscaled original one..

        -edit- The goal would be that you can draw a shape and "fill" faces with one component. And if you make changes to the component all components in the whole shape change accordingly.

        Even if it would only work on a base of a eg. four sides only component which is placed on a four sided face according to it's edges / vertices would be great

        still sketchin'

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • H Offline
          harnstein
          last edited by

          @unknownuser said:

          And see also all this thread 😉

          I did (a couple times 😉 )- and downloaded the ceiling grid ruby as well to see if i maybe have misunderstood sth..

          Hm, but i don't know how this should be doing the job.

          My post was written while you did post this link btw, therefor my post was an answer to yours before.

          Another image to make it a little clearer:

          paneling2.jpg

          If i did it the way you proposed..

          @harnstein said:

          the problem then would be that you'd be left with as many unique components as you had faces.

          ..or am i wrong?

          still sketchin'

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • mitcorbM Offline
            mitcorb
            last edited by

            The warping you are hoping to achieve may be available in TGI3d

            I take the slow, deliberate approach in my aimless wandering.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • H Offline
              harnstein
              last edited by

              Exactly!

              That's the point, too bad it's there and not here 😉

              It's this feature, the warper object with a group of components.

              Maybe it's time for investing some money.. 😉

              At least when i need it it's good to know that is there.

              still sketchin'

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • mitcorbM Offline
                mitcorb
                last edited by

                Hi, harnstein:
                I do not own, nor have I tried tgi3d. Perhaps shame on me. But if you earn money for groceries daily by using Sketchup and or any 3rd party tools, I believe you can justify this by amortizing your expense. A tool like this, it seems, pays for itself instantly, if not in the next 10 commissions you may get. What is out there in the next higher price point category?
                As for Sketchup, I wish most of what is on the wishlist for "Uber" Sketchup. An application that does it all on the fly and as many megabytes as I please, all for the nice neat price of ~$500.

                I take the slow, deliberate approach in my aimless wandering.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • H Offline
                  harnstein
                  last edited by

                  I downloaded the training edition on tgi3d amorph, it's quite limited in vertices but that's ok.

                  After the first yippieh came the oohh..

                  As seen on the image or better the attached skp-file the warper can give nice results- but "destroys" components as well ("full" method). Only the "affine" method keeps components intact and morphes them somehow- but the result i would consider veery good.. 😉 Not really usable for me at least..

                  paneling3.jpg
                  warpter test.skp

                  Maybe there is no way to eg. have some "reference points" of a component which are placed onto according points of a certain face- and all elements of the components are stretched etc in relation to the reference points. (I think this is somehow how FFD, twisting etc work internally(interpolating)).

                  paneling4.jpg

                  But doing this and keeping these objects "linked" to it's basic component is the problem- maybe this is even out of sketchup's possibilities..?

                  I could live with it before and for sure it would be great to see some of these "extensions" in another SU release. It would really be 👍
                  Who doesn't dream of a program that is simple polymodeling like SU and has the power of rhino, max and maybe some other features from somewhere..

                  ..at least i do. 😉

                  still sketchin'

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • mitcorbM Offline
                    mitcorb
                    last edited by

                    Is this what a Bezier 'Patch' or 'mesh' or 'lattice' would do if we actually had one?

                    I take the slow, deliberate approach in my aimless wandering.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • TIGT Offline
                      TIG Moderator
                      last edited by

                      ExtrudeEdgesByRailsToLattice does this from 4 'curves' - triangulating to allow meaningful skewing - you can't twist glass easily etc...Capture.PNG
                      And similarly LatticeMaker on an existing surface's 'mesh' faces, using only the face edges provided...Capture1.PNG

                      TIG

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • H Offline
                        harnstein
                        last edited by

                        Yep,

                        twisting glass is a different story, eg. if you have a look at the "Elbphilharmonie"

                        Quote: "The windows themselves are a masterpiece of engineering. Never before have glass panes been separately marked, coated and then shaped at 600° C with millimetre precision. The curvature of each pane depends on the particular area of the building."
                        Necessary? I don't know..

                        Yes, i love the lattice plugins, i use latticemaker / latticizer for all windows at least in the early design process. It's great what you can do with it.
                        And i can get to quite good results building something, eg. a skyscraper and use "twist" on it. (Even if the glass gets twisted which results in hard-to-produce-in-reality elements, but it looks good and it's alright in the designing process)
                        Like this (early stage render)
                        twisted tower .jpg

                        But what about having a selection on faces, eg. of a lofted surface, and "attaching" one certain component to each of these faces, no matter if they are sheared, large or small, bend, whatever. The result would be a smooth surface in the look of the base component.

                        Even if the ability to change the base component later and change all "morphed" instances at the same time would be lost it would be a great tool- wouldn't it?

                        @mitcorb: I'm not sure how to understand what you mean, but bezier patch sounds good 😄

                        still sketchin'

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • mitcorbM Offline
                          mitcorb
                          last edited by

                          Bezier patch==Bezier Surface, a deformable grid similar to Blender's Lattice Deformation
                          Starting with this link:
                          http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=bezier%20patch&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CDAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FB%25C3%25A9zier_surface&ei=-JVHT9r3EPOrsALRnNnqCA&usg=AFQjCNFRHwkJEdlkp2H0fOfWOhC-5NOtig&cad=rja

                          ThomThom was thinking about this or something like it a while back.

                          I take the slow, deliberate approach in my aimless wandering.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • 1 / 1
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Buy SketchPlus
                          Buy SUbD
                          Buy WrapR
                          Buy eBook
                          Buy Modelur
                          Buy Vertex Tools
                          Buy SketchCuisine
                          Buy FormFonts

                          Advertisement