[Plugin] Slicer5

TIG · 31 Dec 2011, 14:15

Here's v5.1 http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?p=374969#p374969
Slicer5 Exporter tool added.
This additional tool now allows you to Export Slices later on from a selected FLAT-1234 set.
So after Slicer5 makes the Slices you can edit them [e.g. move Text-tags or edit Slices' geometry] before doing a [re]Export as PNGs [or DXFs for Pro-users]...

ken · 31 Dec 2011, 14:37

@tig said:

@unknownuser said:

...Is it possible to make the selection in % of total instead of a set length. This was one could get 50%, 25% or 10% cut for viewing. With this option, a 50% cut would divided the section into two parts.
...Ken
'fraid not - but a little measuring and a calculator should give you the values to enter to get the same result...
It's a slice-maker - not 'Zorro'...

TIG

Well thanks for looking at request.

Thank you for all your plugins.

Ken

boilingsnow · 1 Jan 2012, 12:51

Similiar to Slicemodeler...
Any new functions?

TIG · 1 Jan 2012, 13:00

@boilingsnow said:

Similiar to Slicemodeler...
Any new functions?
Read the Notes !

TIG · 1 Jan 2012, 19:28

Here's v5.2 http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?p=374969#p374969
Please [re]read the notes because a lot of new functionality has been added.
5.1 Slicer5 Exporter tool added.
5.2 New Spacing2/Thickness2/Insets'2/Tolerance dialog added - this now lets you have dual-axis Slice sets with different spaces/thickness and insets at the start/end AND slotting etc.
The new Tolerance feature allows you to oversize the slots slightly for CNC cuttingm for an easy fit of panels [e.g. 0.2mm].
The Slot ? option [Yes/No, to slot or not to slot] and an Overcut [dog-boning] options are also added to the same new dialog - entering anything > 0 for this will then ease the slot ends where the CNC router-bit rounds off the slots' internal corners and prevents a perfect mating of slots, so that then the overcut slots will fit together neatly.
Entering a Spacing of '0' now opens another dialog where you can enter the number of Spaces required, rather than using a fixed Spacing: this also works independently for the two Slice-sets when using dual-axes, so one axis can have 2 Spaces [3 Slices] while the other axis has 8 Spaces [9 Slices]...
Tip: to adjust which is the first of the made/slotted Slice-set [XY/XZ/YZ] rotate the Sliced Object in 3d so its X [or Y] direct matches the first set required...

Hopefully it's now approaching AutoCAD-123d in the 'slice-slot-modeling' department...
The solid side for 3d printing is a separate issue...

jim smith · 1 Jan 2012, 22:29

Thank you for the update TIG and Happy New Year!

guanjin · 2 Jan 2012, 17:49

@tig said:

Here's v5.2 http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?p=374969#p374969
Please [re]read the notes because a lot of new functionality has been added.
5.1 Slicer5 Exporter tool added.
5.2 New Spacing2/Thickness2/Insets'2/Tolerance dialog added - this now lets you have dual-axis Slice sets with different spaces/thickness and insets at the start/end AND slotting etc.
The new Tolerance feature allows you to oversize the slots slightly for CNC cuttingm for an easy fit of panels [e.g. 0.2mm].
The Slot ? option [Yes/No, to slot or not to slot] and an Overcut [dog-boning] options are also added to the same new dialog - entering anything > 0 for this will then ease the slot ends where the CNC router-bit rounds off the slots' internal corners and prevents a perfect mating of slots, so that then the overcut slots will fit together neatly.
Entering a Spacing of '0' now opens another dialog where you can enter the number of Spaces required, rather than using a fixed Spacing: this also works independently for the two Slice-sets when using dual-axes, so one axis can have 2 Spaces [3 Slices] while the other axis has 8 Spaces [9 Slices]...
Tip: to adjust which is the first of the made/slotted Slice-set [XY/XZ/YZ] rotate the Sliced Object in 3d so its X [or Y] direct matches the first set required...

Hopefully it's now approaching AutoCAD-123d in the 'slice-slot-modeling' department...
The solid side for 3d printing is a separate issue...

I just change my language, you have upgraded, I really admire, rapidly!

guanjin · 2 Jan 2012, 18:52

I use the slice, the second parameter set, waiting for a long period of time slices, the reason is the operation?
The exported file Where can I find?
Thank you TIG!

TIG · 2 Jan 2012, 20:13

@guanjin said:

I use the Slicer5 tool, with the second parameter set; I waited for a long time for the Slices - the reason is the [number of] operations ?
The exported files... Where can I find them?
A form that is that complex with slots etc WILL take a long time to process all of the parts...
It looks like it failed - because there are no proper slots made***.
Is the sliced object very small ?
If you have exported the files initially [OR you do it later] the PNG files are put into their own folder in the same folder as the SKP itself - read the Notes about its naming etc [if you use Pro the DXF files are in another similar folder]. Ensure your SKP's folder has security-rights to be written to by all, so the folder get made.
***Keep the Ruby Console open for any error messages IF it's not working as you expected...

ivreich · 2 Jan 2012, 23:03

@tig said:

@guanjin said:

I use the Slicer5 tool, with the second parameter set; I waited for a long time for the Slices - the reason is the [number of] operations ?
The exported files... Where can I find them?
A form that is that complex with slots etc WILL take a long time to process all of the parts...
It looks like it failed - because there are no proper slots made***.

Hi TIG

I'm experiencing some problems as well. The slots aren't properly cut, faces are deleted etc. I've attached the file for you to look at.

Cheers,

Joel

File for TIG

TIG · 3 Jan 2012, 00:16

ivreich

I'll look into your problem SKP.
I suspect it's some issues with 'tolerances' while doing the first slice-set slotting.

I'll post a fix asap...

xrok1 · 3 Jan 2012, 07:19

I'm Sorry TIG I didnt see the XY option. My bad! This is great. Thank you**[b][b]**[/b][/b]

TIG · 3 Jan 2012, 14:09

Here's v5.3 http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?p=374969#p374969
A new 'Text-Height' option has been added to the first dialog.
It's been recoded to avoid fails and small 'snags' with complex slotting solutions, that a few of you had reported...

guanjin · 3 Jan 2012, 17:46

@tig said:

Here's v5.3 http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?p=374969#p374969
A new 'Text-Height' option has been added to the first dialog.
It's been recoded to avoid fails and small 'snags' with complex slotting solutions, that a few of you had reported...

Slice thickness can not be changed???

TIG · 3 Jan 2012, 18:49

Sorry guanjin, you [and now I] have spotted a major typo/issue... so an update is in the pipeline...

TIG · 3 Jan 2012, 19:30

Sorry guys !
Stupid typo in the code means I broke it...
Here's v5.4 http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?p=374969#p374969

Ben Ritter · 3 Jan 2012, 20:28

Thank you TIG!

guanjin · 4 Jan 2012, 04:40

@tig said:

Sorry guys !
Stupid typo in the code means I broke it...
Here's v5.4 http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?p=374969#p374969

Slice thickness and parameter settings are not the same?

TIG · 4 Jan 2012, 13:21

gaunjin

They are quite correct!
There are 'overlaps' on the slices.

You have selected a combination of the sliced-object height [z], slice-spacing and slice-thickness that cause an 'overlap' of slices on the start and last slices.
This is because the slices are always set out from the object's center towards the start/end slices and there will never be a spacing that is more than you have specified.
I assume the spacing is 80mm and the slice is 50mm thick - which gives a 'gap' of 30mm - which you show.
Slices are always placed at the extreme start/end positions, irrespective of the specified spacing.
Because in your combination of dimensions the spacing next to the start/end slice is less than the normal spacing/thickness the adjacent slices are located less than the normal 'maximum' spacing - in your case that actually overlap with the start/end slices. This overlap is ~35mm as your dimension shows - that isn't a slice its two 50mm slices overlapping by ~35mm !
You could delete the start/end slice so that the spacing is consistent for all remaining slices, BUT then the slices won't extend completely from the start to the end of the sliced-object, which results from the specified spacing/thickness not dividing exactly into the object's height !
Alternatively you could remove the overlapping slices near the start/end to have a bigger gap/spacing for the star/end slices.

So if you want exact spacing you must make your sliced-object with a dimension that is a multiple of the required spacing, LESS one slice thickness [this because the first last slices are made 'flush' with the sliced-object's extents, NOT centered on them]: so if you want 80mm spacing of 50mm slices in the Z you must ensure that the sliced-object is (N*80mm)+50mm high, where N is the number of slices needed to get near to the required Z-height.
If you have a to-be-sliced-object that must be an exact Z-height, and want the slices to be evenly located using an approximate spacing, then use the new option that was introduced in a recent update.
You simply enter 0 as the spacing, you then get another dialog where you are asked for the number of spaces. The dialog would show something like 'Number of Spaces [Z 800mm]:' - where 800mm is the height of the object, if the spacing needs to be about 80mm and the thickness is 50mm... try 10 number, the spacing will then be (800-50)/10=75mm, or perhaps 9 number for (800-50)/9=83.333mm - you can then choose which spacing suits your needs.

As a result of your post I spotted an unconnected glitch when swapping between Space=0 and a dimension - that's fixed and will be posted soon...

TIG · 4 Jan 2012, 13:28

Here's v5.5 http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?p=374969#p374969
A glitch found when after using Spacing=0, and reverting to Spacing='length', it would stick as an 'integer', not reverting to a decimal 'length' - this is now fixed.