sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    ℹ️ Licensed Extensions | FredoBatch, ElevationProfile, FredoSketch, LayOps, MatSim and Pic2Shape will require license from Sept 1st More Info

    [Plugin] 2dBoolean ver1.3.1 beta UPDATE 20 dec 2013

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Plugins
    88 Posts 8 Posters 48.8k Views 8 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • TIGT Offline
      TIG Moderator
      last edited by

      The 'ldd*' greps to Ledas's 'Driving Dimensions', which probably does mess with several base classes, perhaps ill-advisedly - the earlier .rb versions I've seen certainly did! ...
      As far as I can see your tool is not doing anything at all 'awkward' then I suggest that you PM the DD author about this issue...
      I loaded the latest DD with the .rbs files into v7 and it breaks your tool AND my EEbyRails etc and my olde Mirror tool - which also use some group copy code too... So there could be potentially many issues uncovered here πŸ˜’
      I'll PM Dmitry Ushakov...

      TIG

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • jolranJ Offline
        jolran
        last edited by

        Well there you go. Driving Dimension it was. If I remember correctly I uninstalled DD because of some crashes, this file must have been left behind. I will update this in the starting page.

        @unknownuser said:

        I'll PM Dmitry Ushakov...

        Yes please. That would be good. I'm sure he would want to know, since it's not breaking only the 2dboolean script.

        Thank you.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • jolranJ Offline
          jolran
          last edited by

          BTW(If you would read this). Is it working for you, Pilou?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • pilouP Offline
            pilou
            last edited by

            I obtain that with the V6, but I don't very well understood what must be inside the rectangle ? 😳
            An image, a texture, a color...? (here it's a texture)
            Result is on the right
            luddites.jpg

            Frenchy Pilou
            Is beautiful that please without concept!
            My Little site :)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • TIGT Offline
              TIG Moderator
              last edited by

              In your example the 'face' is the blank top of the box, the 'group' is the face with the grouped 'image' material.
              Select both then run the tool
              The result is that the grouped 'image' is trimmed to fit on the select face
              If the grouped 'image' were smaller and arrayed like tiles then the whole lot would would be trimmed...like this Capture.PNG

              TIG

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • jolranJ Offline
                jolran
                last edited by

                Ok. I should have made a better tutorial about this. Sorry 😳 .

                Tig has illustrated the whole purpose of the tool.

                It might not be clear WHY use this tool when you visually can get the same result from a material IN Sketchup. BUT when used with Layout to simulate vector color and edges, for printing you will get much more precision in quality.
                And edges can be used with styles. So some pretty nice sketchy effects can be made.

                This tool wasent originaly designed to use whole faces to texture and color things, it's an intersect tool for edgepatterns.
                From that perspective, modeling all those edge-patterns each time can be very tedious, so hence this tool..

                The main difference compared to Sketchups internal intersect tool is that the face materials are kept, by turning them into a cutting component.

                I'm experiencing a little inconsistency in the intersections(you can call it a bug), so I will have a look at that.
                Faces with holes dont get erased at times.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • pilouP Offline
                  pilou
                  last edited by

                  πŸ’š
                  So I have made the exact inverse πŸ˜„
                  Now all works like a charm in the V6! πŸ‘
                  Bravo! 😎
                  Except you have created a group (the initial group floating in the space with texture in my case now empty but always present! )
                  that you must kill after the process!
                  You can only kill it with the Outliner! 😲

                  luddites_bis.jpg

                  Frenchy Pilou
                  Is beautiful that please without concept!
                  My Little site :)

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • jolranJ Offline
                    jolran
                    last edited by

                    Nice Pilou. From judging at your pictures, that is the desired behavior of the plugin.

                    What do you mean exactly? There is a group I have forgoten to delete? 😲 Or maybe that you cannot select the component, except then in the outliner? The second alternativ was corrected by defn.invalidate_bounds.
                    But maybe that method doesent work on SU6. Do you have this problem on all su versions?

                    If you doubleclick the component in the outliner (to enter the group) and then exit again, the boundingbox will be reset.
                    But that is just a workaround if this method doesent work on older su versions.

                    Thanks for the feedback Pilou πŸ‘
                    Please test in on holes and such.. It should work on all standard axis(Su views), but sometimes it fails on "in between" angles. I'm working on a solution to resque if the calculation fails.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • TIGT Offline
                      TIG Moderator
                      last edited by

                      If you have an 'empty' group [or definition] that's been made or just emptied within a start/commit block, then it should be auto-deleted at the 'commit' [this is also a way to remove just one definition from the model - empty its entities...] πŸ€“

                      TIG

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • jolranJ Offline
                        jolran
                        last edited by

                        I did not know that. Good info. Garbage collection? Well in this case all the groups and defs are made within the block, so all good? Of course the group or definition would have to empty..

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • TIGT Offline
                          TIG Moderator
                          last edited by

                          Of course if you have references to the groups etc then a simple group.erase! or inside a start/commit block the group.entities.erase_entities(group.entities.to_a) will both remove that one group [or instance OR definition when entities go!]... or groups[0]/parent.entities.erase_entities(groups) [where 'groups' is an array of all temporary groups]... will all work !

                          TIG

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • jolranJ Offline
                            jolran
                            last edited by

                            Cool. So you can erase the group by erasing it's entities while inside a start/commit block? That could be useful, thanks.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • jolranJ Offline
                              jolran
                              last edited by

                              Small update. Now If you have a component that have gluing behavior you don't have to select a face to run the plugin. I noticed you run into situations quite often where that is needed. Like when the face is covered and you can not select it. πŸ˜„

                              This will not work with groups.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • jolranJ Offline
                                jolran
                                last edited by

                                I think I know why faces in holes don't get erased.

                                Face.classify point only deals with points/vertices. So if there is a face in a hole inside the face(inner edge loop). Erasing the vertices from face.classify point outside(holes included) does not erase the face in the hole at all times πŸ˜•

                                Don't know how to solve that one yet.. But at least I know what's wrong.

                                I reckon the plugin is kinda useless, unless I fix this. So it's got high priority now.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • jolranJ Offline
                                  jolran
                                  last edited by

                                  I think I am close fixing this hole problem.

                                  So I have made a collection of verticies(from face.clone) That binds the innerloops in faceclone(faces to go)

                                  I want to use that collection to erase the faces in the boolean group.
                                  This does not work 😞

                                  (@verts=vertex collection) need to be instance variable or it will get deleted..

                                  cents.to_a.each{|e| 
                                  		       if e.class==Sketchup;;Face and e.outer.loop==@verts.loops
                                  		          gp2faces2 << e
                                  			  end
                                  			}           
                                  			
                                  			cents.erase_entities(gp2faces2)
                                  
                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • TIGT Offline
                                    TIG Moderator
                                    last edited by

                                    @verts is an array ?
                                    e.outer.loop==@verts.loops won't work as an array doesn't have a '.loops' method ??
                                    e.outer.loop==@verts[0].loops[0] might if there's only one loop ???
                                    @verts[0].loops.include?(e.outer.loop) might otherwise ????
                                    Not sure... as you posted 'clipped code'...

                                    TIG

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • jolranJ Offline
                                      jolran
                                      last edited by

                                      Sorry my post was unclear and made in a hurry 😳

                                      Yes it's an array of face.vertices. The one from face.clone, faces to go.

                                      I suppose there are multiple ways of achieving what I want. But I have failed so far.
                                      Will try some combination of @verts[0.loops.include?(e.outer.loop)] as you suggest, see what happends.
                                      There could be scenarios where the faces has multiple "holes", so e.outer.loop==@verts[0.loops[0]] might not work.

                                      Thank you TIG.
                                      Off to try!

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • EarthMoverE Offline
                                        EarthMover
                                        last edited by

                                        Here's a video tutorial on using the plugin for stamping stone patterns into various shapes. So far I've had great results. Thanks again Joel and TIG!

                                        [flash=800,600:1trov9v7]http://www.youtube.com/v/SNTQDBmKIro[/flash:1trov9v7]

                                        3D Artist at Clearstory 3D Imaging
                                        Guide Tool at Winning With Sketchup
                                        Content Creator at Skapeup

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • jolranJ Offline
                                          jolran
                                          last edited by

                                          Earthmover! β˜€

                                          That's quite a demonstration. Really! I can see here experienced modelers can find new workflows. Nice use of styles too.

                                          I know it's a bit slow when having a lot of geometry. It will be faster in Hatchfaces (tiled patterns without faces).

                                          Anyway, thank you for a nice video.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • jolranJ Offline
                                            jolran
                                            last edited by

                                            I'm wondering if the "hole" issue can be solved at all using face.classify method. πŸ˜•

                                            Watching Eartmover movie one can see he using a lot of detail in his meshes. Doing that, you will probably get faces and edges erased from holes, of the face it's glued to. Wich is the desired result!

                                            But if you are using less geometry for intersecting! For ex just a 2d square covering some holes. The face covering the hole will not be deleted cause there arent any vertices in the hole. The same if you have an edge crossing over the hole it will be assumed to be outside the hole, and therefore not deleted.

                                            Now, I have come so far to create a new group inside the colored group, that is a face_clone of the "holes".
                                            Don't know yet how I am going to use it as a reference for what to delete, since the faces are inside an individual group.
                                            Tried exploding it but the reference to the faces gets deleted.

                                            This could take a while to fix...


                                            dilemma.jpg

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 5
                                            • 5 / 5
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Buy SketchPlus
                                            Buy SUbD
                                            Buy WrapR
                                            Buy eBook
                                            Buy Modelur
                                            Buy Vertex Tools
                                            Buy SketchCuisine
                                            Buy FormFonts

                                            Advertisement