[Plugin] UV Toolkit

vanman

Hi,

I used the plugin to use the "Frontface Material to Backface", and it worked fine, but when I check for errors in SU, it says: "The front or back texture coordinates for CFaceTextureCoords (48) is not valid" for every face and when I click fix, it reverts to the way it was before using the plugin (no textures on the backfaces).

Any ideas? Or is this normal?

Thanks.

TIG

@vanman said:

Hi,

I used the plugin to use the "Frontface Material to Backface", and it worked fine, but when I check for errors in SU, it says: "The front or back texture coordinates for CFaceTextureCoords (48) is not valid" for every face and when I click fix, it reverts to the way it was before using the plugin (no textures on the backfaces).

Any ideas? Or is this normal?

Thanks.
I don't know without seeing the SKP file in question...
My FixReversedFaceMaterials flips faces and reuses the back-material that was incorrectly 'looking out' so it's now on the front-face that's now changed to be correctly 'looking outwards'... if you get my drift... try that and see if there are errors...

vanman

Cool thanks. I'll give it a try.

thomthom

Can you post a sample model please?

vanman

I've PM'd you.
Thanks for the help.

thomthom

@vanman said:

Hi,

I used the plugin to use the "Frontface Material to Backface", and it worked fine, but when I check for errors in SU, it says: "The front or back texture coordinates for CFaceTextureCoords (48) is not valid" for every face and when I click fix, it reverts to the way it was before using the plugin (no textures on the backfaces).

Any ideas? Or is this normal?

Thanks.

Huh! That's odd. Don't know what's going on here. Never seen that before - and the model looks to be fine. I'll have to investigate.

TIG

Is there a very tiny facet that returns invalid coordinates, that are regarded as the same because of the 'rounding' of its very close vertex-points ?

I just had a perhaps somewhat similar issue with my Octane Exporter [on their forum]... Someone has made a very small object that would have had overly tiny facets when created, if they hadn't scaled it up to process and then back down when done - the small facets can exists, it's just making them that's the issue. So far so good... now they exported it to OBJ format for use in Octane and there were tiny holes in the object when it rendered. Octane requires the OBJ to be in 'm' and have triangulated faces. In processing the meshes my tool uses the API methods to triangulate the mesh's faces. I now think that what was happening was that the triangulation of some tiny quad faces resulted in two triangulated facets that are so small that they have two vertices that 'round' to be at the 'same point' [the OBJ format is set to 'm' 6 d.p.] - therefore that new facet can't exist as its only a 'line' at best, and the two parts can then be missed, out leaving a small quad shaped hole when the object is reformed from the OBJ data...
This could of course also mess with the tiny face's texture mapping ?

thomthom

It's a 1:1 scale building with textures...

TIG

BUT might it still not have a very tiny textured facet somewhere that is thereby tripping things up ?

thomthom

I'm not finding any small faces...

Sketchup.active_model.selection.each { |f| puts f.area }
90921.1990251775
8884.83094815197
89096.7297450352
8797.85733797857
73856.383925685
141994.698396594
9102.23521971269
12145.8874379084
24291.7748758168
72875.3920821179
44959.9790473181
14734.602162027
17691.3311847609
24392.7484579021
30011.1066867323
5913.42252781615
106356.388178604
34341.9813095441
3545905.862747
4551.09075463125
141994.698396594
50062.2342056662
104443.19428945
427926.997414128
498.944000443444
1387.04002680257
555.234138673402
1387.04002680257
498.938868995756
1387.04002680257
555.228428303232
1387.04002680257
498.945026732981
1387.04002680257
555.235280747436
1387.04002680257
498.945026732981
1387.04002680257
555.235280747436
1387.04002680257
13652.9721252099
153511.061835866
543.299207966775
1387.04002680257
604.593436356126
1387.03753654542
27697.347044386
4359.49237901717
4451.34639743716
4451.35947758332
4451.35424552485
4451.35424552485
4451.36013159063
4451.3599680888
36670.6765526049
4451.35362924216
4451.35379274376
4451.34790668637
4451.34790668637
4451.35313873738
4451.34005860984
4359.49925111979
30024.5993279971
67236.1596991253
17251.2833128222
21472.4971347198
25566.7510791362
128807.275064796
493528.467044927
23028.3607461373
18401.0262709489
130944.016437284
511510.510285885
22920.9833744596
20675.3865149603
125516.784053139
9609.28530909866
7391.72898352146
7391.72898352146
182.619508624077
213.451079707593
5652.52077005804
5652.52077005804
613232.018621877
18262.0502714831
9102.22363510579
362053.963948095
13639.6107236221
23326.5092276735
263054.266003366
661.054059026763
44600.8861230744
75814.7493808884
12669.2358815777
35555.4855367881
12669.2358815777
8522.23635725677
8522.23635725677
668996.234413132
543.287712531164
1387.03753654542
604.58207642406
498.938121928659
1387.03753654542
555.228912425377
1387.03753654542
498.93825021456
1387.03753654542
555.229055184646
1387.03753654542
498.937737070955
1387.03753654542
555.228484147571
498.942868507002
1387.03753654542
555.234194518316
1387.03753654542
498.937737070955
1387.03753654542
555.228484147571
1387.03753654542
498.943894794211
1387.03753654542
555.235336592465
1387.03753654542
498.943894794211
1387.03753654542
555.235336592465
1387.03753654542
261012.344038505
13652.9721252099
1387.03753654542
498.939253854332
1387.04002680257
555.228856580994
1387.04002680257
498.939382140525
1387.04002680257
555.228999340249
1387.04002680257
498.938868995756
1387.04002680257
555.228428303232
1387.04002680257
6522.12890144438
11305.0324846641
16957.5094865821
11305.0324846641
16957.5094865821
18109.752711948
201171.422032186
165547.943793187

Btw vanman - your SketchUp file is 8 MB because the texture you used is 8MB JPG - 4096x4096 pixels. The very max SketchUp will display is 2048x2048 if you enable large textures.

TIG

I'm out of ideas then

vanman

Ok,

Thanks for looking into it. I'll just deal with it on a model by model basis.
I'll reduce the image size, I didn't know about the SU max texture size.

thomthom

I've not had time to dig deep into this. I've a wee bit busy for the time being. Trying to get some stuff ready for Basecamp.

usen

Thanks.

mannomann

Hi,
sorry for that question: I put the plugin into the plugin folder. But no plugin is in SU. What is wrong?
J.
Cannot read 23 pages for installing problems. Tried to use the search, but no results for that problem.

Gaieus

@mannomann said:

...Cannot read 23 pages for installing problems...

Just read the first post and make sure you follow the instructions carefully. Have you also installed the TT_Lib library for instance?

mannomann

Didn´t and don´t find installing instructions. And in the downloaded file I also do not see the TT_lib library.

mannomann

Ok - thank you.
The missing TT_Lib was the problem.
Best regards

The Firle Fanz

Hi,
I already installed the TT_UV_Toolkit at my Laptop at home.
Here on my businesss PC I don´t know anymore and can´t remember where to put the TT_Lib???!!!
And I still do not find a installing instructions for that.
Would somebody please be so kind and show me the install passage?
Or any hint?
Thanks in advance MM

OK - found it.
MM

dickorama

You sure these UV things work on Sketchup 8? I've been getting a lot of errors, namely:

Error Loading File C:/Program Files (x86)/Google/Google SketchUp 8/Plugins/TT_UV_Toolkit/loader.rb
no such file to load -- TT_Lib2/core.rbError Loading File tt_uv_toolkit_2.rb
no such file to load -- TT_Lib2/core.rb

And before you ask, creating the TT_Lib2 folder and placing core.rb in it did not work well. And it's not really my job to try and "hack" plugins so they work.