sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    🛣️ Road Profile Builder | Generate roads, curbs and pavements easily Download

    Geometric Tools

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved SketchUp Discussions
    sketchup
    12 Posts 8 Posters 1.2k Views 8 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • X Offline
      xrok1
      last edited by

      i like the shapes and toolbar that come with sketchy physics. 😉

      “There are three classes of people: those who see. Those who see when they are shown. Those who do not see.”

      http://www.Twilightrender.com try it!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • R Offline
        remus
        last edited by

        The slightly longer answer is that there isnt nay primitives in SU because its so easy to make them yourself, and they'll be the right size as well.

        As everyones mentioned there are a few plugins available for making primitives, though.

        http://remusrendering.wordpress.com/

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • E Offline
          Ecuadorian
          last edited by

          You can also search for them in the components dialog.

          -Miguel Lescano
          Subscribe to my house plans YouTube channel! (30K+ subs)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • TIGT Offline
            TIG Moderator
            last edited by

            These are the old 'shape' toolset made some years ago - they still work.
            Unzip and put all 3*** of the files into your SUp plugins folder and you get a 'Shapes...' sub-menu under 'Draw'.
            *** There are two versions of 'Shapes' for metric and imperial users. Only put in one of these rubies - ShapesMM.rb is metric(mm) and ShapesINS.rb is in inches. If you put in both you'll get two identical sub-menus but both with metric default values since the MM one loads last and overwrites the INS !

            There's a list of the basic shapes then available:

            Box
            Cylinder
            Cone
            Torus
            Tube
            Prism
            Pyramid
            Dome
            Sphere [I added the sphere to @Last's original list].

            The created shape is made inside a group and it is 'parametric' - select it and right-click context-menu to Edit its values later on as needed. You can explode it back to it's base geometry but then it will have these values 'frozen'...
            The 'parametric.rb' and 'mesh_additions.rb' rubies are needed to make the whole thing work.


            Shapes.zip

            TIG

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Jean LemireJ Offline
              Jean Lemire
              last edited by

              Hi John, hi folks.

              See this SU file for ideas:


              Basic shapes.skp

              Jean (Johnny) Lemire from Repentigny, Quebec, Canada.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • mitcorbM Offline
                mitcorb
                last edited by

                Hi, Honolulu:
                I was looking at Wikipedia's info on Solid vs Surface modelers after that debate between Solo and hebrides, and it quickly got over my head. This question makes me wonder whether SU can be expanded improved any further.
                I think you meant in your second sentence that SU is a surface modeler. I think this is intentional to keep the program simple and more accessible--originally for architectural visualization. I am not sure if Blender is a solid modeler or a surface modeler, but it relies on vertices, edges, and faces. What it lacks is a graphic input method like sketchup, albeit there is a plugin for Blender available from an Italian guy.
                Sometimes if you really push SU, you can get edgeless faces, in other words SU forgets to draw a line along the edge of the face.
                Anyway, I wish I did understand all of this better.
                Best Regards, mitcorb

                I take the slow, deliberate approach in my aimless wandering.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • R Offline
                  remus
                  last edited by

                  John, if were going too off topic tell us to shut up and start a new thread.

                  Mitcorb, it sounds like your talking about NURBS modelling Vs. polygon modelling. NURBS comes in a few different forms, namely surface modellers and solid modellers. The important thing to remember here is that every surface in a NURBS modeller is represented by a series of mathematical curves.

                  polygon modelling on the other hand can only handle straight edges and flat surfaces. this is why a circle in SU isnt actually a circle, its a polygon with lots of sides.

                  The important distinction to make is that NURBS surfaces and polygon surfaces are different beasts. Polygon surfaces can only be flat (and in some programs they can only have a limited number of edges) whereas the only restriction on a NURBS surface is that it must be able to be expressed in terms of maths.

                  http://remusrendering.wordpress.com/

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • mitcorbM Offline
                    mitcorb
                    last edited by

                    Thanks, Remus.
                    And I didn't mean to drag this too far afield. Thanks for the hint.
                    mitcorb

                    I take the slow, deliberate approach in my aimless wandering.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • honoluludesktopH Offline
                      honoluludesktop
                      last edited by

                      It is my understanding that, cubes, spheres, cones, and cylinder are primitives of a solid modeler. SU is a surface modeler, and its primitives are surfaces.

                      When we draw a cube in SU, it is hollow. Technically, a surface has no third dimension (it has no thickness). In a solid modeler, the cube is filled. A pure solid modeler has no surfaces. Accordingly, a pure surface modeler would have no lines. In SU, a edge is a property of the surface, I don't think an edge was meant to be a line. A line is a primitive of a vector modeler.

                      The most sophisticated modelers are hybrids; including some vector, surface, and solid entities. In that sense, a SU lines (left when you erase a surface face) make SU a hybrid modeler, but without solid modeler primitives.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • honoluludesktopH Offline
                        honoluludesktop
                        last edited by

                        Thanks Mitcorb. Hope I didn't confuse too many readers. The only reason I am familiar with this stuff is that I used a solid modeler before switching to SU.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • 1 / 1
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Buy SketchPlus
                        Buy SUbD
                        Buy WrapR
                        Buy eBook
                        Buy Modelur
                        Buy Vertex Tools
                        Buy SketchCuisine
                        Buy FormFonts

                        Advertisement